Are these worn out? - Morris Minor Rockers
Are these worn out? - Morris Minor Rockers
Author
Discussion

lewis s

Original Poster:

5,937 posts

215 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Hi all, probably a stupid question but i need a quick answer as to whether these rockers are shagged or not?

I am trying to do a service on my girlfriends morris minor, and the final bit is to adjust the valve rocker clearances. Once in the correct positions the clearances all seemed a little tight, but on firther inspection the rocker pads seem to be in an awkward shape which makes the feeler guage open the clearance more than it should. I know this hardly makes sense but hopefully the pictures will explain better:







Any ideas?

dan19evans

4,954 posts

191 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
lewis s said:
Hi all, probably a stupid question but i need a quick answer as to whether these rockers are shagged or not?

I am trying to do a service on my girlfriends morris minor, and the final bit is to adjust the valve rocker clearances. Once in the correct positions the clearances all seemed a little tight, but on firther inspection the rocker pads seem to be in an awkward shape which makes the feeler guage open the clearance more than it should. I know this hardly makes sense but hopefully the pictures will explain better:



Any ideas?
not sure i get what you mean there mate. if the clearance is too tight for the feeler gauge (assuming your using the right thickness feeler gauge for that particular engine), then you need to adjust them.


if thats not what you meant please try to explain more smile

lewis s

Original Poster:

5,937 posts

215 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Ok i think i may have made a slight error in my previous attempt. I have now just put the feeler gauge just between the contact patches and not right the way through, and this seems a little better. Is this the correct method of doing so, the Haynes manual seems a little brief on the matter?

Also i keep seeing conflicting articles on what gap they should be at. The Haynes manual say 0.012", but sources on the internet say 0.010" and only 0.012" on high lift cam models. Is it better the gap be too large or too small?

I apologise for the onslaught of questions getmecoat

lewis s

Original Poster:

5,937 posts

215 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
dan19evans said:
lewis s said:
Hi all, probably a stupid question but i need a quick answer as to whether these rockers are shagged or not?

I am trying to do a service on my girlfriends morris minor, and the final bit is to adjust the valve rocker clearances. Once in the correct positions the clearances all seemed a little tight, but on firther inspection the rocker pads seem to be in an awkward shape which makes the feeler guage open the clearance more than it should. I know this hardly makes sense but hopefully the pictures will explain better:



Any ideas?
not sure i get what you mean there mate. if the clearance is too tight for the feeler gauge (assuming your using the right thickness feeler gauge for that particular engine), then you need to adjust them.


if thats not what you meant please try to explain more smile
Basically what i was doing was using the feeler gauge as per picture 3, but then that left the gap between the contact patches larger than 12 thou if you see what i mean? Sorry for my vagueness but i'm not sure on the best way to explain it. For example in the picture with the gauge the rocker is adjusted to give slight resistance, but nearer the end of the pad the gap seems huge. I was just not to clear on the correct procedure as i can't find any good articles to read on the matter confused

lewis s

Original Poster:

5,937 posts

215 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Heres an expert diagram to try and help explain hehe


dan19evans

4,954 posts

191 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
ahh right i think i can see what yo mean now smile

it does look a bit of an odd shape, but sorry no idea if its cream crackered or not frown

personally i'd go with the second attempt in your diagram.. sorry couldnt be more help

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

231 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Yes they're completely shagged. Best way to adjust those, other than replacing them, is with a dial gauge so you can accurately measure the 12 thou clearance you need. Feeler gauges are no use in a situation like that.

lewis s

Original Poster:

5,937 posts

215 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Pumaracing said:
Yes they're completely shagged. Best way to adjust those, other than replacing them, is with a dial gauge so you can accurately measure the 12 thou clearance you need. Feeler gauges are no use in a situation like that.
Thanks for the honest reply hehe

I have a spare engine in the back garden so i will see if they are any better thumbup

Steve_D

13,801 posts

282 months

Monday 7th June 2010
quotequote all
Old rockers like that will most likely be worn into a cup shape which the valve stem is then sitting in. Your 'feeler right through' method is bridging across the 'cup' and giving a false reading.
The longer term answer is to remove the rockers and rub them down on a grinding stone to remove the cup leaving a convex surface.
The short term answer is as advised to use a dial gauge to set the clearances.

Don't worry too much about the 2 thou difference as you would need to be pretty competent with feelers to achieve that repeatability.

Steve

annodomini2

6,964 posts

275 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Mini 1000cc Rockers

Full roller assembly

ETA: Pressed type (Same as yours)

Edited by annodomini2 on Tuesday 8th June 13:29

Justin S

3,658 posts

285 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
The only bugger is that to repace them, you have to undo the head rear bolts to remove the pillars. In doing this may cause HG problems ( unless the head is seized in place !!!). You 'might' be able to undo the rockers adjustments all the way and see if the rocker shaft will slide out and all the rockers and springs bounce all over the place by removing the split washer on the shaft and washers, being the engine is in line, although worn rockers, usually eat into the shaft underneath and may get stuck getting the shaft out. You could just get the A+ rockers, which are steel type and not cast style. They have a slightly larger pad area on them but that means swopping the set completely and might as well do a decoke and new HG at the same time. Only takes 30 mins to take a head off an A series anyway, as long as it all undoes.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

270 months

Tuesday 8th June 2010
quotequote all
Clearance is 12 thou, not 10. Well that's the figure I used to use, gleaned from the Haynes manual which unlike modern Haynes manuals was basically a reprint of the factory manual in a different cover, and so pretty trustworthy.

Once you've done 'em enough times you can do it by feel without the need for instruments hehe

Auntieroll

543 posts

208 months

Wednesday 9th June 2010
quotequote all
Justin S said:
The only bugger is that to repace them, you have to undo the head rear bolts to remove the pillars. In doing this may cause HG problems ( unless the head is seized in place !!!). You 'might' be able to undo the rockers adjustments all the way and see if the rocker shaft will slide out and all the rockers and springs bounce all over the place by removing the split washer on the shaft and washers, being the engine is in line, although worn rockers, usually eat into the shaft underneath and may get stuck getting the shaft out. You could just get the A+ rockers, which are steel type and not cast style. They have a slightly larger pad area on them but that means swopping the set completely and might as well do a decoke and new HG at the same time. Only takes 30 mins to take a head off an A series anyway, as long as it all undoes.
The likelyhood of any sort of gasket problems occuring on an old Cast Iron block/head is absolutely minimal IMHO.
If the set in the garden are OK swap them over complete ,don't P**s about trying to extract the rocker shaft in situ,it will be far quicker to swap the complete assy.
As the next post says,a head gasket is a dead easy job on a MM,if a failure should occur then replace it but I've never needed to.