14 CUX V8 won't run when hot.
14 CUX V8 won't run when hot.
Author
Discussion

rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Sunday 28th November 2021
quotequote all
Apologies for polluting the TVR pages with Land Rovers, but it is the same engine and ignition system. I am at my wits end with this thing, and the next step is to throw the entire CUX system in the bin and Megasquirt it, unless someone has a bright idea.

I have a Defender 110 with a 4.6 non-serp V8 in it. It has always run the 14CUX hotwire system, and has always been "passable" rather than "great". The ECU has a Tornado 4.6 chip in it and sparks are provided by a 123 ignition distributor. It is running a catalyst map with lambdas. Other than that, it is a standard 3.9 system.

The symptoms of the problem are:

1) It starts perfectly, on the button, from cold. At this point, it idles beautifully and is perfectly drivable.
2) With Rovergauge plugged in, all of the readings are sensible - lambdas are saying "about right", engine temperature is sane, fuel temperature is sane. There are no error codes. The air mass and throttle data seem good and react in a sensible manner when the engine is revved.
3) As it warms up, it continues to behave normally.
4) When it gets hot (about 90c), it suddenly flips into a mode where the idle is flaky, and there is zero power - basically the engine dies, it has the ability to idle, and maybe move the truck at walking pace, but it is knocking and banging in the exhaust. You can spin it up to 3000 rpm and it sounds fine, but there is no power at all.

Let it cool down again, and it is perfect.

I've checked the sparks with an oscilloscope, as I assumed it was a "warming up" issue with something electronic, but the sparks are fine - nice profile, no change between poor running and good running.

I've changed the AFM with a spare, no difference

I've disconnected the Lambdas to provoke it into the limp map - no difference.

Anyone hand anything like this - the only thing similar seems to be the "swapping of fuel and water sensors" - but mine seem right. They both start at ambient, the engine temp goes up to ~90 and the fans come on, and the fuel temp rises to about 25 with the bonnet open.



wuckfitracing

990 posts

159 months

Sunday 28th November 2021
quotequote all
Yep you have answered your own question. Swap sensors one at a time. Water first.

Edited by wuckfitracing on Sunday 28th November 21:50

rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Monday 29th November 2021
quotequote all
I don’t think I was clear on the sensors. There is a well known failure mode where someone mixes up the coolant and fuel temperature sensors - this makes the car think it is cold and runs incredibly rich. Mine seem to be fine: my coolant sensor (as per Rover gauge) starts at ambient and climbs gradually to about 90c when the fans come on. My fuel sensor starts at ambient, and gets to 25 - 35 depending on whether the bonnet is open.


Belle427

10,749 posts

249 months

Monday 29th November 2021
quotequote all
Coolant temp sensor would be the one to look at normally with this kind of fault.
Have you given the Afm plug/wires a good wiggle when it's hot as this is quite a common issue in the Tvr.

geeman237

1,309 posts

201 months

Monday 29th November 2021
quotequote all
I had very similar symptoms on a 1992 Griffith 4.0. I replaced the ECU on a very Rover knowledgeable persons advice and that cured it. Something internal to the ECU must have failed. I would have thought you could borrow a known good one from someone to test the theory. Make sure its one in the same date range as yours and has the removable chip.


rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
geeman237 said:
I had very similar symptoms on a 1992 Griffith 4.0. I replaced the ECU on a very Rover knowledgeable persons advice and that cured it. Something internal to the ECU must have failed. I would have thought you could borrow a known good one from someone to test the theory. Make sure its one in the same date range as yours and has the removable chip.
Hmmm, that's not a good thought. If the ECU is dead, then it will be a megasquirt job. I'll have to find someone locally with a 3.9 I can pillage for a morning.

My current plan is:

- Spoof the temperature sensor with a suitable resistor that says "85C". Just in case the sensor is occasionally breaking the connection.
- Check the fuel pressure. No reason to think it is wrong, but worth checking
- Test with someone else's ECU if I can find one

Failing that, strip the whole lot off and put something modern on.


Steve_D

13,799 posts

274 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
Where in UK are you?
I have a spare ECU we use in our workshop for this type of test plus we have seen a failed ECU on a customers car.
We are Fareham south coast.

steve

blaze_away

1,601 posts

229 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
I know you've tested the coil but those symptoms are classic coil breaking down when hot. Its easy to check just swap it for a known good one.

QBee

21,776 posts

160 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
blaze_away said:
I know you've tested the coil but those symptoms are classic coil breaking down when hot. Its easy to check just swap it for a known good one.
Rather what I was thinking, (plus ignition amplifier).

gavgavgav

1,566 posts

245 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
Engine earth strap? (something like a fan could be turning on and the earth could be flakey)

rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
Steve_D said:
Where in UK are you?
I have a spare ECU we use in our workshop for this type of test plus we have seen a failed ECU on a customers car.
We are Fareham south coast.

steve
Thanks for the offer - I’m in Berkshire, which would be quite a schlep! There is a Land Rover place down the road that might have one on the shelf.

The coil - yes, it was my first thought, mainly because Rover Gauge shows absolutely nothing changing between good and bad behaviour. But Rover Gauge doesn’t know about sparks. I’ve got a spare coil, so I’ll put that on the “try it out list” - but I’m not hopeful as the coil is out on the inner wing, so not really exposed to heat. The ignition amp (as such) is in the 123 ignition distributor, I’ll put the scope on it and see if there is anything odd, but the spark profile looked fine. The only bit that points to the distributor is the fact that this only seems to happen when the reported distributor temperature hits 60C. 55C - its all fine.

