Twin Plenum
Twin Plenum
Author
Discussion

SILICONEKID345HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Are they worth bothering with ? and they are silly money .

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/111589255285

Sardonicus

19,442 posts

250 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
No

Chuffmeister

3,597 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
SILICONEKID345HP said:
Are they worth bothering with ? and they are silly money .

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/111589255285
I think you have answered your own question... Silly money. In fact at that price, I would say drug-induced dream world. I'm sure you could pick up an ACT carbon fibre plenum wth throttle bodies for around that price. However, if it sells at that price, I know what I'm going to start buying!

I haven't tried them myself, but I'm sure I read a thread a month or so ago from somebody with a good degree of experience, who said they tested a modded RV8 twin plenum on the dyno, and there was no difference in HP. The size of the plenum is more important from what I understand, which is why the ACT carbon fibre twin has a different trumpet base. The addition throttle body apparently makes for a smoother pick-up of revs.

I could of course be totally wrong, however,if you feel like blowing some spondoolies, I'm happy to mig you one together for £950! wink

SILICONEKID345HP

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

260 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Chuffmeister said:
I think you have answered your own question... Silly money. In fact at that price, I would say drug-induced dream world. I'm sure you could pick up an ACT carbon fibre plenum wth throttle bodies for around that price. However, if it sells at that price, I know what I'm going to start buying!

I haven't tried them myself, but I'm sure I read a thread a month or so ago from somebody with a good degree of experience, who said they tested a modded RV8 twin plenum on the dyno, and there was no difference in HP. The size of the plenum is more important from what I understand, which is why the ACT carbon fibre twin has a different trumpet base. The addition throttle body apparently makes for a smoother pick-up of revs.

I could of course be totally wrong, however,if you feel like blowing some spondoolies, I'm happy to mig you one together for £950! wink
I would of thought something like no more than £200 for that .

I`ve not seen a triple carbon one for sale ,only new .

Chuffmeister

3,597 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
SILICONEKID345HP said:
Chuffmeister said:
I think you have answered your own question... Silly money. In fact at that price, I would say drug-induced dream world. I'm sure you could pick up an ACT carbon fibre plenum wth throttle bodies for around that price. However, if it sells at that price, I know what I'm going to start buying!

I haven't tried them myself, but I'm sure I read a thread a month or so ago from somebody with a good degree of experience, who said they tested a modded RV8 twin plenum on the dyno, and there was no difference in HP. The size of the plenum is more important from what I understand, which is why the ACT carbon fibre twin has a different trumpet base. The addition throttle body apparently makes for a smoother pick-up of revs.

I could of course be totally wrong, however,if you feel like blowing some spondoolies, I'm happy to mig you one together for £950! wink
I would of thought something like no more than £200 for that .
Exactly!

jojackson4

3,049 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
There's another one on the bay he is just on glue and is asking £350 or something like that

macdeb

8,758 posts

284 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Fookin' ell! nearly spat my Stella out when I read that yikes

Sardonicus

19,442 posts

250 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
macdeb said:
Fookin' ell! nearly spat my Stella out when I read that yikes
Peroni here Mac, posh stuff

jojackson4

3,049 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
silly
Get some work done am of to roll around under the car not drinking beer rolleyes

Chuffmeister

3,597 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
I noticed that the seller is 'Cheshire Cat Engineering'... I'd be grinning like a Cheshire Cat if I sold one for that price!

Goaty Bill 2

3,592 posts

148 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
I once travelled 150 miles and paid $350 for a 'six pack' manifold for my father's 409 powered 1964 Impala SS convertible.
Yes; that really is a 409 as in the Beach Boys "she's so fine my 409", in a Chevrolet Impala SS convertible.

Point is; there was no way on God's green earth that the original six pack (3 x 2 barrel down draft carburettors) would ever make as many horses as an aftermarket Holley manifold and 4 barrel 750-800 cfm carburettor.
It isn't always about power. Sometimes it's about kudos / originality / rarity value.

I can assure you that the man who eventually bought that car from my father is very appreciative of my efforts. Thirty-five years later, he is still running that set up, and proud of it.

Chuffmeister

3,597 posts

166 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
I once travelled 150 miles and paid $350 for a 'six pack' manifold for my father's 409 powered 1964 Impala SS convertible.
Yes; that really is a 409 as in the Beach Boys "she's so fine my 409", in a Chevrolet Impala SS convertible.

Point is; there was no way on God's green earth that the original six pack (3 x 2 barrel down draft carburettors) would ever make as many horses as an aftermarket Holley manifold and 4 barrel 750-800 cfm carburettor.
It isn't always about power. Sometimes it's about kudos / originality / rarity value.

I can assure you that the man who eventually bought that car from my father is very appreciative of my efforts. Thirty-five years later, he is still running that set up, and proud of it.
So you're off to Cheshire then?

phazed

22,464 posts

233 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Precat runs one of those twin plenums on a 450 griff. The car makes around 320 horses iirc.

