RE: Yamaha MT-07: Review
RE: Yamaha MT-07: Review
Monday 17th February 2014

Yamaha MT-07: Review

PH2 liked the MT-09 triple; might the baby MT-07 twin be even better?



After a few tough years, you get the feeling Yamaha has eventually woken up from a long sleep and is now starting to fight back. Having unveiled the excellent (if a little abrupt on the throttle) MT-09 last year, it has now followed it up with a smaller capacity sibling - the MT-07. And having spent a day thrashing it around a very windswept Lanzarote, PH2 has high hopes for this brilliant parallel twin and wouldn't be at all surprised to find it in the top five of the UK's best selling bikes this year. Did we mention it costs just £5,199?

Jon finds a solution to the hard to read clocks
Jon finds a solution to the hard to read clocks
Master Torque...
Yes, it's a fairly cheesy acronym, but the MT stands for Master Torque, something Yamaha has been busily trying to instill into its bikes through the 'cross-plane' philosophy. As the MT-07 (and MT-09) can't truly be called cross-plane due to the fact that their planes aren't crossed (only the in-line four is actually X-shaped when you look down the crank) the 689cc parallel twin does have an uneven firing order thanks to its 270-degree crank spacing, which is claimed to reduce torque fluctuations and is therefore 'cross-plane philosophy'.

Whatever the arguments, this is a brand new parallel twin engine, built to power a range of models and with 75hp and 50lb ft of torque, it knocks the spots off the likes of the Kawasaki ER-6n and Honda CB500 when it comes to performance. And the price.

At £5,199 you would have imagined the MT-07 to be a bit budget. Nothing could be further from the truth. Despite being just £200 more than the Honda CB500FA and £200 less than the (suddenly a bit cheaper - coincidence?) Kawasaki ER-6n the MT-07 appears far better built. Every component is bespoke (aside from wheels shared with the MT-09 and familiar looking monoblock brake calipers) and Yamaha claims that, like the MT-09, it has kept the prices down with cash-saving engineering techniques. So, with this in mind, the MT has no ride-by-wire, no traction control, no fuel models and optional ABS. And you know what, it's a million times better for it.

Budget price but looks the biz and goes well
Budget price but looks the biz and goes well
Get on and ride
When you fire up the MT-07 it is initially very disappointing. The exhaust note is, quite frankly, pathetic - a wet fart at best. I'd get onto Akrapovic and order a race pipe before I left my garage if I owned an MT, it really is that wimpy. But once you get going the exhaust is the last thing on your mind as the power delivery is amazing. The parallel twin is almost vibration free and ultra smooth. Once you open the throttle the bottom end is so strong the little bugger merrily hoists the front up in the air. And it'll do it in second if you try. And third with a bit of clutch. Hang on, isn't this a budget commuter?

That's the brilliant thing about the MT-07. Despite its cheap price tag, it delivers 100 per cent on fun. Don't think the engine is some wheelie happy animal, it isn't. If you want to just take it easy then the motor is more than happy to burble around with a slick gearbox, lovely throttle response and light clutch action, but should you wish to play the fool, it will happily oblige all day long. And the handling is equally accomplished.

We get the impression he rather likes it
We get the impression he rather likes it
With just 179kg to throw around, the MT-07 is remarkably light and agile. The low seat height makes this perfect for commuters or newer riders (it can be restricted to become A2-licence compliant) and it is far from intimidating at low speed. But it gets even better when the pace increases. While the suspension is a little budget (you only get spring preload adjustment on the shock to play with) the MT-09's wheels mean you are running proper sized rubber, allowing you to hoon around bends and push the Yamaha far further over than you would anticipate. Unlike the CB, which can tie itself up in knots when you get the hammer down, the MT-07 remains composed and seems to positively enjoy getting thrashed. Even the brakes are excellent, although we didn't test a bike with ABS fitted. After a full days riding the only thing I could criticise was the clocks. They may be nice and clear and come with a gear indicator and fuel gauge, but they seem set a little low on the bike, making it hard to check your speed with a quick glance. That said, mine (along with the front wheel) spent most of the day parallel with the horizon and in full view...

Chuckable, characterful and most of all fun!
Chuckable, characterful and most of all fun!
So much more than just a commuter...
The MT-07 really surprised me. Before riding it I though it would be a 'worthy' commuter that got on with the job in hand but failed to really throw up any thrills or excitement - how wrong I was. This parallel twin is nothing at all like the Honda CB500 range and instead is stacked full of fun and mischief as well as handling superbly and looking great. Although the engine is the real star of the show, I honestly can't find much to fault about the whole bike. I love the styling, the budget suspension is still very accomplished in its performance and even the brakes are top draw. I haven't enjoyed a day riding a bike as much as I did the MT-07 for a long time, in fact I think the last time I smiled as much was when I was on the MT-09. Although, where the triple did have a few rough edges (or as Yamaha call them, character traits) the parallel twin is quite simply brilliant.

