Turbo people please..............advise.
Discussion
Ok, heres the problem. From either a 2.9 Cologne or 3.0 Essex V6, I want to end up with a 5 speed manual, putting out over 300bhp, and loadsa torque.
To be used in a 25cwt kitcar.
So, Essex, carbed, blow through or not, standard carb or something different, procharged, turbod, supercharged or a hybrid STS from the USA ?
Same question for the 2.9, but using injection rather than carb..........
Many options I guess.
Any ideas from anyone knowledgeable.
Nice capri in the latest copy of classic ford (bright green and black, its on the cover) has a Cosworth 2.9i cologne with about 270 bhp, might be worth having a look at to get some ideas.
Dont forget ford mustangs came with cologne based V6s (still do) so maybe look at some of the american ideas for power gains or maybe using a bigger displacement engine, otherwise 300bhp from a 3.0 or the 2.8i is big money.
Dont forget ford mustangs came with cologne based V6s (still do) so maybe look at some of the american ideas for power gains or maybe using a bigger displacement engine, otherwise 300bhp from a 3.0 or the 2.8i is big money.
Iain Daniels Classic Car Engineering in Appleby Magna have been campaigning a supercharged Essex Scimitar GTE in sprints and hillclimbing for about 10 years, running 330hp, very quick and reliable and thats still on a carb! there are plans to get it out of the dark ages and onto ecu/injection end of this season, target 400hp i believe. Give 'Danny' a bell, he'll buidl you a motor/sell you the correct bits im sure.
Sorry to hijack the thread......
In mind that the big end journals are relatively narrow. What is considered a safe power / torque output. I'm running just over 260Bhp and just over 270Lb/Ft torque, and was advised (by someone who I doubt) not to go over these outputs, or it will be new big end shells every 1-2K miles.
Any thoughts?
HENSEN, to get my engine (2.8 Cologne) to this output cost a fair amount of money, it has fantastic torque throughout so great to drive. Wouldn't a more modern engine be a cheaper long term option.
Regards,
Chris.
In mind that the big end journals are relatively narrow. What is considered a safe power / torque output. I'm running just over 260Bhp and just over 270Lb/Ft torque, and was advised (by someone who I doubt) not to go over these outputs, or it will be new big end shells every 1-2K miles.
Any thoughts?
HENSEN, to get my engine (2.8 Cologne) to this output cost a fair amount of money, it has fantastic torque throughout so great to drive. Wouldn't a more modern engine be a cheaper long term option.
Regards,
Chris.
taz turbo said:
Sorry to hijack the thread......
In mind that the big end journals are relatively narrow. What is considered a safe power / torque output. I'm running just over 260Bhp and just over 270Lb/Ft torque, and was advised (by someone who I doubt) not to go over these outputs, or it will be new big end shells every 1-2K miles.
Any thoughts?
HENSEN, to get my engine (2.8 Cologne) to this output cost a fair amount of money, it has fantastic torque throughout so great to drive. Wouldn't a more modern engine be a cheaper long term option.
Regards,
Chris.
How narrow ?In mind that the big end journals are relatively narrow. What is considered a safe power / torque output. I'm running just over 260Bhp and just over 270Lb/Ft torque, and was advised (by someone who I doubt) not to go over these outputs, or it will be new big end shells every 1-2K miles.
Any thoughts?
HENSEN, to get my engine (2.8 Cologne) to this output cost a fair amount of money, it has fantastic torque throughout so great to drive. Wouldn't a more modern engine be a cheaper long term option.
Regards,
Chris.
Subaru journals are very narrow, and can withstand silly power.
Ive also seen a Mitsi 2.5 V6 turbo stripped...and you would be amazed at how feeble their bearings, and even more so their rods are. They are the thinnest rods Ive ever seen.
taz turbo said:
stevieturbo said:
How narrow?
I would have to dig an old shell out to measure, but from memory there in the region of 15mm wide.Regards,
Chris.
Build a decent engine, use good oil, have it well tuned and it will be fine. 300bhp+ from a 2.9 engine is not difficult to achieve.
The video's are cool. A customer of mine is fitting a pair of custom vvt's onto his 24v and aiming for 600-700 hp. There's been a lot of work on his engine. He's also friendly with Turbotechnics and hopes to have a dyno shootout with Mr Kershaw once his engine is finished. Geoffs TT Minker also makes big power so it'll be an interesting comparison.
Gassing Station | Engines & Drivetrain | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



