6TH Gear Problem
Author
Discussion

wingnut.

Original Poster:

133 posts

218 months

Tuesday 24th March 2009
quotequote all
I was on the home tonight sat on the motorway in 6th @ 70mph(honest?) and had to twist the throttle to the stop in order to stop the usual blind car driver from putting me in the barrier, the bike felt like it was running out of juice for a second or so the picked up as usual.

After showing the driver the error of his ways via hand signals I tried it again and the same happened? It doesn't do it in any other gear apart from 6th?

Its a 1998 ZX6R please help! confused

lenientism

223 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
It's very likely gear ratio problem. For daily use bikes optimum acceleration can be reached up to the 4th gear, the higher gears are relatively to smooth the engine and increase fuel economy, while practically without significant acceleration.
Ask mechanic to modify the gear ratio than standard when bike manufactured to gain more acceleration of high gears.

Carl-H

947 posts

236 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
I know what you mean. Its not that theres no acceleration but as you open the throttle it bogs down? My bike does the same unless the revs are high. Not sure what it is but I would like to find out too.

littleredrooster

6,412 posts

226 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
It's a 'characteristic' of highly-tuned small engines. They need to be revved hard to produce any meaningful power. If you want an engine which will pull hard from 70 in 6th gear, you probably need a twin rather than a four.
An improvement can be made by putting a one-tooth smaller sprocket on the gearbox. This will have the effect of making the bike rev harder for any given road speed and improve pickup. It will, however, reduce your top speed as the engine will run out of revs earlier.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
try it at the same revs in 5th, if its just the engine bogging down you'll get it almost as bad.
its one of the things i dont enjoy on sports bikes, i prefer a lazier tuned engine that just pulls at any revs.

y2blade

56,321 posts

245 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
littleredrooster said:
It's a 'characteristic' of highly-tuned small engines. They need to be revved hard to produce any meaningful power. If you want an engine which will pull hard from 70 in 6th gear, you probably need a twin rather than a four.
An improvement can be made by putting a one-tooth smaller sprocket on the gearbox. This will have the effect of making the bike rev harder for any given road speed and improve pickup. It will, however, reduce your top speed as the engine will run out of revs earlier.
what he said^^^


PolarExpress

6,796 posts

257 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Dropping a tooth on the front sometimes doesn't lose you vmax - you can jsut get there quicker. IINM, a lot of newer bikes have 6th as an overdrive for fuel economy, and vmax can be reached in 5th on the standard sprockets.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
lenientism said:
It's very likely gear ratio problem. For daily use bikes optimum acceleration can be reached up to the 4th gear, the higher gears are relatively to smooth the engine and increase fuel economy, while practically without significant acceleration.
Ask mechanic to modify the gear ratio than standard when bike manufactured to gain more acceleration of high gears.
Are you posting through babelfish?!

black-k1

12,807 posts

259 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
PolarExpress said:
Dropping a tooth on the front sometimes doesn't lose you vmax - you can jsut get there quicker. IINM, a lot of newer bikes have 6th as an overdrive for fuel economy, and vmax can be reached in 5th on the standard sprockets.
Fuel economy would be the thing to consider if changing the gearing on the bike. A one tooth reduction in the front sprocket would likely have about a 5% to 8% reduction in gearing and may also have about a 5% reduction in fuel economy. Your speedo will also over read by an additional 5 % to 8% which will make it look as though you are going faster than you actually are.

A simpler solution is simply to drop to 5th when you want to accelerate away!

untruth

2,834 posts

219 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Look online for a torque/power curve for your bike. You can then see at what revs you should be expecting the power and not expecting it.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
Fuel economy would be the thing to consider if changing the gearing on the bike. A one tooth reduction in the front sprocket would likely have about a 5% to 8% reduction in gearing and may also have about a 5% reduction in fuel economy. Your speedo will also over read by an additional 5 % to 8% which will make it look as though you are going faster than you actually are.
i went up a tooth at the front on my old RF600, it gained me 5mpg. i'd expect a similar loss by going down at the front.
as to the speedo, depends on the bike. if it reads off the gearbox then yes it'll be out. if its the older style with a cable to the front wheel it wont be affected.