Voltage - everything is reporting fine, both in the distributor and ECU, and the engine is crap whether the fans are off or on.

Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

125 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
Timing?

Steve_D

13,799 posts

274 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
rxe said:
............But Rover Gauge doesn’t know about sparks.
It does in as much as it is seeing the signal from the dizzy to the coil and using that to display revs. Although the revs may look good on RG that does not mean the coil is producing the spark.

Steve

geeman237

1,309 posts

201 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
rxe said:
Hmmm, that's not a good thought. If the ECU is dead, then it will be a megasquirt job. I'll have to find someone locally with a 3.9 I can pillage for a morning.

My current plan is:

- Spoof the temperature sensor with a suitable resistor that says "85C". Just in case the sensor is occasionally breaking the connection.
- Check the fuel pressure. No reason to think it is wrong, but worth checking
- Test with someone else's ECU if I can find one

Failing that, strip the whole lot off and put something modern on.
I went back to my RoverGauge data logs when I was experiencing similar symptoms. Have you run RoverGauge to log the data of the car driving to this cut out point and then converted the 'raw' data into a MS Excel spreadsheet? When I did this on my Griffith I looked through all the data and found the point of failure ie the cut out point. The data showed the Mains Voltage spike to 4,000 volts from the normal 13-ish volt running. It appeared something was causing an ECU mis-read. With some help from someone with more 14CUX knowledge than me, they suggested a new EPROM chip first. I did that and no change, still got the mis-fire. Next was trying a replacement ECU and the problem went away.

My recommendation is get the vehicle warmed up then take it for a drive with the data logger running and drive until it exhibits the symptoms. Download the data and convert it into Excel and clean it up and try and identify the time of the failure and check the data around that point. Maybe the chip has gone bad, or maybe its the ECU like mine. Keep us posted.

blaze_away

1,601 posts

229 months

Tuesday 30th November 2021
quotequote all
Thats a pretty good call from geeman237

If you need help on data handling give me shout.

I have specialist software to chart the data and easily pinpoint the moment things go bad and see what RG is showing us.

rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
Running it with logging on is a good shout, I'll try that, I'm pretty handy with Excel so I should be OK! It might show something up.

Timing - I have run various ignition profiles in the distributor. My first change was to go back to a very conservative map from my normal over advance at idle. Made no difference at all.

I can put a trace on the coil switching voltage, and the coil output, and log all of that too.


blaze_away

1,601 posts

229 months

Wednesday 1st December 2021
quotequote all
rxe said:
Running it with logging on is a good shout, I'll try that, I'm pretty handy with Excel so I should be OK! It might show something up.

Timing - I have run various ignition profiles in the distributor. My first change was to go back to a very conservative map from my normal over advance at idle. Made no difference at all.

I can put a trace on the coil switching voltage, and the coil output, and log all of that too.
FWIW I too am 4.6 with 123 Distributor

My Ignition map is as below. (Note it was dyno mapped fuel and ignition at this on similar 4.6 with Turbo so has curve extension into +ve pressure part of the map, anyway up to STP is what works on mine which is NA.)



rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Tuesday 7th December 2021
quotequote all
Apologies, no updates, had a busy week-end. I did find the spare coil though.

blitzracing

6,414 posts

236 months

Saturday 11th December 2021
quotequote all
Taking 2 steps backwards-

You cant have the same readings between failed and working- if the HT is failing you will get large amount "adding fuel" trim as the lambda probe mis reads unburnt fuel as a lean mixture so the ECU adds as much fuel as it can to try and get the probe to switch. The devil will be in the detail so to speak- what row is the fuel map in between working and failing at the same RPM with no load? As the airflow is the major control of the injector timing we need to start here. External temperature fuelling is added after the fuel amount is set by the map against airflow. Also check the RPM reading is stable in RoverGauge as a failing amp with give you erratic or no RPM reading

HT wise , remove the king lead and tape the end about 1cm away from the chassis and crank the engine and observe the spark. It should be able to jump this gap easily. I would not exceed this gap as the bigger the gap, the bigger the spikes you get in the coil primary that glitches the amp so can stress the internal semiconductors. 1 cm relates to about 10kv arc.

Where are you in Berkshire?

rxe

Original Poster:

6,700 posts

119 months

Sunday 12th December 2021
quotequote all
Somewhere between Ascot & Maidenhead…

I had time for a quick play today, and I thought I had it, but no. Fuel pressure was high - 3 bar. So I turned down the regulator and got 2.5 bar with vac disconnected, and 2 bar with vacuum connected, per the spec. Pressure was rock steady, so I awaited warm up again … and it was still crap. So, not the fuel pressure.

Mark - interesting thoughts on the map. From memory (and this is a bit anecdotal because I wasn’t really looking for it) when it is happy, it is in the second row of the map. The “dark box” is hunting around left & right depending on the revs, but stays around row 2. When it is unhappy, it is down much further, but it is hard really to see as the revs are generally on the floor by then.

It’s got to be the damn sparks hasn’t it? I will try your king lead experiment when I get a chance. Off oh holiday next week, but I have the whole of Christmas off for fiddling!