Gearing on the fastest superbikes?
Gearing on the fastest superbikes?
Author
Discussion

Grindle

Original Poster:

764 posts

114 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Several 1,000cc sports bikes will now do 90 mph in first gear, indeed, apparently one of them, i forget which, recently did 96 mph at the rev limiter in cog number 1. (ZX10RR?)
Why do they fit these bikes with such a high first gear? No mass-produced car maker does it, after all. Is it to keep the wheel somewhere near the ground, now that the bikes are so powerful? Is it that they have one eye on the various race competitions involving the bikes and then they are far better suited to a track with 6 close gears? Also why is there no 8 speed sports bike yet? My son has a new-version RHD Mustang and it has ten gears as standard.
The bikes seem to handle the tall first gear well, in fairness, whereas my old Honda 750 (RC30) was a pig in town due to the 75 mph first gear, heavy clutch and lack of low down power.

PTF

4,456 posts

254 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Because they are track based machines, where very little time is spent at road speeds. First gear gets you up to where the bike is supposed to spend most of its time (on track at least), then the other 5 gears are closely stacked.

Makes riding a litre bike in 20-30 mph city traffic needing some clutch slip.

Also means using more than 2/3 of the revs in any gear is illegal on the road.

Having said all that, i miss my 2014 blade terribly because it was just so over-the-top biggrin

PTF

4,456 posts

254 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
I've ridden my year 2000 R1 quite a bit this year and the difference between it and more modern litre bikes was quite marked. You can actually use the power waaaay more because the gearing isn't quite as silly long

SAS Tom

3,755 posts

204 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
To be honest I find most bikes geared too long. I’ve shortened the gearing on most of my bikes as I don’t find myself doing over 150mph often if ever.

black-k1

12,807 posts

259 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
SAS Tom said:
To be honest I find most bikes geared too long. I’ve shortened the gearing on most of my bikes as I don’t find myself doing over 150mph often if ever.
Interestingly, I find most bikes geared too short. They have so much grunt and rev so quickly that I struggle to use full throttle in first before the bike revs out. Even in top, there’s so much torque that they accelerate pretty damn quickly. I’d rather lower the revs for a given speed (by increasing the gearing) to make things more relaxed in top and accept I may need to use the gears a little more.

Jazoli

9,681 posts

280 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
My 5VY R1 did 104mph in first on the standard gearing allegedly, my Z1000SX is undergeared but I can't change the sprockets as the IMU throws a hissy fit.

moanthebairns

19,176 posts

228 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
1st gear scares me.....

Dog Star

17,633 posts

198 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
PTF said:
I've ridden my year 2000 R1 quite a bit this year and the difference between it and more modern litre bikes was quite marked. You can actually use the power waaaay more because the gearing isn't quite as silly long
Yep - I've a 4XV 1999 and a 2017 - the old bike is so much more sensibly set up for road use. Progress, eh?

Grindle

Original Poster:

764 posts

114 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
The first thing i did with my 1299 Ducati and the 999S i had a while before that was lower the gearing. The bikes felt livelier, i could use more gears more of the time and top gear roll-ons were faster, 5th gear was almost never needed on the open road.
I know of a B King for sale with 225 bhp, modified heavily with 1441cc and all sorts of other stuff from Holeshot Racing. The owner has fitted smaller front and larger rear sprockets to lower the gearing over 15%. I bet that's lively in 1st and 2nd!

CoolHands

23,635 posts

225 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Lowering the gearing seems ridiculous to me, my gsxr1000 was crazy fast anyway, and you could hardly use full throttle in first 4 gears anyway. To make it accelerate even more quickly would be pointless.

mak

1,445 posts

256 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
moanthebairns said:
1st gear scares me.....
^^^^^^^ I get out of 1st as soon as possible, I have no desire whatsoever to wind a bike up in 1st or 2nd on WOT, give me 3rd onwards, 6th is a bit of Russian roulette as your going down if you get your picture taken.

