power or torque ?
Author
Discussion

Craphouserat

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Still bored - maybe reading or trying to read to much. Can someone explain in idiots terms what torque is..is it a good thing or bad thing? It has a lot to do with power right?

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
eek
Similar pages have run to hundreds of posts, sometimes thousands!

To be honest, big torque numbers is less relevant with bikes.
In fact, although there are many shades of opinion on this, torque output matters less as the weight of a vehicle drops.
It's handy with big cars, essential with lorries.

So, for a bike, it's not really an issue, unless you weigh 20 stones plus!

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Power = torque times revs divided by 5250!



http://ask.cars.com/2007/04/what_is_torque.html

Edited by Beemer-5 on Wednesday 30th January 11:59

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

262 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
power is how fast you hit the stone wall on that decreasing radius right hander.
torque is how far into the field you go afterwards.

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
That's the old cliche, aye!

Craphouserat

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Ok - think I'll give up on this one..just keep reading in bike mags how torquey some bikes are..tried wikipedia..like a bloddy physics lesson and i only went to them at school cos i fancied the teacher.

Thanks anyway guys.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

262 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
CHR, easiest way of explaining it is with a bike with big torque, you can be a lazy git, and not change gear quite as much as you need to on one with big power, and less torque. Sort of the difference between a 600 and a thousand, only different, if you see what I mean.

Personal experience moving from a twin to an IL4, was that the twin would get you to illegal speeds so smoothly you didnt notice it, where the IL4 needed bigger revs to get there, so you hear it more.

RemaL

25,103 posts

265 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
I always enjoy learnign stuff like this, main reason I went for the new triple. plenty of power and torque for me.

dern

14,055 posts

310 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
If you're bored and have nothing to do... http://craig.backfire.ca/pages/autos/horsepower

Conian

8,030 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
If you want to be a racer, screaming it through all the gears, making sure youre in the right gear all the time.... you want power.

If you want to overtake easily and ride nice n relaxed, torque is what ya need.

Of course, it's not as simple as HOW much torque you have... it's about where does the engine make the torgue in relation to RPM, how long does the torque last as you accelerate etc

JackHolroyde

490 posts

229 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Power is how fast the back wheel goes
Torque is the force at which the back wheel turns. Its the force of turning.

An engine puts out a certain torque at x amount of bhp.

100bhp @ 12500rpm.
78.6ft-lb of torque
This is high revving bike - you have to get to 12500 revs to make maximum use of the torque

A Harley might put out 78.6bhp of Torque at 5000 rpm. This makes the turning force easier to get to, meaning the bike has more grunt, but less top end insanity...

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

272 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Imagine torque as the size of the shove you get when you accelerate.

Now imagine Power is more like the number of these shoves you get per minute.

So a small capacity 600cc sportsbike would have a small torque figure like 40ft-lb. It will never give a huge lunge forward but it will keep giving you that smaller push (more or less) for a wide rev range; probably 7-8,000rpm. So it will be fast.

On a torquey, primitive engine like a Harley, you'll get a much larger lunge forward from the torque but probably only over about a rev range of 3000rpm. You'll need to keep changing up sharpish to stop the engine overrevving or becoming breathless. This type of torque delivery better suits a short-shift style of riding.

On a V-twin you'll get more torque at lower revs due to the larger piston size. The weight of the pistons (and the forces on the conrods etc accelerating this mass) limits the speed they can operate, thus limiting the revs available (as does the breathing of these larger pistons).

JackHolroyde

490 posts

229 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
rsv gone! said:
Imagine torque as the size of the shove you get when you accelerate.

Now imagine Power is more like the number of these shoves you get per minute.

So a small capacity 600cc sportsbike would have a small torque figure like 40ft-lb. It will never give a huge lunge forward but it will keep giving you that smaller push (more or less) for a wide rev range; probably 7-8,000rpm. So it will be fast.

On a torquey, primitive engine like a Harley, you'll get a much larger lunge forward from the torque but probably only over about a rev range of 3000rpm. You'll need to keep changing up sharpish to stop the engine overrevving or becoming breathless. This type of torque delivery better suits a short-shift style of riding.

On a V-twin you'll get more torque at lower revs due to the larger piston size. The weight of the pistons (and the forces on the conrods etc accelerating this mass) limits the speed they can operate, thus limiting the revs available (as does the breathing of these larger pistons).
clap

Carl-H

947 posts

237 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
If you think of a high revving two stroke, this will have hardly and torque but quite alot of power compared to a big single or twin which doesn't have such a mad rush at the top end and lots more low down. Like the difference between petrol and diesel cars.

Beemer-5

7,897 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
One bike engine gives you the lot.

186 bhp.
101 lbs-ft.

biggrin

Craphouserat

Original Poster:

1,542 posts

232 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Thank you all - that is better explained that anything I've read - especially in wikipedia - thanks RSV and thanks to the links guys...all helpfull when I'm reading my mags.

Thanks again

Barry.

slim_boy_fat

735 posts

270 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Torque is how hard you can punch

Power is how fast you can punch.

Engine produce torque (its a rotational force). The more an engine can rev then the more power it will produce.

A high torque engine with low revs (big cc's harley) can produce the same power as a low torque engine with high revs (600cc middleweight) One punches hard but slow the other punches soft but fast. The same result, you get a sore face wink

p.s. torque is usually measured in Nm or lbft and power in kW or bhp.



robstvr

3,217 posts

299 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
I just think of it as lots of torque being the ability of an engine to pull from any given point on the rev range. As an example, "low down torque" means that from low revs the bike will pull away no probs.

Oh, i don't know.

It's also a brass thing you wear on your upper arm.

black-k1

12,807 posts

260 months

Wednesday 30th January 2008
quotequote all
Craphouserat said:
Still bored - maybe reading or trying to read to much. Can someone explain in idiots terms what torque is..is it a good thing or bad thing? It has a lot to do with power right?
Previous discussion on the subject here http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0...

Silver993tt

9,064 posts

270 months

Thursday 31st January 2008
quotequote all
Beemer-5 said:
One bike engine gives you the lot.

186 bhp.
101 lbs-ft.

biggrin
Not my in bike, it gives:

194bhp
113 lbs-ft

biggrin