High mileage sports bike
High mileage sports bike
Author
Discussion

mat205125

Original Poster:

17,790 posts

234 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
First post on this section of the forum, and risking a REPOST flaming.

What, these days, is considered a high mileage sports bike - thinking GSXR750 4-pot or SP1 Honda twin.

What parts are quickest to get tired and require replacing, and how long can a well maintained engine last before it turns into a smoking, rattling pile of poo.

Your answers are much appreciated.

runnersp

1,061 posts

241 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
A well maintaned engine will last practically forever! First bits to go on a bike tend to be the standard shock, rubber brake lines, bearings and the like... I've got a 125thousand km BMW K100 that still runs like a good 'un...

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

262 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
Any Jap bike will be up for a high mileage. However, if you actually want to do a high mileage then 600s are cheaper to run and insure. They are easier on tyres, chains etc.

An SP1 is rather thirsty.

Fire99

9,863 posts

250 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
I cant comment on either specifically but depending on model i would think, depending on how its been ridden, a GSXR750 may be a fairly good bet up to 50k ish.

The SP1 on the other hand i personally would be a little wary of. 2 Huge pistons and bags of instant torque put alot of strain on the bottom end etc and i'd be a bit concerned on anything over 35k ish.

Purely a personal view.

rgds,

Nick

podman

9,005 posts

261 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
The engines last for yonks, it’s the chassis that is more delicate and requires more frequent maintaince..Bearings, linkages, suspension all require an overhaul and that’s both expensive and time consuming.

My mates GSXR Thou had done 45K , he asked his local tuner to take it apart “because it must need a refresh”…they reluctantly put a set of rings in it…no measurable wear whatsoever…however, he was rebuilding the chassis for a much longer period of time and that is more fiddly

mat205125

Original Poster:

17,790 posts

234 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
As a rule of thumb then, will a similar capacity 4 last longer than a twin as the internal stresses are lower?

When checking out a 2nd hand 10k mile GSXR750, is the engine a pretty reliable item, and suspension and such more important / prone to wear?

Biker's Nemesis

40,927 posts

229 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
As a rule of thumb then, will a similar capacity 4 last longer than a twin as the internal stresses are lower?

When checking out a 2nd hand 10k mile GSXR750, is the engine a pretty reliable item, and suspension and such more important / prone to wear?
Too many variables, some owners will have the bodywork spotless but may have thrashed it from cold, missed services etc etc, while a bike with a few stone chips or scuffs could have been looked after very well.

Ten Thousand miles on a modern Japanese superbike is no big shakes nowadays, I would not like to comment on anything with twin cylinders from outside Japan.

anonymous-user

75 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Ten Thousand miles on a modern Japanese superbike is no big shakes nowadays, I would not like to comment on anything with twin cylinders from outside Japan.
I've heard of plenty of Rsv's going past 20k without problem.

bimsb6

8,554 posts

242 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
an early cbr6 i looked after for a friend had 75k miles on it when it was retired for no other reason than the forks were completely worn out and will be kept for spares . all it ever needed were discs
and a couple of cam chains and other normal wear and tear items .

m3psm

988 posts

242 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
I put 100k miles on my old GSX550 (four cylinder) when I was a courier with no engine problems at all. The next two owners who I knew put a further 20k on it and it was stil running like a dream.

I've seen courier CX500s and BM's (twin cylinder) with over 200k on them eek

m3psm

988 posts

242 months

Monday 16th July 2007
quotequote all
Oops. Double post rolleyes

Edited by m3psm on Monday 16th July 21:32

dern

14,055 posts

300 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
I took the head of my 2000 blade's engine last year with 28k on it and you could still see the honing marks on the cylinder bores. I only took it apart to get a spark plug thread redone when it spat the plug. The engine is a bit rattly but these engine are notorious for it according to the blade forum. Usual suspects are the htev valve in the exhaust rattling and the camchain tensioner can go a bit weak. None of these things are that important but the bike does gradually with miles go from a black box that can just be fed and run to something that may need to odd part. The chassis needs more attention. I'm now coming up to 30k miles (still, I haven't done many miles of late) and I've replaced the head race bearings, rear wheel bearings and have had the swing arm off while I took the engine out and greased up the link. The bike looks very cosmetically challenged but would probably clean up ok and could look quite nice apart from the off fastener succumbing to corrosion. However, a lot of this is down to the fact that I've used it over a couple of winters and rarely (i.e. annually) clean it. I do all my own servicing and maint work and have done since 8k miles.

