Daytime running lights on the Vantage

Daytime running lights on the Vantage

Author
Discussion

Gatso

Original Poster:

227 posts

241 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Anybody considered changing the function of the Vantage Lights to DRL?

Basically they arn't really a side light as such, more a DRL anyway.

Would be a simple mod, on with ignition and side light switch on, rears off.

Might take a look, Rick you got V8V Electrical schematics?

GlynMo

1,140 posts

251 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
Why would you want to? If on-coming traffic can't see the car, they're unlikely to see the lights! wink

Gatso

Original Poster:

227 posts

241 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
haha yea, got them on my daily Q5, purley a form over function with the Aston, they look sooo nice!

bogie

16,440 posts

274 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
personal preference I guess...im sure soon it will be law to have DRL on all cars

...to be honest, if its a bit dull, I often drive dipped beam all the time anyway, force of habit being a lifelong biker, and driving on the continent a lot

GlynMo

1,140 posts

251 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
bogie said:
...to be honest, if its a bit dull, I often drive dipped beam all the time anyway, force of habit being a lifelong biker, and driving on the continent a lot
Moi aussi.

Edited by GlynMo on Friday 28th May 18:29

mikey k

13,014 posts

218 months

Friday 28th May 2010
quotequote all
bogie said:
personal preference I guess...im sure soon it will be law to have DRL on all cars

...to be honest, if its a bit dull, I often drive dipped beam all the time anyway, force of habit being a lifelong biker, and driving on the continent a lot
Already on it's way
Hence the sudden "popularity" of them on new cars
Way ahead of their time those Swedes!
I'd just leave the dips on all the time (also being an ex biker and high mileage CO car driver) still doesn't stop numpties missing you!

Jay_Davis

272 posts

180 months

Sunday 30th May 2010
quotequote all
Too bad having DRLs don't actually make anything safer and can actually cause more problems than they solve.

The reason they "work" in Canada and Sweden is that large parts of those countries are far to the north and have a large percentage of their daylight time actually being dusk like conditions.

FYI: If you want to make something invisible during bright daylight, you put bright lights on them.

Gatso

Original Poster:

227 posts

241 months

Sunday 30th May 2010
quotequote all
not sure how many millions you have put into testing this or whether Audi/Porsche et al engineers would agree with you but as I said it is purely on looks not the safety reasons.tongue out

freddie4

31 posts

180 months

Monday 31st May 2010
quotequote all
Ok for motorbikes and captain sensible in his volvo. But leave the daily lights to the 'hello I've got a ? poseurs and the chavs with their halfords extras.

JohnG1

3,474 posts

207 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
mikey k said:
bogie said:
personal preference I guess...im sure soon it will be law to have DRL on all cars

...to be honest, if its a bit dull, I often drive dipped beam all the time anyway, force of habit being a lifelong biker, and driving on the continent a lot
Already on it's way
Hence the sudden "popularity" of them on new cars
Way ahead of their time those Swedes!
I'd just leave the dips on all the time (also being an ex biker and high mileage CO car driver) still doesn't stop numpties missing you!
Genuine question - what's the point of DRLs in the UK? Nordic countries I can see the benefit.

GlynMo

1,140 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
JohnG1 said:
mikey k said:
bogie said:
personal preference I guess...im sure soon it will be law to have DRL on all cars

...to be honest, if its a bit dull, I often drive dipped beam all the time anyway, force of habit being a lifelong biker, and driving on the continent a lot
Already on it's way
Hence the sudden "popularity" of them on new cars
Way ahead of their time those Swedes!
I'd just leave the dips on all the time (also being an ex biker and high mileage CO car driver) still doesn't stop numpties missing you!
Genuine question - what's the point of DRLs in the UK? Nordic countries I can see the benefit.
Just more intrusive, one-size-fits-all, scensorede legislation. And to justify some euro politician's existence. Off topic: did you see how much is being spent equipping all MEPs with iPads?? furious

clorenzen

3,689 posts

237 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
Daytime driving lights are a huge advantage - not only during dusk but because you can actually distinguish a moving car from a parked car so when going down country lanes you can see whether anything is comming towards you or whether it is parked at the kerb.

However i hate the Audi and Porsche DDLs as they actually blind you so here it is more a fashion statement than a practicality.


Edited by clorenzen on Tuesday 1st June 14:06

GlynV8

325 posts

173 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
When I had my Audi RS4 I never used the daytime running lights, but had the lights switched to auto. This ensured that the lights came on as soon as the light was poor, but not in bright sunshine. It was good for tunnels too. This is a much better solution IMO.
In fact auto lights and auto wipers is something I miss on my V8 Vantage, it is a shame it is not offered as an option.

