Naughty Aston owner!
Naughty Aston owner!
Author
Discussion

stevewushu

Original Poster:

733 posts

231 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 24 September 2013 at 22:48

bomberh

634 posts

167 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
The idiot driver just couldn't be bothered to send their no claims information and inform their insurance company of a change of address, kncensoredb.

So the driver/owner got £300 FPT and 6 points on their licence. So when their insurance comes up for renewal and they declare the points and what they are for, their insurance is going to go sky high. Yep the owners a kncensoredb

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
Shall we guess who the insurer was who nullified the policy ?? biggrin

GTDB7

958 posts

198 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
Agreed the driver should have notified the Insurance Comp etc.. but it's also a little anal and red tape.

If he's paying or paid his premium and the insurance has accepted the payment/s, then they should at least provide some form of legal cover to drive. If or when a claim was made, then the Insurance can tell him to go do one and simply not pay out.

So what I'm saying is unless outright refusal to insure is in force then you should be covered by at least a 3rd party cover until all the details are obtained and verified.

I'd like to know the little details though before making a final judgement!

Had the Ins Comp notified the driver in writing etc that his policy was Void! ???

Or was this a decision made during a phone call made by the Police! ??

If a change of address was made then how long ago was this carried out?
Days, Weeks, Months??

I'm sure at some point in our lives we have all overlooked or missed something, luckily most of the time we get to correct it before anything bad happens.




Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
Last I heard, the correct procedure in this instance is for a 7 day ticket for the owner to provide evidence of insurance confused

Perhaps this has lapsed too ?????

CPBRI

392 posts

179 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
Supercar? confused

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
CPBRI said:
Supercar? confused
Agreed yes

peterr96

2,226 posts

205 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
Jockman said:
CPBRI said:
Supercar? confused
Agreed yes
Compared to your Corsa? Yes I think so!

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
peterr96 said:
Compared to your Corsa? Yes I think so!
Can't disagree with you there Pedro !!

Upon my return from Espanol I shall look to update my picture to include my corsa and bike. Might even include myself avec Assos mankini smile

V12PJN

47 posts

189 months

Tuesday 3rd September 2013
quotequote all
The Insurer or their Agent is required to send a 7 day cancellation letter to the Insured's last known address. This is normally done by recorded delivery.

yeti

10,695 posts

305 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Easy to fall foul... I go to work on the train generally but once or twice a month I drive if its sunny and I've a late start.

Found out due to a thread on S, P & L that I wasn't insured for this as SDP only. I thought commuting was a daily thing but its if you EVER drive to a permanent place of work.

Now changed, and for free, but that came as a shock to me as I'd been technically uninsured.

Speculatore

2,003 posts

265 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Not insurance but I was very nearly caught out with the 10 year expiry on your digital driving licence. (Section 4b is the expiry date).

I didn't get any notification from DVLA...It was pointed out a couple of weeks ago when I hired a car in Edinburgh.

sjp63

1,997 posts

302 months

Wednesday 4th September 2013
quotequote all
Presume the insurers were writing to him at his old address telling him he was not insured because he hadn't sent NCB proof? But if they were asking for NCB proof then that suggests he was using the insurer for the first time - so why would they have the wrong address?
Had they also returned his premium I wonder?
Was his V5 up to date?
People who deliberately don't buy insurance deserve what this guy has got, but It's not clear in this story that he was deliberately avoiding paying. All very well for the BiB to make a big splash about this, but does it really target the right audience (ie those who have no intention of getting insurance)