Economical daily driver, but a bit fun - any Jap suggestions
Economical daily driver, but a bit fun - any Jap suggestions
Author
Discussion

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
My track car plans have been put on hold briefly as someone wrote off my daily driver on Monday. frown

I need a replacement - budget is up to £7k for something special, but preferably a lot cheaper! The main issue is economy - I'm looking for the best part of 40mpg (assuming it's petrol, 50+ if it's diesel thanks to Mr Brown's taxes) and a decent motorway cruise. Insurance has to be reasonable after Monday, so sadly no Integras and such like.

It needs to be big enough to hold one (preferably two) mountain bike frames in the back, but I'd prefer something reasonably compact. I'm looking at things like the bog standard 1.6 Focus and wondered if there might be some more exciting suggestions.

An old Civic VTi sprang to mind, but they're something like group 15 insurance for some reason!

Marf

22,907 posts

264 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
An old Civic VTi sprang to mind, but they're something like group 15 insurance for some reason!
Great fun, very reliable, not massively fast but enough to have some fun, but use the VTEC and they are quite thirsty for a 1600. I had an EG6 VTI with basic breathing mods and a Quaife ATB, loved it.


odyssey2200

18,650 posts

232 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Marf said:
Chris71 said:
An old Civic VTi sprang to mind, but they're something like group 15 insurance for some reason!
Great fun, very reliable, not massively fast but enough to have some fun, but use the VTEC and they are quite thirsty for a 1600. I had an EG6 VTI with basic breathing mods and a Quaife ATB, loved it.
in everyway the 16i-16 twin cam was just as quick and just as reliable in the real world.

a bit under rated and therefore a bit cheaper to buy.

If you can find/run to a Beat they are a hoot around town and back roads.
660cc V-Tec screamer Go Kart

Never drove one on a motorway though so couldn't comment

Marf

22,907 posts

264 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
Marf said:
Chris71 said:
An old Civic VTi sprang to mind, but they're something like group 15 insurance for some reason!
Great fun, very reliable, not massively fast but enough to have some fun, but use the VTEC and they are quite thirsty for a 1600. I had an EG6 VTI with basic breathing mods and a Quaife ATB, loved it.
in everyway the 16i-16 twin cam was just as quick and just as reliable in the real world.

a bit under rated and therefore a bit cheaper to buy.
To be fair your right, in the real world the 1616 will likely be more usable as you wont be caught off cam overtaking etc and you'll be stirring the gearbag less, but personally, I'd take the VTEC over the straight 16v. Theres nothing like the noise the VTEC makes when you have a hard intake pipe on it driving

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

232 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
Marf said:
odyssey2200 said:
Marf said:
Chris71 said:
An old Civic VTi sprang to mind, but they're something like group 15 insurance for some reason!
Great fun, very reliable, not massively fast but enough to have some fun, but use the VTEC and they are quite thirsty for a 1600. I had an EG6 VTI with basic breathing mods and a Quaife ATB, loved it.
in everyway the 16i-16 twin cam was just as quick and just as reliable in the real world.

a bit under rated and therefore a bit cheaper to buy.
To be fair your right, in the real world the 1616 will likely be more usable as you wont be caught off cam overtaking etc and you'll be stirring the gearbag less, but personally, I'd take the VTEC over the straight 16v. Theres nothing like the noise the VTEC makes when you have a hard intake pipe on it driving
I spent 6 years working for Honda Uk and always tried to get a CRX or Vtec civic as a company car.

We had a slightly breathed of ECU that had the rev limiter removed.
I managed to "borrow" it and had it in a 4Door VTI civic.

I always changed up at about 11000rpm out of sympathy and the change in noise when vtec comes in is addictivesmile

OH had a 16i-16 which was a quick car.

Marf

22,907 posts

264 months

Friday 11th July 2008
quotequote all
lol 11,000 RPM biggrin

If I had to trade down from my MR2 Turbo now for something cheaper to run I'd probably pick an SiR Civic. Had my VTi not been written off by some old get not looking and pulling out on me it would either have had a frankenstein nasp engine built for it, or I'd have forged the B16, dropped the compression a bit and added a GT28R.

Edited by Marf on Friday 11th July 19:34

daveknott5

738 posts

242 months

Saturday 12th July 2008
quotequote all
How about a 2003-4 MR2? A much underrated car. Superb chassis, direct steering and handling, playful on the limit, and 38mpg - maybe more if driven gently, + you can go to Silverstone Performance later down the line and drop a Toyota approved turbo conversion into the mix to achieve 230Bhp and a better power-weight ratio than a Boxster S!

Hongkongfooi

636 posts

270 months

Saturday 12th July 2008
quotequote all
Honda integra type R......nuff said.

Wadeski

8,853 posts

236 months

Saturday 12th July 2008
quotequote all
daveknott5 said:
How about a 2003-4 MR2? A much underrated car. Superb chassis, direct steering and handling, playful on the limit, and 38mpg - maybe more if driven gently, + you can go to Silverstone Performance later down the line and drop a Toyota approved turbo conversion into the mix to achieve 230Bhp and a better power-weight ratio than a Boxster S!
but unless his mountain bike frames are Action Man sized, not much usewink

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
daveknott5 said:
How about a 2003-4 MR2? A much underrated car. Superb chassis, direct steering and handling, playful on the limit, and 38mpg - maybe more if driven gently, + you can go to Silverstone Performance later down the line and drop a Toyota approved turbo conversion into the mix to achieve 230Bhp and a better power-weight ratio than a Boxster S!
but unless his mountain bike frames are Action Man sized, not much usewink
Fraid so.

