Best sub 1 litre engine?
Discussion
In race terms - Honda 6 without doubt. Revolutionary for it's time - to the point where attempts to copy it for replicas have proved incredibly difficult to due to the manufacturing process used. Worth googling to read about the engine.
In production terms - CBR250RR or any of the late 80s 250 4 stroke engines. A 19,0000 rpm redline in a production engine with a years warranty - incredible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_CBR250
ETA Read the post properly numb-nuts 
OP have a look in the kit-car section. Best lumps to use are early blade, or R1 engines as they don't require a dry-sump, give 150bhp and you get a free sequential box thrown in.
In production terms - CBR250RR or any of the late 80s 250 4 stroke engines. A 19,0000 rpm redline in a production engine with a years warranty - incredible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_CBR250
ETA Read the post properly numb-nuts 
OP have a look in the kit-car section. Best lumps to use are early blade, or R1 engines as they don't require a dry-sump, give 150bhp and you get a free sequential box thrown in.
Edited by rhinochopig on Tuesday 9th November 16:20
A Scotsman said:
Car engine preferably..... less mods needed.
Despite it's age, I'd suggest that Hillman Imp engine might be worth a look, then.Very light, with equally light 4 speed transaxle (optional 5 speed with a Jack Knight gears) that can be inverted to give a mid-engined configuration.
Probably lighter and certainly simpler installation than a lot of bike engines (by the time you've cobbled together a reverse gear and differential assembly) or Kei-class turbo units.
Depends how much power you need, really (the Imp would give about 100bhp in a manageable state of tune for road use, at 998cc).
Assuming you are not chassing big power outputs, i think the toyota Igo engine is a really well designed modern small capacity engine, it's VERY light too:

"Toyota engineers developed a brand new 1.0-litre VVT-i petrol engine, adopting a 3-cylinder configuration. This lightweight unit weighs only 67 kg, which makes it the lightest internal combustion engine on the car market today. In addition, it is not only the most powerful 1.0-litre around (68 DIN hp/50 kW), but is also class-leading in specific torque (93 Nm at 3600 rpm)."
some of the design details on it, like the combined airfilter housing / cam cover are VERY well done, basically they have combined as many functions into every part that's on the engine to make it light and simple / cheap.

"Toyota engineers developed a brand new 1.0-litre VVT-i petrol engine, adopting a 3-cylinder configuration. This lightweight unit weighs only 67 kg, which makes it the lightest internal combustion engine on the car market today. In addition, it is not only the most powerful 1.0-litre around (68 DIN hp/50 kW), but is also class-leading in specific torque (93 Nm at 3600 rpm)."
some of the design details on it, like the combined airfilter housing / cam cover are VERY well done, basically they have combined as many functions into every part that's on the engine to make it light and simple / cheap.
Max_Torque said:
"Toyota engineers developed a brand new 1.0-litre VVT-i petrol engine, adopting a 3-cylinder configuration. This lightweight unit weighs only 67 kg, which makes it the lightest internal combustion engine on the car market today. In addition, it is not only the most powerful 1.0-litre around (68 DIN hp/50 kW), but is also class-leading in specific torque (93 Nm at 3600 rpm)."
I like light.. Max_Torque said:
Assuming you are not chassing big power outputs, i think the toyota Igo engine is a really well designed modern small capacity engine, it's VERY light too:

"Toyota engineers developed a brand new 1.0-litre VVT-i petrol engine, adopting a 3-cylinder configuration. This lightweight unit weighs only 67 kg, which makes it the lightest internal combustion engine on the car market today. In addition, it is not only the most powerful 1.0-litre around (68 DIN hp/50 kW), but is also class-leading in specific torque (93 Nm at 3600 rpm)."
some of the design details on it, like the combined airfilter housing / cam cover are VERY well done, basically they have combined as many functions into every part that's on the engine to make it light and simple / cheap.
No wonder its so light, much of the engine seems to be cutaway...
"Toyota engineers developed a brand new 1.0-litre VVT-i petrol engine, adopting a 3-cylinder configuration. This lightweight unit weighs only 67 kg, which makes it the lightest internal combustion engine on the car market today. In addition, it is not only the most powerful 1.0-litre around (68 DIN hp/50 kW), but is also class-leading in specific torque (93 Nm at 3600 rpm)."
some of the design details on it, like the combined airfilter housing / cam cover are VERY well done, basically they have combined as many functions into every part that's on the engine to make it light and simple / cheap.

