F30 review Autocar - Positive
F30 review Autocar - Positive
Author
Discussion

pattyg

Original Poster:

1,385 posts

258 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
A couple of quotes are as follows "A new world leader has landed" "It's amazing how mighty and how good the BMW is; never before has so much car been available for so little"

Sounds promising - if only it looked a little more dramatic.

M3Charlie

556 posts

189 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
"if superman drove a car it would be a 320d" lol

Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
M3Charlie said:
"if superman drove a car it would be a 320d" lol
Hopefully with the ever increasing price of diesel relative to petrol this will be the generation of 3 Series where everyone says 'No! I won't spoil my sport saloon with a diesel engine, I shall order the petrol one'.

No, really. Honest.

Doh frown

pits

6,704 posts

221 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
Fox- said:
Hopefully with the ever increasing price of diesel relative to petrol this will be the generation of 3 Series where everyone says 'No! I won't spoil my sport saloon with a diesel engine, I shall order the petrol one'.

No, really. Honest.

Doh frown
I wouldn't spoil any car by buying a diesel

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
i'll take your opinion with a pinch of salt until you've driven one smile

agree the dropping of the NA straight 6 is a sad time, however, the turbo units are great and they still found fantastic. the new 535i sounds lovely biggrin they're also even more user-friendly with a much bigger power band and, dare i say, far more linear power delivery because of a much flatter torque curve.

Cheib

25,472 posts

206 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
When I was reading this article it struck me that the F30 320 d with 181 hp puts out prety much the the same horse power as my E36 328i Sport did (193hp) in 1996....obviously has a lot more torque too. Incredible how the bottom of the range oil burner is now as powerful/more powerful than the top of the range car from three generations ago.

Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
Cheib said:
When I was reading this article it struck me that the F30 320 d with 181 hp puts out prety much the the same horse power as my E36 328i Sport did (193hp) in 1996....obviously has a lot more torque too. Incredible how the bottom of the range oil burner is now as powerful/more powerful than the top of the range car from three generations ago.
The 320d is not bottom of the range, or at least won't be for long. It's also not that amazing that a 2 litre turbo would make 180bhp either. VW had 150 from a 1.9 a decade ago.

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
A perfectly flat torque curve will give the most linear power delivery. I've not heard the new 28i engine but yes, you're right, it'll never sound like a straight 6. The 35i engine is a very good engine though and pulls well to its redline.

I'd like to see a power curve between the new 28i engine and say, a similarly powered 3.4 M30 and compare the torque and power curves.

I prefer the NA straight sixes but only for subjective reasons, from a technical point of view, they aren't as good.

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I agree, its the same for me. However, I bet 90% of bmw drivers (or any drivers, foe that fact) care more about objectives not subjective..... That's where the money is.

Also, this is largely out of BMW's hands with emission regulations. All manufacturers are doing the same, its unfortunate but it's happening.

sadlerj

856 posts

315 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
I just hope they make a F31 350D...will have one like a shot, keeping my eyes on the rumor mill!

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
just watched the review. i think positive is an understatement, he seemed to really like it!

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
That M5 is gorgeous. If you were in the market for a 2.0d why would you even think of it? Or listen to experts as it's raison d'etre is do far removed from that of the oil-burner? If people are as easily persuaded as that then no diesel would ever sell and everyone would be convinced by salesmen to buy X5Ms. I would rather have my E60 530d for everyday use than an M5, although I do hanker for the M badge as a weekend plaything.

Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
Simonium said:
I would rather have my E60 530d for everyday use than an M5
No you wouldn't. We all say this but only because of fuel economy. If fuel was 5p a litre you wouldnt drive a 530d. Nobody in Dubai drives a 530d.

Whether we care to admit it or not our car choices are almost always dominated by money. The diesel isnt better in the real world than an M5, its cheaper in the real world than an M5 and thats what it comes down to at the end of the day. We buy diesels instead of M5's because they cost less money.

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
Fox- said:
Simonium said:
I would rather have my E60 530d for everyday use than an M5
No you wouldn't. We all say this but only because of fuel economy. If fuel was 5p a litre you wouldnt drive a 530d. Nobody in Dubai drives a 530d.

Whether we care to admit it or not our car choices are almost always dominated by money. The diesel isnt better in the real world than an M5, its cheaper in the real world than an M5 and thats what it comes down to at the end of the day. We buy diesels instead of M5's because they cost less money.
yes

sad, but true. other than in running costs, a 530d isn't better than an M5 in any way.

cue the "but it's got more low down torque" response hehe

eastsider

1,102 posts

254 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
E38Ross said:
just watched the review. i think positive is an understatement, he seemed to really like it!
I read the autocar review in the mag last night, and stopped half way to check it wasn't one of those sponsored "advertorial" pieces, it was so gushing.
rolleyes

eastsider

1,102 posts

254 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
Fox- said:
No you wouldn't. We all say this but only because of fuel economy. If fuel was 5p a litre you wouldnt drive a 530d. Nobody in Dubai drives a 530d.
Spot on.

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
in all fairness (don't get me wrong, i'd take the E39 M5) most people don't want a car like that with big miles with no warranty. with a new car you know EXACTLY how much it'll cost you and is far easier to budget. also, you don't get seats in which other people have farted, you get a spec that YOU want, not what someone else wanted etc.

E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
or people want the latest technology and aren't fussed at all by the engine, except if it has enough poke to go from A to B and is good on fuel to stop repeated trips to the pumps.

as said, i'm pro slightly older 2nd hand cars to avoid depreciation, but it doesn't stop me understanding why people want newer cars.

all that said, if no-one bought brand new cars then we wouldn't be able to do what we think is the better option.

martin mrt

3,884 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
E38Ross said:
Fox- said:
Simonium said:
I would rather have my E60 530d for everyday use than an M5
No you wouldn't. We all say this but only because of fuel economy. If fuel was 5p a litre you wouldnt drive a 530d. Nobody in Dubai drives a 530d.

Whether we care to admit it or not our car choices are almost always dominated by money. The diesel isnt better in the real world than an M5, its cheaper in the real world than an M5 and thats what it comes down to at the end of the day. We buy diesels instead of M5's because they cost less money.
yes

sad, but true. other than in running costs, a 530d isn't better than an M5 in any way.

cue the "but it's got more low down torque" response hehe
But fuel is NOT 5p per litre, so in the real world he would still have and prefer the 530d

How anyone can compare a 520d to an M5 baffles me.





E38Ross

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 30th November 2011
quotequote all
martin mrt said:
E38Ross said:
Fox- said:
Simonium said:
I would rather have my E60 530d for everyday use than an M5
No you wouldn't. We all say this but only because of fuel economy. If fuel was 5p a litre you wouldnt drive a 530d. Nobody in Dubai drives a 530d.

Whether we care to admit it or not our car choices are almost always dominated by money. The diesel isnt better in the real world than an M5, its cheaper in the real world than an M5 and thats what it comes down to at the end of the day. We buy diesels instead of M5's because they cost less money.
yes

sad, but true. other than in running costs, a 530d isn't better than an M5 in any way.

cue the "but it's got more low down torque" response hehe
But fuel is NOT 5p per litre, so in the real world he would still have and prefer the 530d

How anyone can compare a 520d to an M5 baffles me.
that wasn't quite fox's point though, the 530d is the better car in the running costs only. you would have it over the M5 only in the situation where you can't afford the M5. it's the same with most cars though. the only reason i have a 728i is because i can't afford a 750iL, or a new 760Li.

i would rather have the 760Li as a daily though. i just can't afford it frown