Like Triumph did a few years back Yamaha has certainly turned a corner and instead of releasing Universal Japanese Motorcycles (UJMs) like the FZ8 or FZ1, they are now unleashing models that have a very definite reason to command ownership. They stand out from the crowd rather than blend into the background. Long may it continue.


YAMAHA MT-07
Engine:
689cc parallel twin
Power: 75hp@ 9,000rpm
Torque: 50lb ft@ 6,500rpm
Top speed: 130mph (est)
Weight: 179kg (wet)
MPG: 65mpg (est)
Price: £5,199 (£5,499 with ABS)


Some onboard with Jon from the launch event here.

 

'Rise up your darkness' (nor us) Manga-style promo vid here.

 

Author
Discussion

J B L

Original Poster:

4,217 posts

236 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
Cracking stuff from Yamaha at the right price too. Interesting, reliable, simple, affordable, exactly what motorcycling needs.

Can't wait to see what they'll do with the new R1. (although I'm sure the pricing won't be so keen)

sc0tt

18,224 posts

222 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
J B L said:
Cracking stuff from Yamaha at the right price too. Interesting, reliable, simple, affordable, exactly what motorcycling needs.

Can't wait to see what they'll do with the new R1. (although I'm sure the pricing won't be so keen)
200Bhp the mags seem to assume.

I'll be the first in line in 2015 (I hope)

PATTERNPART

693 posts

222 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
The MT09 was one of the best looking bikes at EXCEL on Saturday. In the real world category.

podman

9,004 posts

261 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
Looks a lot of (fun) bike for the money, going to have to blag myself a test ride on one of these...and the 09.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

276 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
Is the engine derived from the old TRX/TDM lump?

ssray

1,263 posts

246 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
new motor,

spareparts

6,796 posts

248 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
J B L said:
Cracking stuff from Yamaha at the right price too. Interesting, reliable, simple, affordable, exactly what motorcycling needs.
I must admit that I simply don't get these 'budget' bikes priced at 5k. If I had a 5k budget, I'd rather aim for a USED but better equipped, better finished 8-10k motor (when new). Every NEW 5k bike I've seen looks 5k - poorly finished, low end components, and they always feel built to a price. In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality, I just don't believe that people want poor quality finished items.

And based on what I've seen from Yamaha, they are falling behind the likes of Honda and BMW. Even the R1 looks like a cheap Airfix model in that battleship grey with stuck on switchgear. The MT09 and MT07 both look cheap. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the STRiple (mainly because of the noise it makes), but I do think Triumph set the standard at the bottom end of the market with that bike and it remains the definitive 5k naked to beat.

Salgar

3,285 posts

205 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
spareparts said:
J B L said:
Cracking stuff from Yamaha at the right price too. Interesting, reliable, simple, affordable, exactly what motorcycling needs.
I must admit that I simply don't get these 'budget' bikes priced at 5k. If I had a 5k budget, I'd rather aim for a USED but better equipped, better finished 8-10k motor (when new). Every NEW 5k bike I've seen looks 5k - poorly finished, low end components, and they always feel built to a price. In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality, I just don't believe that people want poor quality finished items.

And based on what I've seen from Yamaha, they are falling behind the likes of Honda and BMW. Even the R1 looks like a cheap Airfix model in that battleship grey with stuck on switchgear. The MT09 and MT07 both look cheap. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the STRiple (mainly because of the noise it makes), but I do think Triumph set the standard at the bottom end of the market with that bike and it remains the definitive 5k naked to beat.
But the noise?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5zxpjXA4_8&lis...

spareparts

6,796 posts

248 months

Monday 17th February 2014
quotequote all
Salgar said:
spareparts said:
J B L said:
Cracking stuff from Yamaha at the right price too. Interesting, reliable, simple, affordable, exactly what motorcycling needs.
I must admit that I simply don't get these 'budget' bikes priced at 5k. If I had a 5k budget, I'd rather aim for a USED but better equipped, better finished 8-10k motor (when new). Every NEW 5k bike I've seen looks 5k - poorly finished, low end components, and they always feel built to a price. In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality, I just don't believe that people want poor quality finished items.

And based on what I've seen from Yamaha, they are falling behind the likes of Honda and BMW. Even the R1 looks like a cheap Airfix model in that battleship grey with stuck on switchgear. The MT09 and MT07 both look cheap. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the STRiple (mainly because of the noise it makes), but I do think Triumph set the standard at the bottom end of the market with that bike and it remains the definitive 5k naked to beat.
But the noise?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5zxpjXA4_8&lis...
A 3-1 Low Boy is cheating biggrin

But I still find the overtly loud cam whine annoying tongue out

RizzoTheRat

27,740 posts

213 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Is the engine derived from the old TRX/TDM lump?
Same layout but completely new. It'd be nice to think they might produce a new sports bike and tourer in the TRX and TDM mould using this engine, but I'm not holding my breath, they seem to be obsessed with nakeds these days.

