That'll do
That'll do
Author
Discussion

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Thursday 28th February 2013
quotequote all
My 430 before and after mapped ignition by way of the 123tune distributor. Power run 'after' only between 5,000 and 6,000 rpm as a final check of sorts.



Seems to have done the trick, then. biggrin

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
tumbleweed

db418BHP

8,676 posts

250 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
900T-R said:
tumbleweed
Nobody understands as its all in foreign laugh

Chilliman

12,422 posts

191 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
700 Verm's.... that's mighty impressive Eric smile

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
oh dear, little englanders at it again tongue outwinkbiggrin

Left = power (PS DIN)
Right = torque (Nm)

Top curve = power
Lower curve = torque

You'll see that the top red line peaks at a nice round number '300' at 6,000 rpm, which incidentally is 40 bhp above where it was before (blue line) at this rpm. 'Before' power peaked at 274.

Better? smile

Chilliman

12,422 posts

191 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Only 300 Verms then wink

So, is the difference solely down to the new dizzy? I fitted a 123 dizzy to one of my MG's a few years back, and it made a very noticeable difference to starting, running and (better)fuel economy. It's telling me the standard dizzy is not keeping up, or is there more to it?

Chilli

davep

1,157 posts

314 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
900T-R said:
My 430 before and after mapped ignition by way of the 123tune distributor. Power run 'after' only between 5,000 and 6,000 rpm as a final check of sorts.



Seems to have done the trick, then. biggrin
You must be pleased with that result. Some questions: How much for the distributor, cable, drive wheel, software, etc? And did you fit a new coil?

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Only difference between 'before' and 'after' is indeed the dizzy and the stupid thing is the advance we ended up running above peak torque rpm is still within TVR specs for the OE dizzy (33 degrees, where TVR service literature either calls for 32 degrees at 3750 rpm or 34 at 4000) as the second map we were running at 29 degrees max advance for 95 RON fuel didn't really show a significant loss of power, if at all.

From the results it's quite clear the dizzy was holding the engine back all along, as the final result now fulfils the best expectations one would have from the configuration. And the 123 product does indeed feature clever stuff like spark balancing. But what exactly makes the huge difference compared to the Lucas dizzy if not the spark timing (max advance)... well so far I'm stumped really. Will investigate this further smile

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
davep said:
You must be pleased with that result. Some questions: How much for the distributor, cable, drive wheel, software, etc? And did you fit a new coil?
Coil was & is the Bosch item from ACT I've been using for a couple of years now.

No crank wheel/sensor or wiring changes (actually there is one extra wire on the distributor for switching between map 1 and map 2). Programmable with any Windows XP compatible laptop using a standard (but ideally shielded) USB cable.

I think retail for the Rover V8 unit is 505 euro over here.

davep

1,157 posts

314 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
900T-R, if your 430 is standard those curves for the 'before' Lucas set-up are nothing to sniff at either. Assuming those increases are apparent across the lower rev range, I'd say you've grabbed yourself a bargain there.

I've found a UK supplier (Southern Carbs) that does the Rover V8 post SD1 unit for £399.95, and I must say I'm tempted.

You mention elsewhere a misfire at 1200 rpm, did this arise after fitting the 123 dizzy? And did you fit a new dizzy drive wheel?


domV8

1,408 posts

211 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Would have thought, looking at the torque profile for the "before" graph, that the "after" line does not show your max torque (looking at it, prob around 4500rpm?)...

Dom

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Correct, we only did the power run for the 5,000-6,000 rpm intervals, just a quick check to see where we were going... we took the specified 32 degrees advance for the 3,500-4,000 intervals where we knew max torque would happen, the rest was more starting/idling/driveability work.

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
davep said:
900T-R, if your 430 is standard those curves for the 'before' Lucas set-up are nothing to sniff at either. Assuming those increases are apparent across the lower rev range, I'd say you've grabbed yourself a bargain there.

I've found a UK supplier (Southern Carbs) that does the Rover V8 post SD1 unit for £399.95, and I must say I'm tempted.

You mention elsewhere a misfire at 1200 rpm, did this arise after fitting the 123 dizzy? And did you fit a new dizzy drive wheel?
Engine is not standard (fairly elaborate rebuild with reliability & performance enhancements, still standard capacity and standard non-BV valve sizes as heads were rebuilt according to 'fast road spec' by CTM Performance in Dagenham), it has an ACT carbon twin throttle plenum & intake hoses, 45 mm ported intake manifold (by yours truly) and carbon trumpets, thermal gasket, ACT performance exhaust manifolds, Vectra injectors and 3.0 bar fuel pressure.

I had the existing drive wheel refitted to the new distributor as I feel it makes no sense mating a brand new drive wheel with an old one in the dist/oil pump drive mechanism...

Misfire at low revs was noticed after the install (it was heavy kangorooing at first), we were still playing with the vacuum advance mapping to eradicate it when we got sidetracked by a starter motor that wouldn't play ball anymore frown so getting it out and to a starter motor/alternator repair place became first priority and it was 6 pm when I was able to hit the road again...

TV8

3,542 posts

205 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Hi there, is the system still running the original lucal 14CUX system and standard TVR chip?

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all
Standard issue CUX14 with big-a55 Bosch airflow meter from a BMW V8 (frankly, you're better off using the ACT/Mark Adams Bosch meter as it's a known quantity and won't pose an airflow restriction until the mid-300s bhp level at least), fuel pressure regulator squeezed to give 3 bar and custom mapping. smile

OleVix

1,438 posts

178 months

Friday 1st March 2013
quotequote all

davep

1,157 posts

314 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
Interested to know if the misfire issue after the distributor install was resolved.

Looks like a Norwegian guy could also be interested.

900T-R

Original Poster:

20,406 posts

287 months

Sunday 16th June 2013
quotequote all
New lambdas installed one month and a couple of thousand miles ago, she runs very smoothly now... smilesmile