Your thoughts on value
Your thoughts on value
Author
Discussion

GG33

Original Poster:

1,224 posts

222 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
Would like to see what you think on the potential value of a genuine low mileage 2002 Tamora. 19000 miles.

Recent quality respray in Rolex Blue, New full leather interior by D&C recently rebuilt engine (3.6) with RND stage 2 head, modified oilways, bigger valves stage 2 cams. new clutch etc. A beautiful looking car but no pics yet.

Clearly a nice example. but the car was registered as a Cat C in 2002. It has been properly repaired (10 years ago) and had no chassis damage.

I realise some of you wouldn't touch a CAT car, whereas others wouldn't be put off by it. If you are one of those nay-sayers, please dont respond with a silly low figure. I just would like feedback on what you would expect to see this car advertised for?

Cheers

SteveSPG

2,120 posts

223 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
i saw a cat d listed car for sale by a dealer (hexham) i believe. a few months back

was up for 12.5.

dean had a cat d up for 10.9.

gives you a ballpark for what "dealers" were looking at.

ChrisPap

395 posts

175 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
Always a hard one. People that don't understand the mechanicals of cars will say it's worthless, or say the market dictates it's worthless.

If there was no chassis damage, or it's been repaired good as new, then there is no problem and it wouldn't put me off. I believe if the car is well looked after and has been repaired well, there's every chance it's a better proposition than an average factory finished car.

I wouldn't judge prices on the TVR Dean car, his bad reputation on here means he struggles to sell anything and had to keep dropping the price. I've seen 2 Cat D T350's sell for 15-16,000, not seen any damaged Tams myself.

You could look at getting the CATegorisation removed by an inspection?

What would the car be worth without a damage history?

Whitenoise1

197 posts

160 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
Who did the rebuild? Cat C brings price down but if its a full engine rebuild by a reputable company I'd say add couple of grand value and probably a grand for retrim and same for a respray. I'd say 14k as list price. Puts its up against other cars that aren't cat C but haven't had all the work done you've listed. I think you'd be lucky to get more than 15k for salvage repaired car.

Just my opinion.

GG33

Original Poster:

1,224 posts

222 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
thanks for the opinions. I forgot to mention the engine bay is well detailed. The rebuild was done by Batty and RND engineering did the head work. My thoughts are with the mileage and condition / full leather re-trim and re-spray it would be up there with the top Tams (excluding the 4.3/4.5 convesions. Less whatever would be taken off for the Cat C?

I hadnt thought about having the classification removed...How does that work?

TA14

14,011 posts

279 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
GG33 said:
thanks for the opinions. I forgot to mention the engine bay is well detailed. The rebuild was done by Batty and RND engineering did the head work. My thoughts are with the mileage and condition / full leather re-trim and re-spray it would be up there with the top Tams (excluding the 4.3/4.5 convesions. Less whatever would be taken off for the Cat C?

I hadnt thought about having the classification removed...How does that work?
Paperwork technicality - it will always have a history of damage.

Value 20 to 35% less than without damage depending on the view of the buyer/seller.

HULLCHRIS

6 posts

154 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
You bought your car from tvr dean, how much did you pay for it?? and how much do you think its worth now??
ChrisPap said:
Always a hard one. People that don't understand the mechanicals of cars will say it's worthless, or say the market dictates it's worthless.

If there was no chassis damage, or it's been repaired good as new, then there is no problem and it wouldn't put me off. I believe if the car is well looked after and has been repaired well, there's every chance it's a better proposition than an average factory finished car.

I wouldn't judge prices on the TVR Dean car, his bad reputation on here means he struggles to sell anything and had to keep dropping the price. I've seen 2 Cat D T350's sell for 15-16,000, not seen any damaged Tams myself.

You could look at getting the CATegorisation removed by an inspection?

What would the car be worth without a damage history?

ChrisPap

395 posts

175 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
HULLCHRIS said:
You bought your car from tvr dean, how much did you pay for it?? and how much do you think its worth now??
Not exactly applicable. I bought my car with fibreglass damage needing repair and a respray, not as a roadworthy car, although otherwise it was in outstanding condition.

It would cost me 25-30k to replicate the project depending on availability of a base car, so I wouldn't sell it for less than that, but I didn't build it with resale in mind, and I'm sure someone would come along and tell me that the car would never drive the same again since the fibreglass got dented, that I've ruined a Tam, and they wouldn't give me toffee for it etc.
I did think about asking a price on the forums for insurance valuation but I anticipated that the stupid answers would only infuriate me! smile

SergSC

508 posts

183 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
I went to see a cat car a year ago. I only considered it because there were many photographs of the accident damage. Unfortunaly the interior was very tatty.

Basically I think people are more likely to consider it, as in take steps to at least view it, if they are sure of just how light or heavy the damage was. We know these things get easily Cat'ed for only cosmetic reasons, but it could just as easily have had wheels hanging off and be in the same category.

Barry Ashcroft

1,958 posts

242 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
It was 10 years ago it now means nothing. The car should be judged in it's current condition and as you describe it that's top money. Would not worry me in the slightest.

RedSpike66

2,342 posts

233 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
The problem is the percentage of people that would buy a Cat C/D car...

A number of buyers are unbelievably anal about mileage on a fantastic condition, regularly driven, regularly maintained, no expense spared TVR, so the fact that so few people would buy a Cat C/D car must affect it's value, whether it's had chassis damage or just fibreglass damage.

Those that are happy to buy a Cat C/D car will be much more interested in a well repaired, well cared for, and improved car like yours though, so making it one of the easier ones to sell in this 'category'

good40

286 posts

165 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
RedSpike66 said:


A number of buyers are unbelievably anal about mileage on a fantastic condition, regularly driven, regularly maintained, no expense spared TVR,
In other words they want it all...Hunter Gold watch with guarantee for 50 pence.
There are so many wasters"Buyers" who mainly read silly internet forums & then have unrealistic expectations .ie: lower than average miles,driven regularly without a hint of a stone chip or slightly marked engine bay? Full service history & any other thing flickering inside light etc then expect 20% off ?

Session

252 posts

201 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
A lovely 4.5 SS Tam with no cat c/d history went a while back after being advertised at £28k with 3/4 years engine warranty so you will be looking at significantly less.

Edited by Session on Friday 24th May 11:32

S3DaveP

160 posts

282 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
ChrisPap said:
Not exactly applicable. I bought my car with fibreglass damage needing repair and a respray, not as a roadworthy car, although otherwise it was in outstanding condition.

It would cost me 25-30k to replicate the project depending on availability of a base car, so I wouldn't sell it for less than that, but I didn't build it with resale in mind, and I'm sure someone would come along and tell me that the car would never drive the same again since the fibreglass got dented, that I've ruined a Tam, and they wouldn't give me toffee for it etc.
I did think about asking a price on the forums for insurance valuation but I anticipated that the stupid answers would only infuriate me! smile
Far from it Chris, I think you car looks great and you have saved another TVR, a double win in my book, can't help think its the car that the Griffith should have evolved into.

Also Cat C or D have been applied to some cars with really light damage, anyway if its repaired correctly the I don't see a problem and it would not put me off. Its not like a full steel bodied car that's been pulled back into shape, that's never to be as strong as before accident....

Dischordant

603 posts

222 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Personally if it saved me about 3k off normal price I'd be happy to buy a repaired cat c/d (if I was looking)

Walford

2,259 posts

187 months

Friday 24th May 2013
quotequote all
Cat D is a joke on TVR speed six cars, basically if it don't run after the fender bender its Cat D