Rear Tyre Width?
Rear Tyre Width?
Author
Discussion

chimleic

Original Poster:

254 posts

265 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
I'm seeking a set of new tyres for my standard 16" TVR rear alloys. At present, I'm running 225/60/16/ZR SO3s.

Does anyone know if it is practical to run a 245/45/16/ZR SO3 on the standard rear alloys? If it is possible, what are the drawbacks, if any?

Cheers,
Andy

TheHobbit

1,189 posts

280 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
IIRC, 245/45ZR16 was the original size for 5 litre cars. 225/50ZR16 was for 4 litre cars? There's a page on it in "The Bible", but I can't find mine currently.....

GreenV8S

31,017 posts

313 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
245 will fit (as was factory fit on some models) but my experience is that 225 is the best width for those rims, the wider tyres seem to distort under heavy cornering. But you could just try a wider tyre and see how you get on with it? It isn't going to do anything disasterous.

V8 Archie

4,703 posts

277 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
I think the 245s are standard for the Estorils. The standard 5-spokes are probably designed for the 225s.

The Surveyor

7,624 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
I thought the Chimaera 5 spoke rear was the same size as the Griffith rear. So wouldn't it be safe to assume that the 245 would fit on either without any difficulty.

I had 245's on the back of my old Griffith and they looked very comfortable on the rims and will be planning on putting the same on my Chimaera once the tread gets down a little more.

The Surveyor

7,624 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
Just out of interest, there is a pair of brand new S-03's on Ebay at the moment, they look like they still have the wrappers on and they are 245's for the Griffith / Chimaera rears. i would have thought that the bidding war will be quite explosive....

'Now lets have a clean contest with no biting, gouging or chest wig pulling'....

chimleic

Original Poster:

254 posts

265 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
Ssssshhhhhhhh! That's what I was looking at!

tacoma

215 posts

263 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
I think a lot of us are looking, but don't tell the other!!!

chimleic

Original Poster:

254 posts

265 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
Will be fun to see how much the price rises. If they go above the cost of 2 regular sized SO3s (inc P&P) I'll be bowing out.

shpub

8,507 posts

301 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
chimleic said:
I'm seeking a set of new tyres for my standard 16" TVR rear alloys. At present, I'm running 225/60/16/ZR SO3s.

Does anyone know if it is practical to run a 245/45/16/ZR SO3 on the standard rear alloys? If it is possible, what are the drawbacks, if any?

Cheers,
Andy


Yep been doing it for years. I find it a lot better than the 225. Had both and swapped between them over a few days and the 245's offered better grip.

19560

14,332 posts

287 months

Monday 23rd May 2005
quotequote all
chimleic said:
At present, I'm running 225/60/16/ZR SO3s. Is it practical to run a 245/45/16/ZR SO3 on the standard rear alloys?

Yes, see shpub reply and Green for drawbacks. Note olso that 225/60 is an oddball size thrown on. 225/55/16 was standard (why not just stick to this?) and people usually switch to the 225/50/16 Griff fitting.

M@H

11,298 posts

301 months

Tuesday 24th May 2005
quotequote all
chimleic said:

Does anyone know if it is practical to run a 245/45/16/ZR SO3 on the standard rear alloys?


I ran these on my 93 400 for ages (well SO2 pp's but same principal) on the standard rims.. no problems at all

jellison

12,803 posts

306 months

Tuesday 24th May 2005
quotequote all
Need the 245 (and I really need even more) on 500 and up - less power i'd go 225 for more slidy fun.