Drive line losses
Author
Discussion

gareth h

Original Poster:

4,194 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
I've recently replaced the monaro with an E46 M3, now the Monaro should have been making 400bhp and measured just over 300bhp on the rollers, the M3 should make 340bhp ish and apparantly they show 270-280 on the rollers, is the monaro driveline that much less efficient than the beemer?

S600VXR

5,877 posts

223 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Yes

Nice BM BTW!

gareth h

Original Poster:

4,194 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
BTW ??

ringram

14,701 posts

271 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
What makes you think the Monaro is 400bhp anyway?

Personally forget fwhp and just look at the rwhp. Otherwise take the engine out and put it on an engine dyno.

gareth h

Original Poster:

4,194 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Only going by what Mr Monkfish and Mr Wortec tell us, I agree it's only rwhp which is relevant, however they are directly affected by whatever the transmission losses are, on that example if the monaro losses were similar to the beemer it would be seeing another 30 ish bhp at the rear wheels.
Just an observation I found interesting.

moosepig

1,306 posts

264 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
gareth h said:
BTW ??
Internet shorthand for By The Way.

Ferb

3,112 posts

233 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Drive line losses are about 20-25%

ringram

14,701 posts

271 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
I believe wortec use a different dyno for their figures so arnt necessarily related to the one you are looking at.
Hence why there is no point searching for something which may or may not exist (ie lost power)

The topic has been done to death loads before. Basically forget fwhp figures and go by rwhp only. Jez never made the power his was claimed to have on vixpy's dyno. Different dyno's different numbers. All irrelevant smile

granada203028

1,500 posts

220 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
If you compare the performance figures for Monaro's and VXR8s against the more potent BMWs, the BMWs do seem to come out on top for a given power to weight ratio. So parhaps the Germans are more honest with their horse power sorry Pferdestärke.

global-i

368 posts

239 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
if you are that interested there is some science here www.pumaracing.co.uk/trans.htm

gareth h

Original Poster:

4,194 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
What a well written, easy to follow article, thanks, does anybody know the cd for a monaro?

global-i

368 posts

239 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
My gearbox is being rebuilt at present, whilst its apart I opted to have the internals polished for the following reasons.
1: Reduced Friction, Vibration and Noise.
2: Improved gear change.
3: Less transmission Loss.
4: Reduction in Transmission oil Temperature.
My plan comes unravelled a bit here as I don’t have a dyno sheet from before the polishing to compare it with.
However it will be interesting to see how the overall losses compares to others at the dyno day later this year.

Magic919

14,178 posts

224 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
gareth h said:
What a well written, easy to follow article, thanks, does anybody know the cd for a monaro?
0.31.

monkfish1

12,245 posts

247 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
gareth h said:
I've recently replaced the monaro with an E46 M3, now the Monaro should have been making 400bhp and measured just over 300bhp on the rollers, the M3 should make 340bhp ish and apparantly they show 270-280 on the rollers, is the monaro driveline that much less efficient than the beemer?


Sounds about on the money. In answer to your qestion, yes it is less efficient. In fact the evidence i have accumalated suggests even more so than dynos suggest. Some porsches are down at 12% drivetrain loss, but a monaro is not a BMW or a Porsche.

monkfish1

12,245 posts

247 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
global-i said:
My gearbox is being rebuilt at present, whilst its apart I opted to have the internals polished for the following reasons.
1: Reduced Friction, Vibration and Noise.
2: Improved gear change.
3: Less transmission Loss.
4: Reduction in Transmission oil Temperature.
My plan comes unravelled a bit here as I don’t have a dyno sheet from before the polishing to compare it with.
However it will be interesting to see how the overall losses compares to others at the dyno day later this year.


Id suggest a fair chunk of the issue lies in the diff rather than the gearbox. Be interesting nonetheless as you are the first person i know of to do this.

global-i

368 posts

239 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Roger, I am inclined to agree with you. I did read some claims of 15 rwhp and 15 lbft gains from polishing the crown wheel and pinion.
I have a spare diff with a 3.91 in it, just need to decide on a replacement LSD type before giving it a try.

Ferb

3,112 posts

233 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
global-i said:
Roger, I am inclined to agree with you. I did read some claims of 15 rwhp and 15 lbft gains from polishing the crown wheel and pinion.
I have a spare diff with a 3.91 in it, just need to decide on a replacement LSD type before giving it a try.

Go for a kazz 2way diff thumbup

ringram

14,701 posts

271 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Weld it, mini spool smile You know you want to!

15bhp gains are nothing to be sneezed at. Was that on a 3000bhp drag car though? (ie) What percentage gain?

granada203028

1,500 posts

220 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Took the diff appart from my Mk2 Granada. After 174,000 miles it appeared to have nicely polished its self.

tiler

693 posts

259 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
global-i said:
My gearbox is being rebuilt at present, whilst its apart I opted to have the internals polished for the following reasons.
1: Reduced Friction, Vibration and Noise.
2: Improved gear change.
3: Less transmission Loss.
4: Reduction in Transmission oil Temperature.
My plan comes unravelled a bit here as I don’t have a dyno sheet from before the polishing to compare it with.
However it will be interesting to see how the overall losses compares to others at the dyno day later this year.