490rwhp NA LS1, with a baby 227 cam
490rwhp NA LS1, with a baby 227 cam
Author
Discussion

gsd2000

Original Poster:

11,515 posts

214 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-...

Interesting thread by Tony Mamo from AFR on this build.

The impressive part is that it only uses a 227/231 cam, granted with 11.6 CR, but is still fine on high octane 93 octane fuel

mikeyb1987

2,358 posts

185 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Looks a good solid NA build, with phenomenal figures. Just a couple of questions:
1) how much lift? What ratio are 10mm rockers (never heard of rockers referenced to like this)
2) is that US hp, so around 445rwhp in the UK?

Either way, impressive results smile

jameshsv

5,844 posts

191 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
I am also very impressed..

jameshsv

5,844 posts

191 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
I am also very impressed..

jameshsv

5,844 posts

191 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
mikeyb1987 said:
Looks a good solid NA build, with phenomenal figures. Just a couple of questions:
1) how much lift? What ratio are 10mm rockers (never heard of rockers referenced to like this)
2) is that US hp, so around 445rwhp in the UK?

Either way, impressive results smile
Only a bit bigger on the intake than your cam mikeyb1987

mikeyb1987

2,358 posts

185 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
jameshsv said:
Only a bit bigger on the intake than your cam mikeyb1987
True James. It must mean I should be able to screw some more power out of my setup!

Monaro5.7

7,337 posts

210 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
mikeyb1987 said:
jameshsv said:
Only a bit bigger on the intake than your cam mikeyb1987
True James. It must mean I should be able to screw some more power out of my setup!
I think there is more power in your cam as iam on 419rwhp

mikeyb1987

2,358 posts

185 months

Wednesday 10th December 2014
quotequote all
Monaro5.7 said:
I think there is more power in your cam as iam on 419rwhp
We need to organise a rolling road day, so we can compare smile

I'm 90% convinced to up the Rev limit and see what it'll do beyond 6,600rpm.

M11 MFP

688 posts

224 months

Thursday 11th December 2014
quotequote all

Using an arbitrary, but not ungenerous 20% drivetrain loss.

That chart yields a maximum BMEP of 217.04 psi at 4750 rpm - Looks a bit dodgy, like some dyno results TVR / Al Melling banded about some years back.

Don't think Tony Mamo is with AFR anymore. Be careful on Mamo's website (mamomotorsports.com ?). I think it's compromised.



Edited by M11 MFP on Thursday 11th December 08:50

ArnieVXR

2,458 posts

214 months

Thursday 11th December 2014
quotequote all
M11 MFP said:
Using an arbitrary, but not ungenerous 20% drivetrain loss.

That chart yields a maximum BMEP of 217.04 psi at 4750 rpm - Looks a bit dodgy, like some dyno results TVR / Al Melling banded about some years back.

Don't think Tony Mamo is with AFR anymore. Be careful on Mamo's website (mamomotorsports.com ?). I think it's compromised.



Edited by M11 MFP on Thursday 11th December 08:50
Do you really work on a farm?

MyM8V8

9,468 posts

226 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
jameshsv said:
I am also very impressed..
You are meant to be. As is any potential customer.


jameshsv

5,844 posts

191 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
MyM8V8 said:
You are meant to be. As is any potential customer.
Get your stroker running on the tarmac and I also will be greatly impressed.driving

ArnieVXR

2,458 posts

214 months

Friday 12th December 2014
quotequote all
jameshsv said:
Get your stroker running on the tarmac and I also will be greatly impressed.driving
I thought it was...?