Alpina B3S your thoughts and advice please
Alpina B3S your thoughts and advice please
Author
Discussion

graemel

Original Poster:

7,218 posts

243 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
I thought I would seek advice from the experts on here.
A good few years back we owned a B3 3.3 switchtronic Coupe.
Which as good a car as it was it drank oil. Apparently an issue with the year 2000 engines. So fast forward a few years and I'm looking at buying a 2004 B3S switchtronic Coupe.
Are there any issues that you guys know of with this particular model. Is there anything specific I should look out for when I go to view the car. I presume the build quality will be much the same as the B3 3.3. The B3 3.3 was one of the best handling cars out of the box I have driven. I presume the B3S will be the same. I guess they still run the alpina suspension system.
Your thoughts and advice would be very much appreciated, thanks Graeme


Luca Brasi

885 posts

200 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
Mate of mine has one these, incredibly rare and wonderful cars.These can suffer from HG failure though and/or increased oil consumption. Some specific alpina parts can be quite pricey.

DennisCooper

1,340 posts

197 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
Hi,

For about a year(ish) my brother had a 2003 B3S convertible and they are indeed very nice cars. I only drove the car a few times and overall, I was relatively disappointed. It is quick for what it is, but you do need to extract the performance aspects from it by using the upper levels of the revs range. Normal pottering about speeds and it's of course fine, just like a normal E46 330i. Fuel consumption is a little heavier due to the Alpina levels of modifications to the engine.

Sorry I can't help with specific areas of potential concern, but as above, there are a few Alpina specific parts which, with more research can be evaluated in terms of if they're a genuine area of long term ownership concern or not. The Alpinaregister website would probably be a better place to find out from other owners about these things.

A lovely car on the whole though and does indeed feel more special than any non M E46!

Cheers, Dennis!

rumple

14,246 posts

177 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
Regarding oil consumption it seems to be common with M54 engines, BMW say a litre per 1000 miles is within tolerences, i dont know if this applies to the alpina lump it would have been comprehensively upgraded.

Frances The Mute

1,816 posts

267 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
The 'accepted' Alpina tolerance is as low as 625 miles per litre.

petrolveins

1,783 posts

199 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
I'm sure I've read in my 330i manual as low as 600 miles per litre is acceptable according to BMW. I certainly use about a litre per 1000, a mate with a 135i tells me it's even worse on that.

poshboyracer

57 posts

213 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
I think the oil consumption can be a little variable: mine has only used 3ish litres in 15000 miles.

Suspension is a perfect compromise for me: brilliant ride quality, sharp steering, great body control.

I don't know if the exhaust is the same on the 3.3 and 3.4, but its brilliant. Quiet for wafting, bellows at half throttle, screams at full throttle. The engine is a masterpiece. Head gasket is apparently a problem because of the wafer thin cylinder walls because of the extra bore.

When you try one, watch for a tiny transmission jolt at low revs as the box locks up - the torque converter could be on the way out, and its Alpina specific (i.e. expensive...)

graemel

Original Poster:

7,218 posts

243 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
Many thanks guys. Hopefully being a 2004 model it might sip a little less oil. Our old 3.3 used to drink a litre of oil every 250 to 300 miles which was rediculous. Good pointer on the smooth gearbox changes at low rpm. I'll take a mate of mine who spanners all our cars to have a thorough look at it when I go and see it. I'm sure there is a method of checking the water in the radiator to see if the head gasket is suspect. It's a three owner car with 82K on the clock. Need to take a good look at the service history and make sure it all stacks up I guess. Thanks once again, Graeme

Frances The Mute

1,816 posts

267 months

Sunday 25th November 2012
quotequote all
graemel said:
Our old 3.3 used to drink a litre of oil every 250 to 300 miles which was rediculous.
If you did a lot of short journeys, this isn't surprising. There could also have been an issue with the crankcase breather pipe - similar to that of the M62 based engines.

The previous owner of my B3 bemoaned the fact he was topping up a litre every 800 miles or so. He used the car to pootle into town and the local golf club so the engine was used for less than 10 minutes each time.

As soon as I started using it, consumption shifted to a litre every 4k or so.

iSore

4,011 posts

170 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
rumple said:
Regarding oil consumption it seems to be common with M54 engines, BMW say a litre per 1000 miles is within tolerences, i dont know if this applies to the alpina lump it would have been comprehensively upgraded.
No, it's not an M54 engine. These use the iron block unit and is derived from the USA market M52 engine (single Vanos) which its;ef is really the M50 emngiune from the old E34. It's a lovely motor. Head gaskets can go but it's not a big deal to replace.

rumple

14,246 posts

177 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
iSore said:
rumple said:
Regarding oil consumption it seems to be common with M54 engines, BMW say a litre per 1000 miles is within tolerences, i dont know if this applies to the alpina lump it would have been comprehensively upgraded.
No, it's not an M54 engine. These use the iron block unit and is derived from the USA market M52 engine (single Vanos) which its;ef is really the M50 emngiune from the old E34. It's a lovely motor. Head gaskets can go but it's not a big deal to replace.
Intresting, is it the same engine Alpina used in the E36.

graemel

Original Poster:

7,218 posts

243 months

Monday 26th November 2012
quotequote all
Frances The Mute said:
graemel said:
Our old 3.3 used to drink a litre of oil every 250 to 300 miles which was rediculous.
If you did a lot of short journeys, this isn't surprising. There could also have been an issue with the crankcase breather pipe - similar to that of the M62 based engines.

The previous owner of my B3 bemoaned the fact he was topping up a litre every 800 miles or so. He used the car to pootle into town and the local golf club so the engine was used for less than 10 minutes each time.

As soon as I started using it, consumption shifted to a litre every 4k or so.
If that was the case then I would not have minded so much. Kerry always used her Smart for shopping trips. No door dings. The Alpina only got used for the gym run either a 55 mile round trip or 100 mile round trip depending on which gym she went to. Don't ask but it does explain why her 3 and a half year old Smart has done 72,000 miles.

iSore

4,011 posts

170 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
rumple said:
Intresting, is it the same engine Alpina used in the E36.
Similar, but not quite the same.

tgr

1,238 posts

197 months

Tuesday 27th November 2012
quotequote all
I would search on the Alpina register. The 3.4S engine succumbs to head gasket failure about this mileage or soon after. The autobox is at the limit of torque that can be put through it and partly as a result can give problems - fluid/filter changes, TC recon/replacement, flywheel replacement and in extreme cases a GBP2k gearbox rebuild is called for.

Those are the main mechanical problems. On a lighter note bushes fail like any other E46, but given the power being put through the drivetrain the diff bushes may need looking at. The suspension is bespoke and costly to replace, some change for aftermarket dampers/springs