J B L

Original Poster:

4,217 posts

236 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
spareparts said:
I must admit that I simply don't get these 'budget' bikes priced at 5k. If I had a 5k budget, I'd rather aim for a USED but better equipped, better finished 8-10k motor (when new). Every NEW 5k bike I've seen looks 5k - poorly finished, low end components, and they always feel built to a price. In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality, I just don't believe that people want poor quality finished items.

And based on what I've seen from Yamaha, they are falling behind the likes of Honda and BMW. Even the R1 looks like a cheap Airfix model in that battleship grey with stuck on switchgear. The MT09 and MT07 both look cheap. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the STRiple (mainly because of the noise it makes), but I do think Triumph set the standard at the bottom end of the market with that bike and it remains the definitive 5k naked to beat.
You're right but I also think that a slight plastic finish is a fairly Japanese thing to have. I mean even their cars feel like that when priced similar to their 'better first impression' European competitors.

I think the point of these machines is how much they are going to be customised by their owners. In many markets where the nakeds are king, you'd be hard pressed to find a bike with unmodified seat, exhaust, handlebars, mirrors, headlight etc... You know, you've made the French / Spanish / Italian trips.

In fact, I think Yamaha themselves are selling a silly looking kit for the MT09, no doubt more to come on the MT07. The price is just to get the punter through the dealer's door.

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

260 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
spareparts said:
In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality,
Really? I've never viewed Apple's products other than glossy mass produced 'stack 'em high, sell 'em expensive' things for the general masses. Form before function.

spareparts

6,796 posts

248 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
J B L said:
spareparts said:
I must admit that I simply don't get these 'budget' bikes priced at 5k. If I had a 5k budget, I'd rather aim for a USED but better equipped, better finished 8-10k motor (when new). Every NEW 5k bike I've seen looks 5k - poorly finished, low end components, and they always feel built to a price. In the day of iPhones and other Apple-like toys that exude quality, I just don't believe that people want poor quality finished items.

And based on what I've seen from Yamaha, they are falling behind the likes of Honda and BMW. Even the R1 looks like a cheap Airfix model in that battleship grey with stuck on switchgear. The MT09 and MT07 both look cheap. TBH, I'm not a huge fan of the STRiple (mainly because of the noise it makes), but I do think Triumph set the standard at the bottom end of the market with that bike and it remains the definitive 5k naked to beat.
You're right but I also think that a slight plastic finish is a fairly Japanese thing to have. I mean even their cars feel like that when priced similar to their 'better first impression' European competitors.

I think the point of these machines is how much they are going to be customised by their owners. In many markets where the nakeds are king, you'd be hard pressed to find a bike with unmodified seat, exhaust, handlebars, mirrors, headlight etc... You know, you've made the French / Spanish / Italian trips.

In fact, I think Yamaha themselves are selling a silly looking kit for the MT09, no doubt more to come on the MT07. The price is just to get the punter through the dealer's door.
On further thought, I think Honda got it right with the likes of the NC700. Build quality is good, design well thought out, great commuters for both experienced and new riders, and they are unbelievably frugal hitting 80mpg for a 700cc twin! Is it an exciting hooligan bike? No. But somehow I think they are a bike that has appeal at the 5k (new) range. Sales have been huge for the NC700 range too, further supporting the demand for *well made* budget nakeds.

On the continent, no doubt that there will be ongoing demand for Hornets etc that can be customised no end. But at least the starting base with a Hornet is well made. Yamaha's offerings just feel to miss the mark from an ownership perspective, even though they would be a fun rental. Just my $0.02.

J B L

Original Poster:

4,217 posts

236 months

Tuesday 18th February 2014
quotequote all
spareparts said:
On further thought, I think Honda got it right with the likes of the NC700. Build quality is good, design well thought out, great commuters for both experienced and new riders, and they are unbelievably frugal hitting 80mpg for a 700cc twin! Is it an exciting hooligan bike? No. But somehow I think they are a bike that has appeal at the 5k (new) range. Sales have been huge for the NC700 range too, further supporting the demand for *well made* budget nakeds.

On the continent, no doubt that there will be ongoing demand for Hornets etc that can be customised no end. But at least the starting base with a Hornet is well made. Yamaha's offerings just feel to miss the mark from an ownership perspective, even though they would be a fun rental. Just my $0.02.
Look. I know what you're doing. Yamahas are awesome.

Stop dissing them.

Yours.

Me. wink





Volition

227 posts

157 months

Friday 21st February 2014
quotequote all
I was very tempted by this as my first (and only big bike), as well as the MT09, but then I wanted something with more power that would last longer with upgradable suspension and better brakes, so I spent the extra money and bought a Street Triple R. I have no plans to change the bike as it's for leisure only, so it should be with me a long time. The Triumph is heaps better than the MT09 in terms of build quality. The dash on the MT09 is so 'budget' and I just preferred the Triumph all round.