Mark

runnersp

1,061 posts

241 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
mat205125 said:
As a rule of thumb then, will a similar capacity 4 last longer than a twin as the internal stresses are lower?

When checking out a 2nd hand 10k mile GSXR750, is the engine a pretty reliable item, and suspension and such more important / prone to wear?
Too many variables, some owners will have the bodywork spotless but may have thrashed it from cold, missed services etc etc, while a bike with a few stone chips or scuffs could have been looked after very well.

Ten Thousand miles on a modern Japanese superbike is no big shakes nowadays, I would not like to comment on anything with twin cylinders from outside Japan.
The 237000km Moto Guzzi owned by a close friend of mine begs to differ...

black-k1

12,632 posts

250 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Ten Thousand miles on a modern Japanese superbike is no big shakes nowadays, I would not like to comment on anything with twin cylinders from outside Japan.
I would expect just about every two cylinder BMW from the last 35 years to do at least 5 times that before anything other than consumables needed doing engine wise. With the oil cooled engines of the last 17 years easily achieving over 100k miles before any real risk of something substantial needing doing.

Andy OH

1,959 posts

271 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
Mat, I've got a 2005 R1 that has done 33,000 miles and going strong.....I maintain it regularly and change the oil every 5,000 miles...yes it is showing it's mileage in places, mainly the plastics but there is nothing wrong with it and I intend doing many more miles on it.

TvrJohn

1,067 posts

276 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
I run a Honda VFR750, just coming up to 60,000 miles, about 12k a year daily user
No probs just change oil n filter every year, and usual consumables, tyres chains
Brill

podman

9,005 posts

261 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
runnersp said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
mat205125 said:
As a rule of thumb then, will a similar capacity 4 last longer than a twin as the internal stresses are lower?

When checking out a 2nd hand 10k mile GSXR750, is the engine a pretty reliable item, and suspension and such more important / prone to wear?
Too many variables, some owners will have the bodywork spotless but may have thrashed it from cold, missed services etc etc, while a bike with a few stone chips or scuffs could have been looked after very well.

Ten Thousand miles on a modern Japanese superbike is no big shakes nowadays, I would not like to comment on anything with twin cylinders from outside Japan.
The 237000km Moto Guzzi owned by a close friend of mine begs to differ...
I would well imagine and expect a low stressed,low revving Guzzi lump to run for years, however,flame suit ready, despite some *other *italian twins with good mileage on them, ive not known any of my friends/acquaintances with Ducatis who havent had problems with the engine and/or electrics...Which is fine if you know what you have bought into and expect the odd bill now and again but no matter how staunch a supporter you are of them you have to admit italian bikes do have a reputation for unreliabilty with good reason.

anonymous-user

75 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
podman said:
you have to admit italian bikes do have a reputation for unreliabilty with good reason.
That's all in the past imo, but like the saying go's "when you're good they never remember, when you're bad they never forget" and that's still a problem for Italian cars and bikes imo... Alfa are making fantastic cars now, that are equally as reliable as any other manufacture, but people still remember the bad days and no matter how good the product is now, it's hard to make them forget.

runnersp

1,061 posts

241 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
All the Italian bikes I've had had been perfectly reliable. If they're treated right and serviced religiously I don't see why they shoudln't be. A work colleague has a 75000km Monster 750 and aside from usual consumables (including several cambelts) so far the speedo cable has broken and the wire to the rear left indicator broke a couple of weeks ago. He wanted to buy a new bike but has decided to see just how far the Monster will go...

podman

9,005 posts

261 months

Tuesday 17th July 2007
quotequote all
JS99 said:
podman said:
you have to admit italian bikes do have a reputation for unreliabilty with good reason.
That's all in the past imo, but like the saying go's "when you're good they never remember, when you're bad they never forget" and that's still a problem for Italian cars and bikes imo... Alfa are making fantastic cars now, that are equally as reliable as any other manufacture, but people still remember the bad days and no matter how good the product is now, it's hard to make them forget.
All in the past IMO...that doesnt tally up with whats ACTUALLY happened to my friends 748's/996's..I believe the new 1098 has a recall on it at the moment..time will tell i guess..i do agree with you on the Alfa comment thou