How Big is Yrs?
Discussion
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2. 
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...

http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...
S600VXR said:
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2.
www.partsworldperformance.com/product_details.php?category_id=178&item_id=939
www.partsworldperformance.com/product_details.php?category_id=178&item_id=939
Errr, no! Anything can be made to fit, though the emmisions test could be tricky

S600VXR said:
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2.
www.partsworldperformance.com/product_details.php?category_id=178&item_id=939
If anyone can Roger its you
www.partsworldperformance.com/product_details.php?category_id=178&item_id=939
However HOW MUCH
ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine
Edited by Bonnie and Clyde on Thursday 9th July 22:27
monkfish1 said:
S600VXR said:
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2. 
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...
Errr, no! Anything can be made to fit, though the emmisions test could be tricky 
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...


Real petrol heads shop here and bring engines back to the uk in their hand luggage
www.rehermorrison.com/
www.rehermorrison.com/
wilsog said:
Real petrol heads shop here and bring engines back to the uk in their hand luggage 
http://www.rehermorrison.com/
Looks like a parts shop but good at packaging. Did you get a small block in your suitcase or one in each hand for that natural balanced gait
http://www.rehermorrison.com/

S600VXR said:
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2. 
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...
Dont be showing Richard silly n/a engines like that lol
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...
Good in the US where engine bays are huge, weight doesnt matter, and fuel is almost free.
I think I'll stick with an LS motor though
Someone's been watching Overhaulin' a bit too much!
That 572 is some beast... love to see one this side of the pond
I think that ringram dude is getting into people's heads, talking cubes and such, like it's all about who has the most displacement! I tell you, it's about how you use it and how hard you blow! But still love those red rocker covers.. awesome power plant!
That 572 is some beast... love to see one this side of the pond
I think that ringram dude is getting into people's heads, talking cubes and such, like it's all about who has the most displacement! I tell you, it's about how you use it and how hard you blow! But still love those red rocker covers.. awesome power plant!
Yeah stick with Lsx mate.
Buy your new engine here http://www.erlperformance.com/index.php?option=com...
These guys have an excellent reputation.
8.2L engine is waiting for you!
Is 900ftlb and BHP enough NA?

Buy your new engine here http://www.erlperformance.com/index.php?option=com...
These guys have an excellent reputation.
8.2L engine is waiting for you!
Is 900ftlb and BHP enough NA?

Edited by ringram on Friday 10th July 08:49
Mel said
"ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine"
Clearly depends on which tape measure you use: only sure way is to measure it on both tape measures back to back! Ps, bonnet up or bonnet down?? (Was that bonnet or did I mean helmet?
L.O.L.
"ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine"
Clearly depends on which tape measure you use: only sure way is to measure it on both tape measures back to back! Ps, bonnet up or bonnet down?? (Was that bonnet or did I mean helmet?
L.O.L.
ringram said:
Yeah stick with Lsx mate.
Buy your new engine here http://www.erlperformance.com/index.php?option=com...
These guys have an excellent reputation.
8.2L engine is waiting for you!
Is 900ftlb and BHP enough NA?

Something strange there....but that looks like horrific power delivery.Buy your new engine here http://www.erlperformance.com/index.php?option=com...
These guys have an excellent reputation.
8.2L engine is waiting for you!
Is 900ftlb and BHP enough NA?

Edited by ringram on Friday 10th July 08:49
J. J. said:
Mel said
"ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine"
Clearly depends on which tape measure you use: only sure way is to measure it on both tape measures back to back! Ps, bonnet up or bonnet down?? (Was that bonnet or did I mean helmet?
L.O.L.
"ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine"
Clearly depends on which tape measure you use: only sure way is to measure it on both tape measures back to back! Ps, bonnet up or bonnet down?? (Was that bonnet or did I mean helmet?
L.O.L.

SimonV8ster said:
It jumps 250 bhp in 250 rmp ?? What ?? Think I best go back down the pub........
Im betting they didnt get on the throttle until around 5000rpm. Also thats a lot, so its might have been on NOS..EFA
"Maybe I can find and post the dyno video. This one is solid after being a dyno mule for testing intakes and cams all on pump gas. The stock LS7 intake, LS7 head, pump gas set-up was just over 700 HP and 650 tq. in this mild set-up. With a 250 NOS shot it made 922 HP and just over 900 ft/lbs. all below 6300. What a street sleeper since the idle and lack of FI wouldn't indicate 900 HP,900 ft/lb on tap.
With the sheet metal intake it has spun up to 7300 (thanks to the bulletproof Carrillo rods,Wiseco pistons) to see where it quit making power since it was still climbing at 6300. That 7300 was with a 4.5 stroke, no dry sump, hydraulic lifters. The lifters are bushed and lengthened to improve the oil pressure.
We are installing a similar LS7 head/ intake version in a 2005 GTO as a sleeper. I guess we'll see if the tires will work as a fuse or the IRS can handle the massive torque. His plan is to keep as stock appearance as possible and have a crazy driver with all that off idle HP and tq.
We are producing these and have the cranks, but from doing some calculating makes it obvious that the other 9.7 and 9.8" "tall deck" blocks are better suited for shorter strokes. This motor showing at SEMA last year put the pressure on to handle a 4.5 stroke in their "tall blocks". The 6.8 rod/ 4.5 stroke/ long sleeve in this engine eliminates the skirt scuffing, side loading, piston rock and oil burning typical in stroker motors. I know a hundred people are going to say that theres works great, but you have to admit the ideal set-up leaves the piston in the bore, not in the crankcase. You even have room to run a full round skirt for big HP applications, since reluctor wheel clearance isn't an issue.
The pat pending deckplate design actually improves head gasket sealing and cooling over a typical solid deck. That is how we have small 2L (120 ci) turbo motors making 900 whp with ridiculous cylinder pressures that are sealing with (4) 11mm head bolts per cylinder, no o-ring, MLS gaskets on what was originally a 1.6L block.
It would be interesting to see if the head mfg.'s or porters are looking at unshrouding the valves for big bore blocks like this, our other 4.200 bore std. deck height block and the cast iron GM coming? Their looks to be a great deal to be gained in flow from looking at the LS7 heads with the exhaust valve tight to the chamber wall and the spark plug in the way. The intake would benefit as well."
Edited by ringram on Saturday 11th July 09:50
Bonnie and Clyde said:
S600VXR said:
Dont suppose this will bolt straight in inplace of my LS2. 
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...
If anyone can Roger its you
http://www.partsworldperformance.com/product_detai...

However HOW MUCH

ETA I was very disappointed when i clicked on this link to discover it was about an engine

Me too and i thought i was going to win something for a change

Edited by Bonnie and Clyde on Thursday 9th July 22:27
Gassing Station | HSV & Monaro | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



