Increasing plenum capacity...
Discussion
...stuck an SC-Power plenum packer on this weekend and am completely surprised at the different 'feel' of the car. The claim is that the OEM plenum is sized to match the original capacity of the engine (ie 'only' 3500cc) and *should* be at least the same capacity as whatever is the actual capacity now being run. I thought it couldn't do any harm to try and might help a little with reducing temperatures as it has a decent heat-sink area, but, there is very noticeable real difference. Can't honestly put it down to anything else (and it's not been on a RR), but I'm happy 
Pics possible if anyone wants to see what I'm wittering on about

Pics possible if anyone wants to see what I'm wittering on about

2Munkys said:
Yup, pic's please.
And what is the difference you refer to Pupp; can you describe it for us?
And what is the difference you refer to Pupp; can you describe it for us?

Just feels a bit more 'urgent', sorry, that's a crap description I know and nothing like empiric enough. I just wasn't expecting to notice anything (suppose it could be the old placebo effect).
CRE said:
They are the original factory rocker covers that were cast for the earlier engines (before the bean counters took over!).
I am sure that roller rockers would fit underneath because they are the same as the RV8 Tuscan challenge covers from back then.
Jamie
Can confirm that they do, I have a set of yella terra's on mine with no clearance problemsI am sure that roller rockers would fit underneath because they are the same as the RV8 Tuscan challenge covers from back then.
Jamie
Gassing Station | Chimaera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




£150 ish quid