6.5 meter tall 1 cyl 2 stroke diesel engine - 81 litre
6.5 meter tall 1 cyl 2 stroke diesel engine - 81 litre
Author
Discussion

Busa_Rush

Original Poster:

6,930 posts

280 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
In this brilliant little museum . . . http://www.motoren-museum.nl/

81 litre 2 sttroke diesel engine. Ticks over at 45 rpm, the exhaust pipe is as wide as a dustbin, needs to be started using compressed air. The owner starts it once a month . . . surprisingly smooth biggrin

Specification


Starting involves setting piston at just over tdc using a lever on the flywheel
The con rod can be seen through the perspex window on left


Cylinder Head


Exhaust


Rev counter

Kitchski

6,551 posts

260 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Epic! needs a brace of turbos though!

stevieturbo

18,072 posts

276 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
2 stroke seems to be the norm for these massive diesel engines etc.

Isnt this possible with smaller engines ?

slomax

7,265 posts

221 months

Wednesday 25th August 2010
quotequote all
Nitro RC engines work very much like small diesel 2 strokes. These are only up to a couple of cc though. I'm sure a reasonable 2 stroke diesel could be done, but why?

Yazza54

20,329 posts

210 months

Wednesday 25th August 2010
quotequote all
Bet that's a revver

stevieturbo

18,072 posts

276 months

Wednesday 25th August 2010
quotequote all
slomax said:
Nitro RC engines work very much like small diesel 2 strokes. These are only up to a couple of cc though. I'm sure a reasonable 2 stroke diesel could be done, but why?
There has to be performance advantages from spending more time making power, than sucking and exhausting like a 4 stroke.
If not, why does it work on massive engines and not small ones ?

chuntington101

5,733 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th August 2010
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
slomax said:
Nitro RC engines work very much like small diesel 2 strokes. These are only up to a couple of cc though. I'm sure a reasonable 2 stroke diesel could be done, but why?
There has to be performance advantages from spending more time making power, than sucking and exhausting like a 4 stroke.
If not, why does it work on massive engines and not small ones ?
Probably becuase there is much long time for the fuel air to burn before its all dumped out the exhasut. Aslo coss of the VERY slow RPM you need as many power strokes as you can!

In smaller 2 strokes everything happens soo fast that you cant get complete burn inside the cylinders.