Discussion
Sounds a little steep for a '94 but in the end it's all about condition. My only concern would be the low mileage; these cars do suffer if they are left standing in cold damp garages.
For that money the car should have a solid chassis and that means one that you can see. Don't be fooled by lashings of underseal, that often hides big money problems.
Low mileage means nothing, condition means everything.
For that money the car should have a solid chassis and that means one that you can see. Don't be fooled by lashings of underseal, that often hides big money problems.
Low mileage means nothing, condition means everything.
Condition!!! Also, contrary to the usual, [usually by high mileage owners] mileage DOES matter. A properly looked after low mileage car will allways be better than a high mileage equivalent.
[before I face a barrage of complaints from high milers etc, I did say a properly looked after low mileage car, and equivalent car]
On paper, 6 year owner, history, and mot's to back mileage sounds a good starting point. Don't be swayed by looking for a bargain as that 'bargain' may cost you more in the long run. If it looks too cheap to be true, it usually is.
[before I face a barrage of complaints from high milers etc, I did say a properly looked after low mileage car, and equivalent car]
On paper, 6 year owner, history, and mot's to back mileage sounds a good starting point. Don't be swayed by looking for a bargain as that 'bargain' may cost you more in the long run. If it looks too cheap to be true, it usually is.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 20:48
macdeb said:
Condition!!! Also, contrary to the usual, [usually by high mileage owners] mileage DOES matter. A properly looked after low mileage car will allways be better than a high mileage equivalent.
[before I face a barrage of complaints from high milers etc, I did say a properly looked after low mileage car, and equivalent car]
Nope, sorry have to disagree. Very low milers unless they have been carcooned will give problems, usually electrics etc.[before I face a barrage of complaints from high milers etc, I did say a properly looked after low mileage car, and equivalent car]
The best car you will buy will be something that has been used but maintained by someone enthusiaticaly, they will have ironed out the day to day niggles such as cooling issues, bushes etc. A 29k 15 year old car has been held as more of a trophy than a treasured ride.
Condition all the way, they don't like being left, it is a hand built British sports car, it will break down, bits will fall off.
Get it inspected by a respected local indie and go from there. nothing more to say.
More miles, more bits likely to drop off. IF it has been held as a trophy car or cacooned, then that is the car I would buy rather than one that has been ragged to within an inch of it's life around a track week in, week out.
By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, [500 griffs] one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was appalling in comparison to the '94 car I had before.
By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, [500 griffs] one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was appalling in comparison to the '94 car I had before.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:05
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:13
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:20
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:23
The comment about low versus high is not relevant, both are bad.
Low mileage means trouble, end of story. I spent my youth restoring classic sports cars and have experienced plenty of issues resulting from low milers. A '94 car with average miles, say 50 or 60k would be about right. 30k isn't bad but does indicate that the car may have been left unused for long periods.
I counter the comment above from someone who obviously needs to protect the value of his low miler.
Low mileage means trouble, end of story. I spent my youth restoring classic sports cars and have experienced plenty of issues resulting from low milers. A '94 car with average miles, say 50 or 60k would be about right. 30k isn't bad but does indicate that the car may have been left unused for long periods.
I counter the comment above from someone who obviously needs to protect the value of his low miler.
tvrbob said:
The comment about low versus high is not relevant, both are bad.
Low mileage means trouble, end of story. I spent my youth restoring classic sports cars and have experienced plenty of issues resulting from low milers. A '94 car with average miles, say 50 or 60k would be about right. 30k isn't bad but does indicate that the car may have been left unused for long periods.
I counter the comment above from someone who obviously needs to protect the value of his low miler.
Err, you know NOTHING of my intentions. Just trying to help someone seeking advice and not 'feathering my nest'. I SAID CONDITION, did I not? Grow up.Low mileage means trouble, end of story. I spent my youth restoring classic sports cars and have experienced plenty of issues resulting from low milers. A '94 car with average miles, say 50 or 60k would be about right. 30k isn't bad but does indicate that the car may have been left unused for long periods.
I counter the comment above from someone who obviously needs to protect the value of his low miler.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:27
macdeb said:
More miles, more bits likely to drop off. IF it has been held as a trophy car or cacooned, then that is the car I would buy rather than one that has been ragged to within an inch of it's life around a track week in, week out.
By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was miles worse than the '94 car I had before.
Edited the first time to see if his mirrors still worked.By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was miles worse than the '94 car I had before.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:05
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:13
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:20
Edited second time to see if his bushes were perished.
Edited the third time to check for water ingress (carpets are a bit niffy but I'll get away with that, the post stands)

Bomber Denton said:
macdeb said:
More miles, more bits likely to drop off. IF it has been held as a trophy car or cacooned, then that is the car I would buy rather than one that has been ragged to within an inch of it's life around a track week in, week out.
By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was miles worse than the '94 car I had before.
Edited the first time to see if his mirrors still worked.By the way, I did say PROPERLY looked after.
CONDITION! as said before. Please don't say that a high mileage owner wishes it had even more miles recorded as opposed to less.
PS; I have a very low mileage Chimaera at the moment of which I've had for two years. It is by far and away a much better car than either of my previous 'higher mileage' RV8 TVR's, one of which was the same age ['00] which incidently was miles worse than the '94 car I had before.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:05
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:13
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:20
Edited second time to see if his bushes were perished.
Edited the third time to check for water ingress (carpets are a bit niffy but I'll get away with that, the post stands)

tvrbob said:
macdeb said:
Err, likewise me old mate.
Mine isn't a high miler. What are you trying to sayedited to say 'will you stop editing your posts'
Edited by tvrbob on Friday 4th January 21:29
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:35
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
macdeb said:
Err, you know NOTHING of my intentions. Just trying to help someone seeking advice and not 'feathering my nest'. I SAID CONDITION, did I not? Grow up.
By the way you made the first questionable comment stating that people with high milers were posting wrongly. You started the debate so perhaps you should consider growing upEdited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:27
macdeb said:
tvrbob said:
macdeb said:
Err, likewise me old mate.
Mine isn't a high miler. What are you trying to sayedited to say 'will you stop editing your posts'
Edited by tvrbob on Friday 4th January 21:29
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:35
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
tvrbob said:
macdeb said:
tvrbob said:
macdeb said:
Err, likewise me old mate.
Mine isn't a high miler. What are you trying to sayedited to say 'will you stop editing your posts'
Edited by tvrbob on Friday 4th January 21:29
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:35
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:36
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:37
To the author, best of luck with your purchase mate, hope it's a good one.
Edited by macdeb on Friday 4th January 21:53
I am now the proud owner of 98 Chimaera500. Picked it up on Friday and wanted to go for a spin on Saturday but weather was bad. However today was sunny
Went for a good run, got some cushions for my other half and she had a drive too. Got the thumbs up from her so all is good. Can't wait for the real summer to arrive, even got a blast on the horn from a fellow TVR driver
Forgot to say, whilst other half had only been driving for 5mins she hit a pheasant, I was to say the least,distraught about the car, whilst she was distraught about the pheasant.
biper
Went for a good run, got some cushions for my other half and she had a drive too. Got the thumbs up from her so all is good. Can't wait for the real summer to arrive, even got a blast on the horn from a fellow TVR driver
Forgot to say, whilst other half had only been driving for 5mins she hit a pheasant, I was to say the least,distraught about the car, whilst she was distraught about the pheasant.
biper
Edited by biper on Sunday 20th April 15:50
Gassing Station | Chimaera | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