Honestly the most affective rider aid for me over the last few years is anti wheelie on a modern litre plus bike if you trust it smile

moto_traxport

4,264 posts

251 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
Grindle said:
Also why is there no 8 speed sports bike yet? My son has a new-version RHD Mustang and it has ten gears as standard.
I think bike racing rules dictate a maximum of 6 gears. Also the high gearing on production bikes is often to sidestep noise emissions as one of the homologation test is full throttle in 2nd gear at a certain speed not from a specific rpm.

All this 8, 9 & 10 (!) speed boxes in the latest cars is about emissions and doing everything possible to keep the engine at 1600rpm.

Careful what you wish for - one of the things that spoil modern cars is these horrible gearboxes.

Wasn’t aware that changing sprocket sizes wasn’t possible on some recent bikes due to be detected by the IMU. Err, no thanks!!

Steve Bass

10,755 posts

263 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
moto_traxport said:
Grindle said:
Also why is there no 8 speed sports bike yet? My son has a new-version RHD Mustang and it has ten gears as standard.
I think bike racing rules dictate a maximum of 6 gears. Also the high gearing on production bikes is often to sidestep noise emissions as one of the homologation test is full throttle in 2nd gear at a certain speed not from a specific rpm.

All this 8, 9 & 10 (!) speed boxes in the latest cars is about emissions and doing everything possible to keep the engine at 1600rpm.

Careful what you wish for - one of the things that spoil modern cars is these horrible gearboxes.

Wasn’t aware that changing sprocket sizes wasn’t possible on some recent bikes due to be detected by the IMU. Err, no thanks!!
And as the gears are laid out transversly additional gears will increase the width of the engine casings and affects the output shaft sprocket location.
And with the rpm range bike engines have, additional gears would be worthless.
Back in the day however before racing dictated the maximum gears, 50cc racers weren't unknown to have 17 or more gears to enable the engine to operate in an incredibly narrow power band.

gareth_r

6,773 posts

267 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Steve Bass said:
...Back in the day however before racing dictated the maximum gears, 50cc racers weren't unknown to have 17 or more gears to enable the engine to operate in an incredibly narrow power band.
Suzuki RK67

50cc disc valve 2-stroke twin
17.5bhp @17,250 rpm (350bhp/litre)
109mph
14 speed gearbox


Sidecar Man

802 posts

91 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
moto_traxport said:
Grindle said:
Also why is there no 8 speed sports bike yet? My son has a new-version RHD Mustang and it has ten gears as standard.
I think bike racing rules dictate a maximum of 6 gears. Also the high gearing on production bikes is often to sidestep noise emissions as one of the homologation test is full throttle in 2nd gear at a certain speed not from a specific rpm.

All this 8, 9 & 10 (!) speed boxes in the latest cars is about emissions and doing everything possible to keep the engine at 1600rpm.

Careful what you wish for - one of the things that spoil modern cars is these horrible gearboxes.

Wasn’t aware that changing sprocket sizes wasn’t possible on some recent bikes due to be detected by the IMU. Err, no thanks!!
We are going to be using 7 speed box at TT next year

Dog Star

17,633 posts

198 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
gareth_r said:
Steve Bass said:
...Back in the day however before racing dictated the maximum gears, 50cc racers weren't unknown to have 17 or more gears to enable the engine to operate in an incredibly narrow power band.
Suzuki RK67

50cc disc valve 2-stroke twin
17.5bhp @17,250 rpm (350bhp/litre)
109mph
14 speed gearbox

Those tiny pistons!

Grindle

Original Poster:

764 posts

114 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
There was a 49.9cc 3 cylinder, HOW small would those pistons have been? Thimbles?

gareth_r

6,773 posts

267 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Grindle said:
There was a 49.9cc 3 cylinder, HOW small would those pistons have been? Thimbles?
The RP68. Never raced because the FIM changed the rules for 1968.


HughiusMaximus

737 posts

156 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Out of curiosity when you guys change the gearing do you do something to adjust the speedo too or just do some mental arithmetic to correct?

black-k1

12,807 posts

259 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
HughiusMaximus said:
Out of curiosity when you guys change the gearing do you do something to adjust the speedo too or just do some mental arithmetic to correct?
Most speedos are "optimistic" anyway so increasing the gearing often makes them more accurate (as measured against a sat. nav.

Newer bikes with ABS will often take the speedo feed from the ABS wheel sensors so a change of gearing has no impact.