Stoichiometric Ratio
Discussion
1 gram of petrol mixed with 14.7 grams of air, equals 656 bhp and happy days.
Add water to taste, oh no, hydrolock.
I am sure this unfortunate gentleman must have said, "I don't know what I was thinking".
Perhaps the red shorts could suggest, taking a short cut to arrive at an AMOC meeting on time.
Was there a sign, 'Danger, YouTubers ahead'?
The video of this has been doing the rounds on Facebook and Instagram over the last few days. It’s been posted in a few of the AM Facebook groups in the hope the culprit will identify himself. I suspect that’s unlikely unless someone recognises him, but the question has to be asked, why oh why would anyone do this? Total stupidity imho. BRM.
Reminiscent of the old Rufford Ford shenanigans before the spoilsport council blocked it off.
Why would anyone do this? With any car, but especially that....
One can only assume their understand of the consequences is non-existent. You might expect someone with that car might have a modicum of understanding, and even if not, would you not think "I don't risk it". You don't need a deep understanding of engines...or arguably any understanding at all...to work out it's probably not a good idea....
Why would anyone do this? With any car, but especially that....
One can only assume their understand of the consequences is non-existent. You might expect someone with that car might have a modicum of understanding, and even if not, would you not think "I don't risk it". You don't need a deep understanding of engines...or arguably any understanding at all...to work out it's probably not a good idea....
Not deep, nor as high as the exhausts, but I assume higher than the air intakes. He's not entirely ignorant of what's occurred so surprising that he took the risk.
Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
5s Alive said:
Not deep, nor as high as the exhausts, but I assume higher than the air intakes. He's not entirely ignorant of what's occurred so surprising that he took the risk.
Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
Obviously not built to the same spec as the Lotus "Wet Nellie"Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
5s Alive said:
Not deep, nor as high as the exhausts, but I assume higher than the air intakes. He's not entirely ignorant of what's occurred so surprising that he took the risk.
Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
Proof that money and brains don't always go together.Best comment: "the names Pond, James Pond".
https://x.com/i/status/2071115352709206470
dkatwa said:
Why doesn't the council build a small bridge?
What a brilliant idea.
We could submit a tender for £20 million to the council.
It would be necessary to include many pages about diversity, inclusiveness and whatever that E stands for, so they know our bid is genuine.
Enclose a Pride flag, perhaps also a brown envelope and it is essential to outline a net zero policy. Always best to say zero emissions will be achieved in 2030, they are fixated about that date. It is only calculated net, so we can still carry on as usual, as long as we buy a few of those offsetting certificates from BYD.
When they accept our bid, I can ask an Army engineer that I know, who can arrange to put a metal bridge up in one day, for £250,000.
We can erect one of those road signs stating 'SIGN NOT IN USE', councils like that.
Jon39 said:
What a brilliant idea.
We could submit a tender for £20 million to the council.
It would be necessary to include many pages about diversity, inclusiveness and whatever that E stands for, so they know our bid is genuine.
Enclose a Pride flag, perhaps also a brown envelope and it is essential to outline a net zero policy. Always best to say zero emissions will be achieved in 2030, they are fixated about that date. It is only calculated net, so we can still carry on as usual, as long as we buy a few of those offsetting certificates from BYD.
When they accept our bid, I can ask an Army engineer that I know, who can arrange to put a metal bridge up in one day, for £250,000.
We can erect one of those road signs stating 'SIGN NOT IN USE', councils like that.
They're recursive.
If the sign is not in use, then you ignore what it says....which means it IS in use....which means you take notice of what it says....which means it's NOT in use...etc etc
Jon39 said:
dkatwa said:
Why doesn't the council build a small bridge?
What a brilliant idea.
We could submit a tender for £20 million to the council.
It would be necessary to include many pages about diversity, inclusiveness and whatever that E stands for, so they know our bid is genuine.
Enclose a Pride flag, perhaps also a brown envelope and it is essential to outline a net zero policy. Always best to say zero emissions will be achieved in 2030, they are fixated about that date. It is only calculated net, so we can still carry on as usual, as long as we buy a few of those offsetting certificates from BYD.
te?Gassing Station | Aston Martin | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff