5.0 - are they more fragile?
5.0 - are they more fragile?
Author
Discussion

duke thrust

Original Poster:

1,680 posts

268 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
Hello all,

I was looking around a dealers yesteday at a couple of 4.0 Chimaera's and mentioned that what I was really looking for was a 5.0 or perhaps a 4.5. He declared (in lofty tones) that whilst they were good cars he would never have one as they are a lot more fragile, especilly the 5.0's

Any truth in this?

Cheers

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
"fragile"


that's a funny assessment!



Was his first language something other than English?


Perhaps he was getting the word "fragile" confused with "in' fast"


Never heard that before!

GreenV8S

31,014 posts

313 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
That is standard dealer speak for 'I don't have the car you want but maybe I can pursuade you to take one of these cars instead'. The 5 liter engines are generally much more desirable than the 4 liter engines.

2 sheds

2,529 posts

313 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
Non are fragile, the 500 engine probably won't cover the mileage of a standard Rover unit (as in 4.0L) without rebuild , but they can all reach over 100k. the 500 will be far more expensive to repair if anything does go wrong, a small price to pay for all that grunt
Tim

MOD500

2,687 posts

279 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
I would totally agree with the 'I have no 500's cos they are poo, but look at my lovely 400's' yarn. Load of rubbish! There are loads of Griff's around as well as the Chim running the 500 engine with few mechanical problems. The 500 engine is torque-tastic and is awesome.

Go for it!

You can make the 500 quite obscene too, if you tune it up a bit (Tornado chip, ACT bits, etc).

>> Edited by MOD500 on Saturday 5th June 13:21

whitechimp500

3,399 posts

300 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
Fragile my Cock .
Have done over 40 (hard) Track Days in mine plus fast road use with no problems.
Obviously tyres,brakes,services etc get done more often but no other isssue's.
.
The mans talking through his arse.

chim 500

108 posts

280 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
i went to trade mine yesterday a 1998 5 ltr mint condition the dealer said 500's dont sell as well as 4 ltrs and could only offer me 12,995 in part x for a tuscan, that,s main dealers for you, oh bye the way his car,s advitised as in mint condition he must have s..t in his eyes {north london main dealer}

MOD500

2,687 posts

279 months

Saturday 5th June 2004
quotequote all
chim 500 said:
i went to trade mine yesterday a 1998 5 ltr mint condition the dealer said 500's dont sell as well as 4 ltrs and could only offer me 12,995 in part x for a tuscan, that,s main dealers for you, oh bye the way his car,s advitised as in mint condition he must have s..t in his eyes {north london main dealer}


Funny you should say that, I have had similar figures from some main dealers. The best offers I have had have been from H.L Gorners in Warrington against the Nebula Black Tuscan S they have...ask for Mike Clarke (sales manager), top man and straight talking. The other dealer is Chris Neils in Cheshire against the black Noble 3R demo thay have. Though I appreciate its a long drag for you to come up here to God's country!!!

Feel free to mail me if you want the figures and details.

HTH

Best Regards


Martyn.

Steve_T

6,356 posts

301 months

Sunday 6th June 2004
quotequote all
54500 Miles in my 500 on original cam. Fragile - bx

>> Edited by Steve_T on Sunday 6th June 16:59

p7ulg

1,052 posts

312 months

Sunday 6th June 2004
quotequote all
Since when have sledgehammers been fragile?

duke thrust

Original Poster:

1,680 posts

268 months

Sunday 6th June 2004
quotequote all
Thanks chaps, that's what I wanted to hear!!

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
Steve_T said:
54500 Miles in my 500 on original cam.


Yeah?! Well they're capable of 84,500 - I know that!