GlynMo

1,140 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
GlynV8 said:
When I had my Audi RS4 I never used the daytime running lights, but had the lights switched to auto. This ensured that the lights came on as soon as the light was poor, but not in bright sunshine. It was good for tunnels too. This is a much better solution IMO.
In fact auto lights and auto wipers is something I miss on my V8 Vantage, it is a shame it is not offered as an option.
Your V8V's not an auto by any chance? You'll want a driver next! rolleyes

Edited by GlynMo on Tuesday 1st June 15:47

GlynV8

325 posts

173 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
GlynMo said:
Your V8V's not an auto by any chance? You'll want a driver next! rolleyes

Edited by GlynMo on Tuesday 1st June 15:47
No it's a manual. Changing gear is a joy and adds to the driving experience. Fiddling with electrical switches, when there is no need in 2010 is a distraction.
I accept that my opinion may not be the same as others. There may be people out there who get great pleasure from adjusting the intermittent wipe to perfectly match the rainfall.

GlynMo

1,140 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st June 2010
quotequote all
GlynV8 said:
GlynMo said:
Your V8V's not an auto by any chance? You'll want a driver next! rolleyes

Edited by GlynMo on Tuesday 1st June 15:47
No it's a manual. Changing gear is a joy and adds to the driving experience. Fiddling with electrical switches, when there is no need in 2010 is a distraction.
I accept that my opinion may not be the same as others. There may be people out there who get great pleasure from adjusting the intermittent wipe to perfectly match the rainfall.
I'm not one of them, but to suggest that moving your hand a couple of inches to activate a switch is a 'distraction' infers that you are always driving at 10 10ths or you have trouble doing two things at once wink

Much as I looooove my V8V, pedalling either the Westfield or the MGA is a much purer driving experience.

Jay_Davis

272 posts

180 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2010
quotequote all
clorenzen said:
Daytime driving lights are a huge advantage - not only during dusk but because you can actually distinguish a moving car from a parked car so when going down country lanes you can see whether anything is comming towards you or whether it is parked at the kerb.

However i hate the Audi and Porsche DDLs as they actually blind you so here it is more a fashion statement than a practicality.


Edited by clorenzen on Tuesday 1st June 14:06
Huh? If you're on a street that is so thin you need lights to tell you if a car is parked or not, then you are going too fast on that street. DRL's are a distraction and a waste of energy. From a visibility standpoint, it would actually be more effective to force all cars to be bright fluorescent red. Wouldn't use power or burn through bulbs either. That next on the safety gestapo list?

You want safe roads? Get everyone to stop using cell phones, texting, and being drunk while driving. You'll save over 50k lives a year in the US alone. Once we save those lives, get back to me about DRLs.

Stuart Dickinson

998 posts

209 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2010
quotequote all
Jay_Davis said:
Too bad having DRLs don't actually make anything safer and can actually cause more problems than they solve.

The reason they "work" in Canada and Sweden is that large parts of those countries are far to the north and have a large percentage of their daylight time actually being dusk like conditions.

FYI: If you want to make something invisible during bright daylight, you put bright lights on them.
80% of the Canadian population lies within 150km of the Canada/US border - the 49th Parallel, which is on the same latitude as Paris.

Jay_Davis

272 posts

180 months

Thursday 3rd June 2010
quotequote all
Stuart Dickinson said:
Jay_Davis said:
Too bad having DRLs don't actually make anything safer and can actually cause more problems than they solve.

The reason they "work" in Canada and Sweden is that large parts of those countries are far to the north and have a large percentage of their daylight time actually being dusk like conditions.

FYI: If you want to make something invisible during bright daylight, you put bright lights on them.
80% of the Canadian population lies within 150km of the Canada/US border - the 49th Parallel, which is on the same latitude as Paris.
Yes, I know. I just means that the light in Canada is similar to that in the U.K. That's why I quoted "work" because it is just what the Canadians state, not that its a fact. I also wasn't trying to prove anything one way or the other about northern countries that don't have it. It just means using data based on their experience doesn't apply to the vast majority of the planet that's south of there, like the US.


Stuart Dickinson

998 posts

209 months

Thursday 3rd June 2010
quotequote all
Jay_Davis said:
Stuart Dickinson said:
Jay_Davis said:
Too bad having DRLs don't actually make anything safer and can actually cause more problems than they solve.

The reason they "work" in Canada and Sweden is that large parts of those countries are far to the north and have a large percentage of their daylight time actually being dusk like conditions.

FYI: If you want to make something invisible during bright daylight, you put bright lights on them.
80% of the Canadian population lies within 150km of the Canada/US border - the 49th Parallel, which is on the same latitude as Paris.
Yes, I know. I just means that the light in Canada is similar to that in the U.K. That's why I quoted "work" because it is just what the Canadians state, not that its a fact. I also wasn't trying to prove anything one way or the other about northern countries that don't have it. It just means using data based on their experience doesn't apply to the vast majority of the planet that's south of there, like the US.
Sorry, I was just being a pain in the ass anyway... smile