Lamborghini Gallardo
Nauman Farooq blasts around Toronto in the 500bhp banana
The Lamborghini Gallardo (pronounced Ga-yar-doh) is the first baby Lambo since the Jalpa bowed out in 1988. However, 'baby' is hardly a way to describe this car, especially once you look at the specs. It has a 5-liter V10 engine, that pumps out 500 hp, that is a mere 80 hp less that its big brother, the Murcielago.
Having driven the Murcielago last year, the biggest question on my mind as I set off was whether it is just a detuned Murcielago or does the Gallardo has its own identity?
For the second year running, the weather was great, which was a true blessing, especially since the forecast was that of rain.
e Gear
The car I was provided with by Lamborghini Canada had the e-gear system gearbox, Lambo's first attempt at a paddle shift gearbox. It's fantastic! The shifts are not only quick, but require very little throttle liftoff to change gears. As you can imagine, getting upto highway speeds takes very little effort.
In fact, the whole driving experience takes very little effort. The controls are light at town speeds, the driving position is great, visibility to any angle is very clear, especially looking out the back which was never a Lamborghini strong point.
Quality fit and finish was also never a Lambo strong point, yet the Gallardo is built as well as... as well as an Audi actually. Not surprisingly, most of the switchgear comes from the Germans. That's needn't be a negative though since they picked all the nicest pieces available to them. Even Ferrari use Fiat parts bins. It's simple economics.
Powertrain
That leaves most of the budget available for the more important stuff such as sorting out the driving dynamics and producing monster engines. As mentioned before, the Gallardo has a 90 degree, V10, with four-valves per cylinder and variable valve timing. It pumps out 500 hp at 7800rpm and 376 lb/ft or torque at 4500rpm and the nicest exhaust note this side of an Enzo.
With just 1470kg to push and having a brilliant all-wheel drive system, this baby-Lambo will very easily hit 60 mph from stop in just 4.1 seconds. More impressively, it'll go from 0-100 mph in just 9 seconds flat, that is big boys supercars territory. Top speed puts it in the premier league too, with a top speed of 194 mph!
The Gallardo not only goes like the big league supercars, but also manages to handle like a light nimble sportscar, which came as a huge surprise. You can push it through corners at ridiculous speeds, and it'll just grip and grip. The last time I drove a car with such bionic grip was the Subaru STi, the Gallardo just has 40% more power to play with.
The Daily Driver
Yet, despite the sports suspension setup, despite the 19-inch rims, this is a very comfortable car to ride in. You can truly live with this car on a day to day basis, even in winter, if you had to.
So, any complaints, umm... the trunk space is very small, but that's it, I honestly can't think of anything else. This car is as close to perfection as it can be.
But is it better than or equal to a Murcielago? In a word, "No."
The Murcielago is a real beast, a wild lion in the African jungle, whereas the Gallardo is more like a trained circus lion, still deadly, but very well behaved.
These two cars might have a lot in common on paper, but on the road, they take the approach to speed in very different manners. I really can imagine someone having both these cars in their garage, the Gallardo for everyday use, and the Murcielago for when you want to blow your head off.
The Gallardo is a wonderful car, but it poses no threat to its big brother. However, Ferrari should feel very threatened, because the Gallardo is much more car than the current 360 Modena is. The bar has been raised...
Nauman Farooq
Links
Lots of threads mention this 360 vs G thing.
A Ferrari is a Ferrari . . . not to be touched.
The Lambo is an awesome car. But a bit dull (can't think of another word) compared to the 360. The F stays an exotic everytime you see one. The Lambo is just a tiny step behind and will always be i guess. . . In style and presence that is.
The quality and gründlichheid of these wheels will be better, but hey: we're talking almost-supercars here . . .
Remains: the G is an awesome bit of muscle. And yes, I want one over the 360.
Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......
completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....
dinkel said:
"However, Ferrari should feel very threatened, because the Gallardo is much more car than the current 360 Modena is. The bar has been raised..."
Lots of threads mention this 360 vs G thing.
A Ferrari is a Ferrari . . . not to be touched.
The Lambo is an awesome car. But a bit dull (can't think of another word) compared to the 360. The F stays an exotic everytime you see one. The Lambo is just a tiny step behind and will always be i guess. . . In style and presence that is.
The quality and gründlichheid of these wheels will be better, but hey: we're talking almost-supercars here . . .
Remains: the G is an awesome bit of muscle. And yes, I want one over the 360.
i have to disagree,i think that the current lambo range is far sexier than the ferrari range.
i don't think there is much in it between a gallardo and a 360CS but a murky is far more desirable than a 575/612.
i think lambo's are getting prettier and ferrari's uglier,IMHO
still,wouldn't say no to one of them though!
shnozz said:
Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......
completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....
1. I like the rear
2. Scissor doors went out with shag pile and flairs ! If you want history buy a classic car
3. I do not like the air intakes at the front as they clash with the shape of the lights above.
4. I would love a test drive but I think
I WANT ONE. Will
shnozz said:
Marki said:
I hear you ,, but it is such a georgous thing , for me the rear end is the only let down Scissor doors i can live with out .......
completely agree. Dont mind the lack of scissor doors but I do mind that assortment of boxes that is the rear of the Gallardo. Had a play with one whilst out in the chim recently. looked great in the wing mirror, when I "let him" overtake me it looked awful. And so, your honour, that was the reason I had to overtake him....
Thee hind quarters are a bit different than the erotic color and curves of the Diablo's but remeniscent of the LM002 back side? A minimalist machine asethtic, like a paper shredder. I've always wondered if Ferrari cators it's cars towards execs, sports stars, and wealthy collectors circles, making a car a little soft unless you go for the Stradale. It's a bit ridiculus because I have no experience except what a read. Peter Dron's book on the Countach echo's this theme. A light weight stripped down Gallardo would be nice next....
>> Edited by PiB on Saturday 8th May 23:25
Gassing Station | Supercar General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





). But for me, it just lacks that defining Lambo feature. I guess growing up in the 80s does that to you.


yes indeed Jason King springs to mind