How easy (or not) would it be to put an LS2 into a LS1 car?
How easy (or not) would it be to put an LS2 into a LS1 car?
Author
Discussion

after_shock

Original Poster:

8,751 posts

251 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
Dont ask me why as its a daft question I know but had this floating around in my mind recently, how universal are these LS engines between the different versions.

For example if you had a CV8 with an LS1 in and simply wanted to fit an LS2 out of a VXR model how easy or difficult would it be to do, whats the actual differences or would it just drop straight in including mounts and ecu etc?

Sames goes for replacing an LS2 with an LS3, easy as above or the same or harder?

anonymous-user

85 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?

Well_Fans

4,193 posts

255 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
is it not just the reluctor wheel(?) thing on end of the crank 24x 58x thingy, electronic throttle swap for cable and leads to convert injectors to do the swap?

after_shock

Original Poster:

8,751 posts

251 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
wormus said:
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?


I wouldnt want to it was just a daft idea had in my head and it keeps coming back lol

True with the LS1 one but if you modified the LS2 or LS3 then they are a head again.

ringram

14,702 posts

279 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
Main issue is reluctor wheel as mentioned. But there is also some messing around required, but usually extentions and converter cables are cheaply available. You can run a 58x in a 24x with a converter unit, but the ozzies say they are unreliable.
Better to get the engine with the right reluctor.
E40 LS2's are 24x if that helps. Later E38 ones and LS3's are 58x
Just buy a Gen4 engine with a 24x reluctor and it will bolt right in.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

241 months

Sunday 21st March 2010
quotequote all
wormus said:
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?
I love this argument. An ls1 modded can make more than a 2 or 3? Can it make more than a modded 2 or 3? I can bet a modded 1 with the same output as a stock 3 would be no where near as nice to drive. I'd rather have an unmodded 3 if its all the same as I prefer to see my car on my drive than gathering dust in a workshop.

There is simply no replacement for displacement

ringram

14,702 posts

279 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
There is simply no replacement for displacement
Amen

after_shock

Original Poster:

8,751 posts

251 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
ringram said:

E40 LS2's are 24x if that helps. Later E38 ones and LS3's are 58x
Just buy a Gen4 engine with a 24x reluctor and it will bolt right in.


Reluctor wheels are new to me!!

How do you know which version of the LS2 you have?

So you could simply take an LS3 and drop it into a later E38 LS2 car in theory?

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

291 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
The ECU will be specific to the trigger wheel. Also, I could be wrong but are 58 toothed wheels accompanied by a grey couloured pickup?

stevieturbo

18,105 posts

278 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
wormus said:
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?
Electrically are easy if you choose the mechanicals right. ie. Reluctor.

As for power. There is little argument that the LS2/3 platforms are better bases and will produce power easier than the older LS1/6 units so your suggestion is just plain wrong.

ringram

14,702 posts

279 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
Maybe fundamentally not much different. But more displacement and better heads, and in the case of the LS3 a better intake mean they start off with an advantage over the older LS1 stuff.

Monaro LS2's are 24x I think, while vxr8's are 58x
E40 ECU on LS2 Monaro's and E38 on vxr8's (& LS7 and 2010 Camaro's, basically all the cool cars! Only the rubbish ones with small boots get the E40.)

MyM8V8

9,468 posts

226 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
I have an LS2 in my GTS. smile

ARAF

20,759 posts

254 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
after_shock said:
wormus said:
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?
I wouldnt want to it was just a daft idea had in my head and it keeps coming back lol
True with the LS1 one but if you modified the LS2 or LS3 then they are a head again.
I think Wormus has been banghead for so long at this one, that the arguement has been truncated.
My take on his arguement is that for less than the cost of a transplant, you could upgrade an LS1 to produce more power than an LS2/3 (though I don't know how true the arguement is).

As to the 'unreliable' or 'unuseable' tags, I don't buy that on an LS1 engine pushing 400bhp at the flywheel.

TerryS

1,382 posts

279 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
ARAF said:
As to the 'unreliable' or 'unuseable' tags, I don't buy that on an LS1 engine pushing 400bhp at the flywheel.
The GTS-R LS1 were 400 bhp from the factory using a slightly higher lift Callaway cam & ported 241 heads & a mafless system.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

241 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
thought I read somewhere the ls3 can use either or

ringram

14,702 posts

279 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
Either or what? 24x or 58x?

Just depends on what reluctor is attached, they all come with 58x. But you can change it or build one in an LS3 block with a 24x if you want. Though why you wouldnt use a 4" crank at the time I dont know. Might as well make it a 416 cuber!

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
wormus said:
My guess is the engines are interchangable but the electrics are not. Ecms, Bcms etc are specific to each model. Anyway, why would you want to when an LS1 can produce more power than an LS2 or LS3 with the correct mods?


Electrically are easy if you choose the mechanicals right. ie. Reluctor.

As for power. There is little argument that the LS2/3 platforms are better bases and will produce power easier than the older LS1/6 units so your suggestion is just plain wrong.


Of course I'm not suggesting if you have and LS2 or LS3 you should throw it away and buy an LS1, that would be dumb. However, there is no reason a modified LS1 cannot produce as much power as you'll ever need as you well know, especially with FI. I do accept it's more difficult if you plan to stick with NA.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

241 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
it would have been nice if one of you big power guys had at least got the ls3 in the mix to see what its really like

north of watford

336 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
So apart from the reluctor ring issue and the throttle cable can the LS2 or LS3 be used as a LS1 replacement? What else would need to be changed or would it just bolt in?

LuS1fer

43,565 posts

276 months

Monday 22nd March 2010
quotequote all
The standard LS6 has 405hp. "Standard" is just the state of tune determined by the factory.