The ITR is very tempting too, but the insurance companies (and the fuel stations) will laugh at me! I need something reasonably cheap to insure with the bets part of 40mpg.

Have just ha da brain wave though - how about the recent shape 140hp Celica? Ticks all the boxes - room for a bike with the seats down, bit more fun than the usual hatch and a colleague who has one reckons he gets 40mpg on the motorway.

stuno1

1,359 posts

218 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
You considered a skoda fabia VRS??? 45MPG and up to 49MPG on the motorway, re-map and econemy remains the same but the BHP goes from 130 to approx 175!!!

I had one of these and you can pick up a good example at 3-4 years old for 5k so sounds spot on for your requirements?

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
stuno1 said:
You considered a skoda fabia VRS??? 45MPG and up to 49MPG on the motorway, re-map and econemy remains the same but the BHP goes from 130 to approx 175!!!

I had one of these and you can pick up a good example at 3-4 years old for 5k so sounds spot on for your requirements?
Yep, considering one. There don't seem to be many for sale locally though and those I've seen have been £6k+. If I saw a good one I'd be very tempted.

istoo

2,365 posts

225 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
very similar to my current thoughts.
I came up with the gen7 Celica as well ,which will return 40+ on long runs by all accounts pretty light too..

Honda beat smile just a tad too small, ruled out smart roadster for the same reasons.

Graeme_Gman

353 posts

222 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Just read this after sending you an email about the Celica. I would certainly reccomend the Fabia too if you could stretch to it, but they do seem to hold their values quite well for a poor VAG relation car.wink I used to have one, that wasn't quite standard and loved every minute of it. Seriously regret selling it now.

heebeegeetee

29,832 posts

271 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Wadeski said:
daveknott5 said:
How about a 2003-4 MR2? A much underrated car. Superb chassis, direct steering and handling, playful on the limit, and 38mpg - maybe more if driven gently, + you can go to Silverstone Performance later down the line and drop a Toyota approved turbo conversion into the mix to achieve 230Bhp and a better power-weight ratio than a Boxster S!
but unless his mountain bike frames are Action Man sized, not much usewink
When in the peak district once i saw a chap carrying a full size bike with his caterham.

Where there's a will there's a way.

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Graeme_Gman said:
Just read this after sending you an email about the Celica. I would certainly reccomend the Fabia too if you could stretch to it, but they do seem to hold their values quite well for a poor VAG relation car.wink I used to have one, that wasn't quite standard and loved every minute of it. Seriously regret selling it now.
Cool, I'll investigate that once I get back into work (should really swap my PH email addresses!)

The Fabia sounds encouraging and I've always been impressed with the VAG diesels I've driven, but it is a lot of money, plus there aren't a lot around.

996TT-MAC

67 posts

224 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
I have went for an evo can get 25 mpg on my daily commute and its alot of fun lol... not the most economical but alot more fun than an oil burner

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Tuesday 15th July 2008
quotequote all
996TT-MAC said:
I have went for an evo can get 25 mpg on my daily commute and its alot of fun lol... not the most economical but alot more fun than an oil burner
Definitely, but I've already got fun covered with my TVR, I need something economical, but just interesting enough that I don't resent getting in it.

mark_mcd

629 posts

226 months

Wednesday 16th July 2008
quotequote all
Dont know what size of car you need but have you considered a Suzuki Ignis Sport? I have one and it's great fun - a bit more 'raw' than some of the modern warm hatches (I like to think it's a bit like a modern 106 Rallye with airbags). Engine is quite punchy and great fun over 4000rpm where the vvt 'rasp' kicks in. Handles great too as long as you ensure it has decent rubber fitted (having the standard sticky Yokohama tyres fitted is a bonus!). EASILY get a tidy, low mileage 2003/4/5 car for under £4k. I get 35mpg with mine and thats with plenty town driving and the odd b road blast so driving sensible would get high 30's mpg easily. Something a bit different that's cheap to run, reliable and will put a grin on your face when required. Just a thought.

Edited by mark_mcd on Wednesday 16th July 13:08

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,548 posts

265 months

Thursday 17th July 2008
quotequote all
mark_mcd said:
Dont know what size of car you need but have you considered a Suzuki Ignis Sport? I have one and it's great fun - a bit more 'raw' than some of the modern warm hatches (I like to think it's a bit like a modern 106 Rallye with airbags). Engine is quite punchy and great fun over 4000rpm where the vvt 'rasp' kicks in. Handles great too as long as you ensure it has decent rubber fitted (having the standard sticky Yokohama tyres fitted is a bonus!). EASILY get a tidy, low mileage 2003/4/5 car for under £4k. I get 35mpg with mine and thats with plenty town driving and the odd b road blast so driving sensible would get high 30's mpg easily. Something a bit different that's cheap to run, reliable and will put a grin on your face when required. Just a thought.

Edited by mark_mcd on Wednesday 16th July 13:08
Hmmm, might have a peruse on Autotrader. It's likely to be a bit small for me and a little full on for (mostly) motorway miles, but I like the idea! I'll take a look. smile