Quicksilver exhaust for V8 vantage
Quicksilver exhaust for V8 vantage
Author
Discussion

Amv

Original Poster:

13 posts

174 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Any V8 vantage owners with the quicksilver exhaust? Trying to decide between the sport or the super sport version for a 2013 V8. Any excessive cabin noise with the super sport? Any feedback would be appreciated.

burntout

1,390 posts

184 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Supersport all day long.......... That's what I have and it sounds amazing....

GlynV8

350 posts

201 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
I have a Quiksilver Sports exhaust gathering dust in my garage looking like new. Too loud for me since I had manifolds and sports cats fitted, so now on standard back box. Give me a shout if you are interested.

RIB27

564 posts

178 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
I had SuperSport fitted a month or two ago. I was concerned it might be too loud or drone on the motorway but it's perfect - deeper than stock, quite a bit noisier when you put your foot down but not ridiculously loud at slow speeds that it sounds silly.

I uploaded a video for you but it doesn't really do it justice as I was driving like a bit of a granny in the damp conditions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GICRF-GFJ8

robgt

2,587 posts

192 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.

robgt

2,587 posts

192 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.

jonby

5,367 posts

187 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
robgt said:
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?

RIB27

564 posts

178 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
jonby said:
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?
Totally appreciate Rob's point of view, but I'm in the boat described by Jonby - I wanted a little more volume but am not really bothered about performance gains - the car is quick enough for how I drive anyway. I bought the exhaust with low miles on it from another PH'er who found it too loud in combination with sports cats, so for < £1k I got the result I was after.

Neil1300R

5,768 posts

208 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
robgt said:
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.
Rob, the OP is in the USA - no BR there!

PiloteAM

868 posts

240 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
jonby said:
robgt said:
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?
True, but you can just change the cats, about £1.5 including fitting (from memory), louder and more power, plus easier to put back to stock if you want to sell.

jonby

5,367 posts

187 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
PiloteAM said:
jonby said:
robgt said:
Sorry to bleat on about this but I see little point in fitting a noisy rear silencer with little or no performance gain. Change the manifolds and cats (Bamford Rose) and retain the standard silencer. That way you get a huge performance gain plus the ability to switch off the noise and run in stealth mode.
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?
True, but you can just change the cats, about £1.5 including fitting (from memory), louder and more power, plus easier to put back to stock if you want to sell.
agree totally, but I was referencing the manifolds suggested

robgt

2,587 posts

192 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
jonby said:
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?
Take your point Jonby though using your price comparison, to change the manifolds and cats would appear to be something of a bargain. Approx 40BHP gain, more torque, reduced fuel consumption plus a glorious sound combined with an on off switch as opposed to permanent noise and no other gain. Just my opinion of course and I will admit to being a tiny bit biased. biggrin

Neil1300R

5,768 posts

208 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
burntout said:
Supersport all day long.......... That's what I have and it sounds amazing....
Whats it like on long journeys / motorways though? Sounds amazing but very loud - at least it did last time I heard it in the Hindhead tunnel

jonby

5,367 posts

187 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
robgt said:
jonby said:
It's not for everyone of course - I fully understand your point of view. But some people really love an increase in volume. If so, you are comparing a cost of £1-2k for a new backbox to £4-5k for new manifolds - surely you can see why that solution is better for some ?
Take your point Jonby though using your price comparison, to change the manifolds and cats would appear to be something of a bargain. Approx 40BHP gain, more torque, reduced fuel consumption plus a glorious sound combined with an on off switch as opposed to permanent noise and no other gain. Just my opinion of course and I will admit to being a tiny bit biased. biggrin
I agree in terms of performance/price ratio. I am a fan of BR's work. But no matter how good the value, a BR manifold conversion involves a lot more money. I understand a lot of people simply won't spend that kind of cash, no matter what the value, on an aftermarket enhancement. In fact that's why I didn't go down the route with BR on my car - the total cost just got out of hand, regardless of how good the value was.







Impasse

15,099 posts

271 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
robgt said:
Take your point Jonby though using your price comparison, to change the manifolds and cats would appear to be something of a bargain. Approx 40BHP gain, more torque, reduced fuel consumption plus a glorious sound combined with an on off switch as opposed to permanent noise and no other gain. Just my opinion of course and I will admit to being a tiny bit biased. biggrin
Your idea of a bargain is somewhat different to mine. £5k + VAT + fitting for the system. I see that as very expensive plumbing for nominal gain. A bargain it is not. Value for money it may be, depending on your point of view.

Amv

Original Poster:

13 posts

174 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Thank you for all the feedback. Yes I live in the US so have limited options on getting stuff. I wish Bamford Rose had a distributor over here, have not found anything yet and shipping to US would be costly.

I realize that just changing out the exhaust is purely to improve the sound with no noticeable power gains. Like all of us I have a budget but want to get the best results for the least amount of $$$ hehe

X7LDA

940 posts

234 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Your idea of a bargain is somewhat different to mine. £5k + VAT + fitting for the system. I see that as very expensive plumbing for nominal gain. A bargain it is not. Value for money it may be, depending on your point of view.
+1

The thing that staggers me the most about this forum is just how much people pay for things from a couple of supplies due to their reputation. And the quality is no different from what I have witnessed first hand.

snuffy

13,292 posts

314 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
Impasse said:
Your idea of a bargain is somewhat different to mine. £5k + VAT + fitting for the system. I see that as very expensive plumbing for nominal gain. A bargain it is not. Value for money it may be, depending on your point of view.
I agree with that as well. £6k or so for 40 horses is not good value to me either. I'd like more power in my V8V, but not at 150 sheets per pony.

robgt

2,587 posts

192 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
snuffy said:
I agree with that as well. £6k or so for 40 horses is not good value to me either. I'd like more power in my V8V, but not at 150 sheets per pony.
Well thats that sorted then! I still think that to be able to nudge your V8 close to V12 performance for that amount is still a bargain . Should you wish to sell the car sometime in the future there would be a pile of people wishing to purchase the parts so that could be used to offset the initial purchase price.

snuffy

13,292 posts

314 months

Friday 13th December 2013
quotequote all
robgt said:
snuffy said:
I agree with that as well. £6k or so for 40 horses is not good value to me either. I'd like more power in my V8V, but not at 150 sheets per pony.
Well thats that sorted then! I still think that to be able to nudge your V8 close to V12 performance for that amount is still a bargain . Should you wish to sell the car sometime in the future there would be a pile of people wishing to purchase the parts so that could be used to offset the initial purchase price.
So I take my 380bhp V8, spend £6k on it and get it to 420bhp and I'm almost at the same performance level as the V12 510bhp version. Really ?