Insurance on appreciating cars
Insurance on appreciating cars
Author
Discussion

divetheworld

Original Poster:

2,565 posts

165 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
So, as the title says. I took out GAP when I got the V12V and have a reasonable comp policy but as time goes on, I see values rising and my protection becoming more and more ineffective. I don't need a crystal ball to know that the insurance company is unlikely to pay out the post increase market value without a fight.
So what do people do with a car that isn't old enough to be a classic and also protect themselves from the insurance company that will want to rigorously protect themselves from paying out?

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Not sure I understand. Insurance will pay out market value. If you're not happy with that you get evidence to fight your corner.

If you believe the market value of your car is appreciating then what is the need for GAP?

divetheworld

Original Poster:

2,565 posts

165 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Jockman said:
Not sure I understand. Insurance will pay out market value. If you're not happy with that you get evidence to fight your corner.

If you believe the market value of your car is appreciating then what is the need for GAP?
Oh I agree the GAP is now redundant. It took out GAP because the cars were not appreciating at the time.
Relating to the normal road risks insurance, the guide price doesn't reflect the cost to replace the car in most cases. But in the case of DBS/V12V at the moment, the replacement cost is going up way faster than the guides.
I suppose your point is one where you could go to your dealer and other sources to provide evidence of the current replacement costs and fight your corner with no guarantee of success. I would certainly prefer to harden my position before hand with a policy that assures me of a favourable outcome.
My query, to which your answer is a valid one, is "is there an economically reasonable way to assure the right payout in the event of a total loss?"

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
I would keep the GAP policy. Is it a return to invoice or replacement vehicle one?

Just had a quick peak at the current DBS prices and they are about £4K less than this time last year.

bogie

17,100 posts

302 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
You pay a small premium for agreed value, and usually need photos and a dealer valuation letter to prove. Then there is no messing about if you have a total loss. (speaking from experience, well worth having for a special car)

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
bogie said:
You pay a small premium for agreed value, and usually need photos and a dealer valuation letter to prove. Then there is no messing about if you have a total loss. (speaking from experience, well worth having for a special car)
Thing is bogie me old China you would usually state the invoice price as the agreed valuation.

Brent's dilemma is that even this may not be enough if his cars are rising in value.

RobDown

3,807 posts

158 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
I dont see any difference with a classic car. Find an insurer like locktons that will do an agreed valuation. They will likely ask for an approved valuation; get an aston dealer to give you that. Simples

divetheworld

Original Poster:

2,565 posts

165 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Jockman said:
I would keep the GAP policy. Is it a return to invoice or replacement vehicle one?

Just had a quick peak at the current DBS prices and they are about £4K less than this time last year.
Return to invoice, so the V12V worth about £15k more than the policy right now!!

Edited by divetheworld on Sunday 27th March 14:17

AMDBSNick

7,221 posts

192 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
It really isn't like the old days when "Glasses Guide" was the bible on valuation. With the wealth of information available to all insurers pretty much offer "current market value" immediately. Agreed value is all good and well until you total the car 364 days into the policy year only to find out values have increased by 10%. You could of course call your broker on a weekly basis with an update. wink

Flugplatz

1,955 posts

275 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Jockman said:
Brent's dilemma is that even this may not be enough if his cars are rising in value.
I paid an additional premium mid policy to up my agreed value on the 991 GT3.

I then reduced it as they were falling and got a refund smile

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
divetheworld said:
Jockman said:
I would keep the GAP policy. Is it a return to invoice or replacement vehicle one?

Just had a quick peak at the current DBS prices and they are about £4K less than this time last year.
Return to invoice, so the V12V worth about £15k more than the policy right now!!

Edited by divetheworld on Sunday 27th March 14:17
Ah I see your problem mate. If it had been replacement vehicle (about £30 more on the GAP) this would have solved all your problems. It's a nice problem to have !!!!!! wink

Murph7355

42,019 posts

286 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Why do people bother with gap insurance?

You're effectively saying your current insurer/insurance isn't good enough. Why not just find a better principal insurer and forgo the hassle, extra tax etc etc etc? And as Bogie says, get it on agreed value and away you go.

Of course if things jump wildly through the year you'd need to adjust. But frankly on all modern, still available stuff I simply don't see that being a material problem no matter what sticker prices might say.

bogie

17,100 posts

302 months

Sunday 27th March 2016
quotequote all
Jockman said:
bogie said:
You pay a small premium for agreed value, and usually need photos and a dealer valuation letter to prove. Then there is no messing about if you have a total loss. (speaking from experience, well worth having for a special car)
Thing is bogie me old China you would usually state the invoice price as the agreed valuation.

Brent's dilemma is that even this may not be enough if his cars are rising in value.
I thought it was a used car, rather than a new one. If its really rising in value from year to year and there are market examples of this, then surely regular car insurance will pay out enough ? although you will have more hassle claiming than you would with agreed value...

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Why do people bother with gap insurance?

You're effectively saying your current insurer/insurance isn't good enough. Why not just find a better principal insurer and forgo the hassle, extra tax etc etc etc? And as Bogie says, get it on agreed value and away you go.

Of course if things jump wildly through the year you'd need to adjust. But frankly on all modern, still available stuff I simply don't see that being a material problem no matter what sticker prices might say.
I used to think the same Andy. When I looked into GAP it was soooooo cheap for the peace of mind I thought it worthwhile.

When you look at it, 5 years guarantee on a £95k car costs 23p per day, far cheaper than agreed valuation. Plus the agreed valuation would not be £95k in year 5.