Oil Pressure Sender woes
Oil Pressure Sender woes
Author
Discussion

geordiepingu

Original Poster:

344 posts

82 months

Thursday 5th November 2020
quotequote all
Hi folks

I realise there's about 12 billion threads on senders, but wanted to ask some advice for a bizarre problem I'm having.

I decided to replace the sender on my 400HC serp '96 as it was weeping oil, and bought a Telemetrix unit calibrated for Caerbont 0-100psi (I have Caerbont gauges). Now oddly enough, on ignition on engine off, the idiot light comes on as expected from the switch, yet, the needle rises drastically to 100PSI! On engine start (cold), the gauge moves to 60psi, with the indicated pressure increasing as the oil comes up to temperature (70psi warm idle).

Seeing this behaviour, I decided to try a spare cheapo VDO clone of the same thread pitch and calibration that I had lying around. Sure enough, 60 psi cold. 100psi off, etc. It's almost like something's wired backwards?

To note, I had the normal inaccurate readings before from the original TVR sender, although 0psi indicated as 0psi. The sender worked perfectly, just started weeping oil.

This is the Telemetrix unit I bought:
https://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/p/telemetrix-oi...

Have I used the wrong oil pressure sender x2? Can I rectify this by changing the gauge polarity by removing the dash top? Any insight appreciated! Would much rather have it display something closer to the correct oil pressure rather than resort to one from TVR parts (that and I'd rather not have to buy another sender).

TIA

blaze_away

1,633 posts

234 months

Thursday 5th November 2020
quotequote all
Have you used ptfe tape on the thread, thus preventing it earthing ?

geordiepingu

Original Poster:

344 posts

82 months

Thursday 5th November 2020
quotequote all
No PTFE - sender is grounding against the engine block.

geordiepingu

Original Poster:

344 posts

82 months

Thursday 5th November 2020
quotequote all
Bump with a bit of a development. I spoke to one of the guys at Merlin Motorsport who confirmed after the original TVR sender part number that I did in fact have the wrong sender. So I suppose now I'm back to square one. Merlin called Caerbont who suggested this would be the correct sender: (CBC-OS-18)
https://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/p/smiths-cobra-...

Since I suppose part of this exercise is to get a bit of a better indicative oil pressure from my TVR, which oil pressure sender do I buy assuming what TVR Parts sell is also just as inaccurate?

QBee

22,014 posts

165 months

Thursday 5th November 2020
quotequote all
Caerbont will know what sender you need - they did when I bought and oil temperature gauge and sender from them.

Dalamar

302 posts

96 months

Tuesday 10th November 2020
quotequote all
The following thread might help you. I contains info on a alternative send and the resistance measurements that match the sender to the gauge in our cars.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

My sender is still working, nice and leak free after 1500 miles so far.

geordiepingu

Original Poster:

344 posts

82 months

Saturday 14th November 2020
quotequote all
Dalamar said:
The following thread might help you. I contains info on a alternative send and the resistance measurements that match the sender to the gauge in our cars.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

My sender is still working, nice and leak free after 1500 miles so far.
Awesome thanks - bought and will give it a go in place of the tvrparts one upon arrival :-)

geordiepingu

Original Poster:

344 posts

82 months

Sunday 29th November 2020
quotequote all
No joy! I suppose it’s going to be the tvr parts one after all?



Dalamar

302 posts

96 months

Thursday 3rd December 2020
quotequote all
[quote=geordiepingu]No joy! I suppose it’s going to be the tvr parts one after all?

Just a thought, if you are getting full scale deflection - going all the way to the right - then the signal might be grounded. Might be worth checking your connections again. There is that other connection for the low pressure light that might be confusing things.