Z4M Coupe or Z4 3.0 Sport Coupe? Best to own???
Z4M Coupe or Z4 3.0 Sport Coupe? Best to own???
Author
Discussion

dasherdiablo1

Original Poster:

4,489 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
I've previously had a Z4 3.0 Sport Coupe and really liked the way it drove (once I changed the tyres to Micheline Run Flats). I have puit a deposit on a Z4M Coupe that I am supposed to be collecting from the dealer tomorrow.

However, I am having second thoughts as the running costs for the M are much higher than for the 3.0 Sport (servicing, tax & insurance - also fuel but not too worried about this as won't use it very often). The fact it won't be used much is what is making me question the higher running costs, at least if we were using it alot we would be getting our moneys worth.

Lots of research thsi week has revealed that the M is not easy to live with unless being prepared to get stuck in each time you use it.

Has anyone owned both that could offer their opinion to help me make the right decision?

Gruber

6,313 posts

245 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
I've owned both.

The only thing that makes the M "more difficult to live with" is the CDV issue with the gearbox - a bit of a nuisance in stop start traffic, but really no biggy.

In every other area, the M is better. To my mind, worth the extra money. But there are some fairly vocal people on here who disagree (although to the best of my knowledge, none of them have actually owned both!).

Whichever you get, they're great cars.

I do think the M looks more modern, with the sculpted bonnet, if looks matter to you.

ETA: In the M, I never pulled up next to a 3.0 and thought "I wish I still had that one".



Edited by Gruber on Thursday 4th August 13:01

D6GMB

187 posts

207 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Nobody can really answer which one is best.Its really down to which one you want to own.
I have previously owned a 2.5 z4 roadster and now own a Z4MR.In my opinion you cant compare
any other z4 to the M and yes it is considerably more expensive to run,but if you want better performance,handling,steering,brakes and exclusivity then buy the M.
I dont use mine everyday as i work offshore so my anual mileage is about 6k so this makes running the M a lot more viable than if it was a daily driver.
Surely you must have driven the M?,so must be able to tell whether it is for you or not?.

p4cks

7,539 posts

230 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
I own a Z4C and my best friend has a Z4MC so other than me owning both I like to think I am in a good position to comment.

For me, the performance difference between the M and the 3.0 did not and does not justify the extra cost (cost as in petrol, servicing, purchase cost, consumables etc). For others it may be different, however for me the 3.0 is quite sufficient.

paulmon

2,209 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
p4cks said:
I own a Z4C and my best friend has a Z4MC so other than me owning both I like to think I am in a good position to comment.

For me, the performance difference between the M and the 3.0 did not and does not justify the extra cost (cost as in petrol, servicing, purchase cost, consumables etc). For others it may be different, however for me the 3.0 is quite sufficient.
Its not all about the 0-60 and dragstrip times though is it. Someone recently listed the difference between the two cars component wise and the list was substantial.



mitchk

109 posts

229 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
I've previously owned a 2.5 z4, a Alpina Roadster S and a Z4M

best to own ? Z4M no question

dasherdiablo1

Original Poster:

4,489 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
paulmon said:
p4cks said:
I own a Z4C and my best friend has a Z4MC so other than me owning both I like to think I am in a good position to comment.

For me, the performance difference between the M and the 3.0 did not and does not justify the extra cost (cost as in petrol, servicing, purchase cost, consumables etc). For others it may be different, however for me the 3.0 is quite sufficient.
Its not all about the 0-60 and dragstrip times though is it. Someone recently listed the difference between the two cars component wise and the list was substantial.
Does anyone have a link to this list?

gaz1234

5,233 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
M.

milu

2,514 posts

297 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Something like:
Bumpers,Bonnet,exhaust,suspension,brakes,steering system,wheels,tyres, oh and the Engine!

dasherdiablo1

Original Poster:

4,489 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
milu said:
Something like:
Bumpers,Bonnet,exhaust,suspension,brakes,steering system,wheels,tyres, oh and the Engine!
Also gearbox!

milu

2,514 posts

297 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
hmmmm not sure about gearbox....

ClintonB

5,060 posts

244 months

Thursday 4th August 2011
quotequote all
Driven neither (but would like an M and would happily consider the vanilla option). However, reading your original post, it almost sounds like neither is your best option TBH.
Low miles and having already done the Z4 Coop thing, are you going to get enough out of the M, or are you better off going down a different road and getting something a little more extreme?

Vroomer

1,889 posts

211 months

Sunday 7th August 2011
quotequote all
This topic comes up almost every week!

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0...

physprof

996 posts

218 months

Sunday 7th August 2011
quotequote all
as vroomer says....

but I'll chip in that the Z4M is a daily driver - I've put 36K on in 2yrs 10 months.


a340driver

632 posts

186 months

Monday 8th August 2011
quotequote all
I've covered 3500miles during the first 3 months in a Z4M Roadster and love it. Very different to the 3.0L's I test drove. If you want fast with a harsh ride go for 3.0L, If you want faster and better handling then M every time.