40 Litre, 4.5 Litre, 5.0 Litre
40 Litre, 4.5 Litre, 5.0 Litre
Author
Discussion

bernietopcdo

Original Poster:

23 posts

247 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
I own a 4.0 litre Chimaera and will be changing it in about 6 months for a new model. Is there a noticable difference in the range of engine sizes performance wise, also how does this effect the insurance and petrol consumption

sparkythecat

8,099 posts

285 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
There are a few threads on this very topic.

Here's one to start you off

www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=290047&f=8&h=0

Sharky500

413 posts

259 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
Based on my research of driving 7 Chims before I got mine:

In terms of driving feel and outright performance:

BIG difference between 4.0 and 4.5
Not so big difference between 4.5 and 5.0
Massive difference between 4.0 and 5.0

Consumption? (Mixed Driving)
4.0 = 24mpg = ~260 mile safe range
4.5 = 22mpg = ~242 mile safe range
5.0 = 20mpg = ~220 mile safe range

Just get a GOOD one, be it 4.5 or 5.0 - that is the most improtant thing, IMO

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,031 posts

265 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
I'd like to try one of them forty litre babies!

chlomeara

31 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
Regretabbly not tried the 5.0ltr but swapped froma 4ltr to 4.5ltr earlier this year and there is a big difference in performance. Fuel consumption down at 20 mpg, the 4.0 ltr was a bit better. You don't have one of these cars if you worry that much about the costs. The diesel day car does 40+ but is hardly in the same league....

jasandjules

72,611 posts

259 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
They are all fast. The 5.0 seemed to me to be a bit faster than the 4.5 I drove. But not much in it

biggiles

2,170 posts

255 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
The 5 is significantly faster than the 4.0. It's only a few bhps and ccs, but the torque is very noticeable.

I'd like to try the 40 though referenced in the title...

Nuggs

4,640 posts

264 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
I drove quite a few before buying mine. As has been said, big difference between the 4 and 5. HOWEVER, I plumped for the 4.0 as I found it a bit more tractable - easier to get the power down earlier without back trying to overtake front. It was also my first foray into a 'proper' sportscar, so I erred on the side of caution.

I haven't regretted the decision, I don't care that it's not the quickest and never will be. It's all (brake) horses for courses, and I love it

zippee

14,132 posts

264 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
Nuggs said:
I drove quite a few before buying mine. As has been said, big difference between the 4 and 5. HOWEVER, I plumped for the 4.0 as I found it a bit more tractable - easier to get the power down earlier without back trying to overtake front. It was also my first foray into a 'proper' sportscar, so I erred on the side of caution.

I haven't regretted the decision, I don't care that it's not the quickest and never will be. It's all (brake) horses for courses, and I love it


Same here, though I never managed to test a 4.5.
Went for the 4.o for a couple of reasons;
Firstly it being my first ever TVR I thought I'd better play safe and start 'small'.
Secondly I found the 400 a bit easier to drive round town etc. though I believe this can vary from car to car.
Thirdly, whilst there is a big difference in performance the 400 can hardly be called a slow car - if I ever feel I REALLY need the extra speed then I'll upgrade but for now my little baby provides me with more than enough.

jasandjules

72,611 posts

259 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
Agree, a 4.0 is the ideal starter TVR Chimaera, but here the OP has a 4 already, and wants more poke...

I think either 4.5 or 5.0 will be good though, as long as it is a Chimaera, it is a fun car.

DavHughes

1,261 posts

257 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
I don't think there's much between a 5 litre and a 4.5. However, two things you might consider -

a) Re-sale may be better on a 5 litre - as there are less around.
b) It feels good to have a 5 litre - silly I know - but its nice when people ask how big it is

Dav

mouseymousey

2,642 posts

267 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
Sharky500 said:


Consumption? (Mixed Driving)
4.0 = 24mpg = ~260 mile safe range
4.5 = 22mpg = ~242 mile safe range
5.0 = 20mpg = ~220 mile safe range



Based on those figures I must have a 5 litre and not a 4 litre then

TVRTimH

88 posts

244 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
my first TVR also, bought the 4.5 to get as much bang for buck etc. Never looked back the car is great in all conditions,traffic included (appart from todays rain - when it breaks traction it reeaallyy lets go)

puffsorted2

2,442 posts

255 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2006
quotequote all
Just gone from a 4.0 Chimaera to a Griff 500, its not the power difference thats noticable its the torque. The 500 makes you into a lazy driver, no need ever to change out of third! the sheer grunt from 2000 revs is sensational. Once above 4k I can't really notice any difference.

Ribol

11,995 posts

288 months

Thursday 3rd August 2006
quotequote all
When I was looking around I drove a good few 400/450s, there was little to choose between them. In fact a good 400(what I ended up buying) is better than an average 450, hence why buying a "good" one is so important.
The 500 is on a higher level performance wise(torque is very impressive) as is fuel consumption on short/town use.
The late cars(mine is "X" Reg) use all the same running gear(500 has different clutch IIRC) regardless of engine size so common sense would suggest a less powerful car is likely to wear things out slower.
Really good cars are not so plentiful now for obvious reasons but if you find one you won't regret it - regardless of engine size.

dr chuff

296 posts

314 months

Thursday 3rd August 2006
quotequote all
I changed up from a 4 to a 5 litre purely for track work; I was being outdragged by Griffs on the straight.
On the road there's not a lot of difference. I hear a rumour somewhere that 4 litres are louder and sound better than 5s. 5s used to have bigger brakes too, but I think the later chimaeras all have the same brakes.
The torque is noticably more and the 5 litre can be a handful - I've spun big time at Bedford and Snetterton, and lost it 120mph at Goodwood (and survived). I had mine chipped and tuned by Mark Adams.
Going around Bedford I used 3rd and 4th only once going - afterwards a friend took me round in his Impreza 22B, using 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th and driving like a nutter with no fear.

Happy hunting,

Dr C

mac5

254 posts

286 months

Thursday 3rd August 2006
quotequote all
Have owned all three,

Started with a 5ltr, absolute animal.
the a later 4Ltr far to slow when changing from a 5ltr
now a late 4.5ltr great compromise if you can live with the word compromise.

If you have not owned any other Tiv the 4 is great but you will always be thinking what if i had?

MAC5

derbygreg

365 posts

252 months

Friday 4th August 2006
quotequote all
I found after test driving a few chims that the 4.0 HC i went for felt allot faster than some of the 4,5s.... its just a bit of a pig in town under 2K rpm...

p400pls

404 posts

257 months

Friday 4th August 2006
quotequote all
There is something that no-one has mentioned so far that I always find, and that is the difference between my daily driver and the TVR !

Every time I feel like I have strapped myself to a rocket.

This may of course be because I drive a Berlingo every day and you chaps have far more exotic vehicles for daily use.

IM

34,302 posts

247 months

Friday 4th August 2006
quotequote all
p400pls said:
This may of course be because I drive a Berlingo every day...