My old 4.6 ran a 72mm single plenum and had at least as much power.

Goaty Bill 2

3,592 posts

148 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Chuffmeister said:
So you're off to Cheshire then?
Not original biggrin

db484bhpv8

8,676 posts

249 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
I cant see the ebay add here at work.
I assume its an old Rover SD1 late Vitesse.
Its worth money..... but only to an old Rover SD1 Vitesse

Sardonicus

19,442 posts

250 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
I once travelled 150 miles and paid $350 for a 'six pack' manifold for my father's 409 powered 1964 Impala SS convertible.
Yes; that really is a 409 as in the Beach Boys "she's so fine my 409", in a Chevrolet Impala SS convertible.

Point is; there was no way on God's green earth that the original six pack (3 x 2 barrel down draft carburettors) would ever make as many horses as an aftermarket Holley manifold and 4 barrel 750-800 cfm carburettor.
It isn't always about power. Sometimes it's about kudos / originality / rarity value.

I can assure you that the man who eventually bought that car from my father is very appreciative of my efforts. Thirty-five years later, he is still running that set up, and proud of it.
Mmmm a BB Chevy with a six pack yum always facintaed me this I know it works but GM should of bunged another 2 barrel in there to make it a carb per cylinder scratchchin probably bulkhead and dizzy limitations I would imagine frown I went out in a stock factory manual (stick shift) 67 Nova SS 350 once eek but also got to drive a modded 66 with a 454 auto yikes blimey no wonder my Bro-In-Law swears by BB's hehe


Edited by Sardonicus on Tuesday 3rd February 21:41

Goaty Bill 2

3,592 posts

148 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Sardonicus said:
Goaty Bill 2 said:
I once travelled 150 miles and paid $350 for a 'six pack' manifold for my father's 409 powered 1964 Impala SS convertible.
Yes; that really is a 409 as in the Beach Boys "she's so fine my 409", in a Chevrolet Impala SS convertible.

Point is; there was no way on God's green earth that the original six pack (3 x 2 barrel down draft carburettors) would ever make as many horses as an aftermarket Holley manifold and 4 barrel 750-800 cfm carburettor.
It isn't always about power. Sometimes it's about kudos / originality / rarity value.

I can assure you that the man who eventually bought that car from my father is very appreciative of my efforts. Thirty-five years later, he is still running that set up, and proud of it.
Mmmm a BB Chevy with a six pack yum always facintaed me this I know it works but GM should of bunged another 2 barrel in there to make it a carb per cylinder scratchchin probably bulkhead and dizzy limitations I would imagine frown I went out in a stock factory manual (stick shift) 67 Nova SS 350 once eek but also got to drive a modded 66 with a 454 auto yikes blimey no wonder my Bro-In-Law swears by BB's hehe
Actually, the 409 (along with 348 and 427 versions) was the first generation BBC see the wiki, and drastically different from the version I grew up with, and which the modern versions are based upon.

The wiki doesn't mention the six pack, though the one I bought did have GM markings and part number, but there was a dual 4 barrel option as well.
Those damned Rochester and Carter carburettors would have been absolute Hell to tune compared to a Holley (I know as I had a couple of Rochesters).

From a technical standpoint the first generation BBCs would be slightly more useful than a boat anchor by comparison now, but again; it's the kudos / originality / rarity value in having one.

I always swore by the BBC. To get 500+ hp out of one was child's play and the result, even in a full bodied Yank mid-size, is an amazing driving experience.


ChilliWhizz

12,422 posts

190 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Technically speaking of course it's not a twin plenum.

That's all.

Sardonicus

19,442 posts

250 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
Goaty Bill 2 said:
Actually, the 409 (along with 348 and 427 versions) was the first generation BBC see the wiki, and drastically different from the version I grew up with, and which the modern versions are based upon.

The wiki doesn't mention the six pack, though the one I bought did have GM markings and part number, but there was a dual 4 barrel option as well.
Those damned Rochester and Carter carburettors would have been absolute Hell to tune compared to a Holley (I know as I had a couple of Rochesters).

From a technical standpoint the first generation BBCs would be slightly more useful than a boat anchor by comparison now, but again; it's the kudos / originality / rarity value in having one.

I always swore by the BBC. To get 500+ hp out of one was child's play and the result, even in a full bodied Yank mid-size, is an amazing driving experience.
thumbup I know nowadays the BB's are heavy but they are still an awesome lump of cast iron scratchchin the Pop above was powered by a crate LS7 (manual BB Corvette NOS) (thats the original LS7 rather than the late) factory GM solid/mechanical cam no auto option came with a flywheel and IIRC intakes and valves that were huge topped off with a Dominator carb that was not factory though laugh sorry chaps back on topic getmecoat I could talk about American muscle car stuff till the cows come home whistle

rigga

8,806 posts

230 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2015
quotequote all
ChilliWhizz said:
Technically speaking of course it's not a twin plenum.

That's all.
God dammit he's right .....