MaximumJed

745 posts

262 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
I take it I am one of the only people who read the OP as the bike hesitating when he wound the throttle open, not just a not enough acceleration thing? My old 540 used to do the same if you suddenly depressed the throttle, almost like it was drawing breath.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
MaximumJed said:
I take it I am one of the only people who read the OP as the bike hesitating when he wound the throttle open, not just a not enough acceleration thing? My old 540 used to do the same if you suddenly depressed the throttle, almost like it was drawing breath.
low revs & high throttle = low airspeed in the intake tract, that can cause hesitation due to the fuel not atomising properly. could even be the accelerator pump (if its got them) pumping too much & basicly flooding it.

C8PPO

20,881 posts

233 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
MaximumJed said:
I take it I am one of the only people who read the OP as the bike hesitating when he wound the throttle open, not just a not enough acceleration thing? My old 540 used to do the same if you suddenly depressed the throttle, almost like it was drawing breath.
My old Thunderace was prone to this. Exactly the same symptoms. Carb icing?

MaximumJed

745 posts

262 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Hooli said:
MaximumJed said:
I take it I am one of the only people who read the OP as the bike hesitating when he wound the throttle open, not just a not enough acceleration thing? My old 540 used to do the same if you suddenly depressed the throttle, almost like it was drawing breath.
low revs & high throttle = low airspeed in the intake tract, that can cause hesitation due to the fuel not atomising properly. could even be the accelerator pump (if its got them) pumping too much & basicly flooding it.
That's the sort of thing I was thinking of, I also just found this, which has a similar conclusion:

Review of the 2000 ZX6R said:
The engine responds very crisply to throttle input and the four 36mm Mikuni carburettors are almost too sensitive to the quarter-turn throttle. In top gear there's a slight hesitation at around 8,000 rpm, which corresponds to just under 160km/h - the Kawa takes a few nervous seconds to pull through it, but at ten it comes back on song and lights up like a skyrocket, all the way to the redline at 14000. I can't prove it, but I think the carburetion is momentarily rich until the Ram Air effect comes into play, pushing a whole lot of extra air into the equation.
so it might be a characteristic of the bike?

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
ahh ram air induction?
yup sounds like its what the bike does then. they'll have tuned it rich so that when the ramair increases the amount of air forced in the mixture is correct.

PolarExpress

6,796 posts

257 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
black-k1 said:
PolarExpress said:
Dropping a tooth on the front sometimes doesn't lose you vmax - you can jsut get there quicker. IINM, a lot of newer bikes have 6th as an overdrive for fuel economy, and vmax can be reached in 5th on the standard sprockets.
Fuel economy would be the thing to consider if changing the gearing on the bike. A one tooth reduction in the front sprocket would likely have about a 5% to 8% reduction in gearing and may also have about a 5% reduction in fuel economy. Your speedo will also over read by an additional 5 % to 8% which will make it look as though you are going faster than you actually are.

A simpler solution is simply to drop to 5th when you want to accelerate away!
Indeed, but I think it also depends on the style of riding (and the bike). On my old bike, I found that dropping a tooth on the front actually improved my mpg in day-to-day riding: the slight increase in revs(in particular at slower road speeds) meant the engine gave an increase in torque for the same road speed that allowed better in-gear acceleration with less right hand twist/fueling.

Speedohealer cured the speedo over read.

wingnut.

Original Poster:

133 posts

218 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Thanks guys, it does sound more of a trait rather than a problem, I've just remembered its 2 teeth bigger on the rear sprocket, not sure how much of a difference that would make though?

And what the review mentioned about fooking off at 10,000rpm is right on the button

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
wingnut. said:
Thanks guys, it does sound more of a trait rather than a problem, I've just remembered its 2 teeth bigger on the rear sprocket, not sure how much of a difference that would make though?
as a rough rule, 3 teeth on the rear is worth 1 tooth off the front. so its already geared down for acceleration.

SpydieNut

5,959 posts

253 months

Thursday 26th March 2009
quotequote all
littleredrooster said:
It's a 'characteristic' of highly-tuned small engines. They need to be revved hard to produce any meaningful power. If you want an engine which will pull hard from 70 in 6th gear, you probably need a twin rather than a four.
An improvement can be made by putting a one-tooth smaller sprocket on the gearbox. This will have the effect of making the bike rev harder for any given road speed and improve pickup. It will, however, reduce your top speed as the engine will run out of revs earlier.
the man speaks sense biggrin

RSV-R anyone? biggrin