Help valuing Z4
Help valuing Z4
Author
Discussion

neil-c

Original Poster:

489 posts

212 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Apologies if this breaks posting rules but I intend selling my Z4 privately and the online valuations seem a little low comparing to what I see in the classified ads. Was just wondering what the thoughts were on here.

2.5se 53 plate, 20K miles FBMWSH 1 owner, metallic, 18in alloys, sport suspension, heated seats, hardtop, mot and tax to aug, a few small stone chips and alloy scuffs consistent with age, probably needs new tyres in near future.

eastsider

1,102 posts

254 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Decent enough spec, but when you think about it plus point is low mileage, but major minus points are SE not Sport, and 2.5 which is a bit of a no-mans land engine.

Typical buyer of an 8 year old car like that is an enthusiast who will often want top engine (3.0) and most popular spec (Sport) especially on a sports car.

CYMR0

3,940 posts

231 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
neil-c said:
Apologies if this breaks posting rules but I intend selling my Z4 privately and the online valuations seem a little low comparing to what I see in the classified ads. Was just wondering what the thoughts were on here.

2.5se 53 plate, 20K miles FBMWSH 1 owner, metallic, 18in alloys, sport suspension, heated seats, hardtop, mot and tax to aug, a few small stone chips and alloy scuffs consistent with age, probably needs new tyres in near future.
A few small stone chips and alloy scuffs and needing new tyres - might be commensurate age, but not with mileage. I'd expect even an eight-year-old car with 20k to be nearly immaculate. Smart repair might make a low miler seem more believable.

What colour is it? Red with beige interior will do much worse than silver or grey with black.

It's summer, it's a low miler, and it's a good spec for an SE, although most will prefer a 3.0 Sport or a newer, 2.0. I'd still think that with the low mileage, and assuming it's not an horrendous spec, £7k is achievable if not in a huge hurry.


Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
There is no Sport spec on a 2003 Z4 - it didn't come until later and added almost nothing to the spec of the car, it was quite unlike a Sport 2003 3 Series with bodykit etc.

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

206 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I looked at a z4 the other day 03 just out of interest, it was really rough, bad paint , crap tyres, one silver headlight and one black one not nice at all, bottom of the barrel stuff £5995.
If yours is as good as you say it is I would probably advertise it for £6495 at least and hold out for a genuine buyer, I would have thought that having a smaller engine it may sell better in these economically challenging times.

Is it merlot by any chance?


Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
steve_bmw said:
I would have thought that having a smaller engine it may sell better in these economically challenging times.
There is nil difference in fuel consumption or tax between a 3.0i and a 2.5i.

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

206 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Fox- said:
steve_bmw said:
I would have thought that having a smaller engine it may sell better in these economically challenging times.
There is nil (not much)difference in fuel consumption or tax between a 3.0i and a 2.5i.
I know there's not much in it but for 90% of the population running a three litre is a no no, you only have to mention big engines these days and people run a mile.
Not everyone who wants a z4 is going to buy the biggest engine they can find!

Fox-

13,575 posts

277 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
steve_bmw said:
I know there's not much in it but for 90% of the population running a three litre is a no no, you only have to mention big engines these days and people run a mile.
A 2.5 litre engine is still 'a big engine' to this sort of person.

steve_bmw

1,591 posts

206 months

Road2Ruin

6,554 posts

247 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I bought a z4 a month ago and would only consider a 2.5 at a very good price. The only one I looked at had 22k miles, met blue and good spec inc elipsoid alloys, 2005. They wanted 8k for it but after looking at it I would have paid no more than £7400.

jaedba2604

4,098 posts

178 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
CYMR0 said:
A few small stone chips and alloy scuffs and needing new tyres - might be commensurate age, but not with mileage. I'd expect even an eight-year-old car with 20k to be nearly immaculate. Smart repair might make a low miler seem more believable.

What colour is it? Red with beige interior will do much worse than silver or grey with black.

It's summer, it's a low miler, and it's a good spec for an SE, although most will prefer a 3.0 Sport or a newer, 2.0. I'd still think that with the low mileage, and assuming it's not an horrendous spec, £7k is achievable if not in a huge hurry.
So you'd expect a 20k car to have no stone chips? do stones know when your car's done 50k and only start attacking the bumper / bonnet at that point? smile

and there's no reason why red will do worse than silver or grey, you may have less phone calls, but you'll also have less time wasters...

neil-c

Original Poster:

489 posts

212 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
As colour seems to be a hot topic, the car is dark blue with beige soft top and interior. The roof might not be to everyone's taste but it does stand out and with the hardtop in body colour it gives it a different look. Not sure if this affects value up or down!!