regarding combined parts, I remeber seeing a telly programme about people trying to get a job at williams F1, cue loads of complicated people waffling loads of complicated rubbish in an attempt to blag a job, enter a normal bloke, whos idea was to combine the brake caliper and susp upright (or similar), He got the job!
Another shout for the Charade GT-ti engine, spec shamelessly stolen from the web, would of thought these engines/cars would be just about disposable these days. I would worry about the Aygo engine, after driving a loan car on more than one sad occasion, it's about the slowest car Iv'e ever driven....
some web site said:
1987 Daihatsu Charade GT-ti engine
Bore × stroke 76.00 mm × 73.00 mm
2.99 in × 2.87 in
Cylinders Inline 3
Displacement 1 litre
993 cc
(60.597 cu in)
Type DOHC
Key: SOHCSingle overhead camshaft DOHCDouble overhead camshaft OHVOverhead valves TSTwo stroke SVSide valves SlSleeve valves oiseOverhead inlet side exhaust See more...
4 valves per cylinder
12 valves in total
Construction
Lubrication
Compression ratio 7.80:1
Fuel system EFi
Maximum power
DIN 100.4 PS (99 bhp) (73.8 kW)
@ 6500 rpm
Specific output
DIN 99.7 bhp/litre
1.63 bhp/cu in
Maximum torque
DIN 126.0 Nm (93 ft·lb) (12.8 kgm)
@ 3500 rpm
bmep 1594.5 kPa (231.3 psi)
Specific torque
DIN 126.89 Nm/litre
Maximum rpm
Manufacturer Daihatsu
Code
Main crankshaft bearings 4
Coolant Water
Bore/stroke ratio 1.04
Unitary capacity 331 cc per cylinder
Aspiration Turbo
Compressor type 1 IHI RHB51 turbo
Intercooler Air/Air
Catalytic converter N
1987 Daihatsu Charade GT-ti performance
0-50 mph (80 km/h)
0-60 mph 7.70 s
0-100 km/h
0-100 mph
80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top
Standing ¼mile 16.40 s
Standing km
Top speed 185 km/h (115 mph)
Fuel consumption
CO2 Emissions
Carfolio Calculated CO2 ?
Power-to-weight 122.52 bhp/ton
1987 Daihatsu Charade GT-ti chassis
Engine location Front
Engine alignment Transverse
Drive Front wheel drive
Bore × stroke 76.00 mm × 73.00 mm
2.99 in × 2.87 in
Cylinders Inline 3
Displacement 1 litre
993 cc
(60.597 cu in)
Type DOHC
Key: SOHCSingle overhead camshaft DOHCDouble overhead camshaft OHVOverhead valves TSTwo stroke SVSide valves SlSleeve valves oiseOverhead inlet side exhaust See more...
4 valves per cylinder
12 valves in total
Construction
Lubrication
Compression ratio 7.80:1
Fuel system EFi
Maximum power
DIN 100.4 PS (99 bhp) (73.8 kW)
@ 6500 rpm
Specific output
DIN 99.7 bhp/litre
1.63 bhp/cu in
Maximum torque
DIN 126.0 Nm (93 ft·lb) (12.8 kgm)
@ 3500 rpm
bmep 1594.5 kPa (231.3 psi)
Specific torque
DIN 126.89 Nm/litre
Maximum rpm
Manufacturer Daihatsu
Code
Main crankshaft bearings 4
Coolant Water
Bore/stroke ratio 1.04
Unitary capacity 331 cc per cylinder
Aspiration Turbo
Compressor type 1 IHI RHB51 turbo
Intercooler Air/Air
Catalytic converter N
1987 Daihatsu Charade GT-ti performance
0-50 mph (80 km/h)
0-60 mph 7.70 s
0-100 km/h
0-100 mph
80-120 km/h (50-70 mph) in top
Standing ¼mile 16.40 s
Standing km
Top speed 185 km/h (115 mph)
Fuel consumption
CO2 Emissions
Carfolio Calculated CO2 ?
Power-to-weight 122.52 bhp/ton
1987 Daihatsu Charade GT-ti chassis
Engine location Front
Engine alignment Transverse
Drive Front wheel drive
Gassing Station | Engines & Drivetrain | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





not sure how easy it would be to get rid of the CVT and replace with a car box?