M5 vs VXR thread
Author
Discussion

mogv8

Original Poster:

836 posts

251 months

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Cant see the point of a comparison between a standard machine and a heavily modified machine, if its you buying it then yes as its a personnel choice and you will be using it but this wont be a road test for people looking to purchase either, its just a comparison between the two cars... IL read it by all means but it will be meaningless really (both are slower than mine anyhow! biglaugh)
Wonder if they will mention the M5's attrocious MPG figures!!

If we really must compare... lets ask Harry and his 427TT to play with something interesting.. at least the performance will be mind boggling then.

caspy@wortec

141 posts

218 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
One isnt slower than yours!!

anonymous-user

77 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Personally, if I could afford it I'd have the M5.I hate the image of BMWs but it's a far more sophisticated machine than the VXR8 or Monaro and you have to respect its engineering.

AM04ARO

3,646 posts

238 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
In truth there is not a lot of difference between any of the Harrop SC cars running in excess of 9 PSI including the VXR8.

The SC VXR8 is the car VX should have made, all IMHO

ads_green

838 posts

255 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
The M5 is no doubt a stunning machine and for the gadget nerd (like me :-)) it's a dream.
It's a great drive and is wonderful engineering - I still don't like the SMG gearbox but it's great fun when pushing it.

But... 65k. For once it's a German car that doesn't need options (I only wanted the bluetooth kit and it's 500quid). Also the real world MPG is nearer 12-15 than 19 and don't get me started on the insurance (4 times the VXR8)

So is it worth 30k more than the VXR8... tough call. For me peronsally.. no. But hey, life would be dull if we all picked the same thing

anonymous-user

77 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
But is it slower than a 600bhp Monaro or VXR8? I bet up to 120mph it isn't. The one thing I've learned about my SC CV8 is the power difference becomes most apparent as speeds become ridiculous and I bet the relatively low torque figure actually helps the BMW get off the line quicker.

I still love my Monaro but a car that spins all its power away up the road and cannot go around corners is not fast IMHO.

Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 12th February 21:59

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
caspy@wortec" Target="_blank">class="forumQuoter">caspy@wortec said:
One isnt slower than yours!! wink
Hook line and sinker...biggrin

J. J.

832 posts

240 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Who really cares what the results are?
Having read the Pistonheads thread, HSV boys give a good account of themselves.



Anyhow, can't wait to see the results!

Demon Hill

368 posts

263 months

Wednesday 13th February 2008
quotequote all
wormus said:
I still love my Monaro but a car that spins all its power away up the road and cannot go around corners is not fast IMHO.
Agree

caspy@wortec

141 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th February 2008
quotequote all
Demon Hill said:
wormus said:

I still love my Monaro but a car that spins all its power away up the road and cannot go around corners is not fast IMHO.


Agree


Remember it is not a Monaro, the VXR8 has much more rubber on the ground and much better traction. 0-60 in 4.4 and 0-100 in 9 secs aint bad, especially on far from ideal conditions.

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Wednesday 13th February 2008
quotequote all
caspy@wortec" Target="_blank">class="forumQuoter">caspy@wortec said:
Demon Hill said:
wormus said:
I still love my Monaro but a car that spins all its power away up the road and cannot go around corners is not fast IMHO.
Agree
Remember it is not a Monaro, the VXR8 has much more rubber on the ground and much better traction. 0-60 in 4.4 and 0-100 in 9 secs aint bad, especially on far from ideal conditions.
ahem.... I have 285/30 zr 20 on the rear, you have wider rubber then me still... (say yes and Im going 345!)

anonymous-user

77 months

Wednesday 13th February 2008
quotequote all
I wonder at what point your diff/drive shafts etc will fail, afterall the standard tyres are 245?

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Wednesday 13th February 2008
quotequote all
wormus said:
I wonder at what point your diff/drive shafts etc will fail, afterall the standard tyres are 245?
Im sure I will hear it when they do! biggrin Good excuse to tube the back end then though and go 345's. smokin

paul.APO

27 posts

218 months

Thursday 14th February 2008
quotequote all
caspy@wortec said:
Demon Hill said:
wormus said:

I still love my Monaro but a car that spins all its power away up the road and cannot go around corners is not fast IMHO.


Agree


Remember it is not a Monaro, the VXR8 has much more rubber on the ground and much better traction. 0-60 in 4.4 and 0-100 in 9 secs aint bad, especially on far from ideal conditions.


What were the far from ideal conditions....was there a report on this?....0-100 time looks a little hot.

petrolzed

182 posts

219 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
You can respect the M5's Engineering, but you can't love it like a Monaro.

BO55 VXR

4,373 posts

274 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all

jumplead

1,823 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all
For those of you that don't read the PH homepage the VXR8 roadtest has been done.

http://www.pistonheads.com/roadtests/doc.asp?c=47&...

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Thursday 21st February 2008
quotequote all

J. J.

832 posts

240 months

Monday 25th February 2008
quotequote all
Just re-watched the Top Gear/Clarkson review on the standard VXR8. If you've forgotten or not seen it, it really sort of ends the argument. Well worth a re watch!