why a chimp??
why a chimp??
Author
Discussion

clarkmagpie

Original Poster:

3,710 posts

226 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
why should i get a chimp and not a griff?

whats the pro's and cons?

the pros look like a lot newer car for your money
what else is there?!

why did you get yours??

cheers,
nick.

T_Pot

2,542 posts

228 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
OK, all the jokes aside, i really do think, its just down to personal taste between the two.

they are both pretty much the same design, slightly different dash, but not enough to worry about.

its just which one floats your boat really.

for me, i liked the chim a lot more than the griff, but if a griff had come up at the right price, i would have had one

clarkmagpie

Original Poster:

3,710 posts

226 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
ex 300zx owner T pot?
recognise the user name from somewhere!

much of an improvement over a mildly tuner 300zx tt?

Rum Runner

2,349 posts

248 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
1 Cheaper
2 Much bigger choice of cars to choose from , engine and volume of numbers made .
3. More practical .
4 . 500 Chim's are much rarer than Griff 500.
5 . I prefer the look of the back end of the Chim.

Aubrey

1,157 posts

227 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
As far as I can see the Chimaera seems to be a GT version of the Griff, It has a bigger boot, but apart from that they are fairly similar. But of course chims are better smile

At the end of the day it really is a matter of taste, they both have almost identical chassis and engines. Go and drive a few examples of each and see which you prefer.

Zippee

14,144 posts

265 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
From my point of view it simply boiled down to the fact I prefer the looks of the Chim, though I do wish now I'd bought a 450 or 500 as you do get used to a 400s power pretty quickly.

tvr5000

391 posts

261 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
Never went for the Griffs looks as they look too classic. The chimaera looks a more intersting shape to me and definately has a better rear. The Griff is too bland at the rear while the Chim has curves and dips that make it look more modern.
But its each to their own, and at the end of the day, its a TVR and you'll fall for it from day one. Good luck finding a good one.

T_Pot

2,542 posts

228 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
clarkmagpie said:
ex 300zx owner T pot?
recognise the user name from somewhere!

much of an improvement over a mildly tuner 300zx tt?
Thats me

L33

3,469 posts

255 months

Sunday 17th February 2008
quotequote all
For me, I actually prefer the shape of the Grief BUT there are so many more Chims around so finding a good one is easier and prices are much more friendly. You get a lot more car for your money with a Chim.

Apart from the looks, they are basically the same car under the bodyshell.

thumbup

zadumbreion

1,049 posts

251 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
How do you pronounce "Chim"

Is it like "CHIMney" or like "CHIMaera" ??? Or "Kim" ?

Edited by zadumbreion on Tuesday 19th February 11:28

T_Pot

2,542 posts

228 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
i thought it was like KAImaera ?

JonRB

80,124 posts

303 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
In the later cars (1997 onwards I think) they were the same car underneath, just different clothes.

The Chimaera is considered "softer" but in all honesty it comes down to personal taste.

We chose the Chimaera due to its cavernous boot which gives you great touring ability and better practicality, and we preferred the shape. But I'd probably been just as happy with a Griff I would imagine.

Aubrey

1,157 posts

227 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
T_Pot said:
i thought it was like KAImaera ?
This is correct for 'Chimaera', and just 'Chim' on its own pronounced as 'KIM'.

im

34,302 posts

248 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
Oh god...not again...

Can...meet Worms

Edited by im on Tuesday 19th February 11:57

thegman

1,928 posts

235 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
I pronounce it Chim as in Chimney. but i also say KAImera. Saying Kim just makes it sound like a girls car. Griff owners keep back.

Aubrey

1,157 posts

227 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
thegman said:
I pronounce it Chim as in Chimney. but i also say KAImera. Saying Kim just makes it sound like a girls car. Griff owners keep back.
Try telling Kimi Räikkönen that smile

900T-R

20,406 posts

288 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
For the earlier cars at least, the Chimaera's suspension tuning makes it a more useable car for real roads (although a lot of us will be upgrading the suspension with the help of one of the TVR specialists, so this may be a moot point). By the same token, all but the earliest Griffs are 5 litres and I don't think the style of its power delivery suits these cars at all. It's just too lairy to be useable IMO, all the power being squashed in a rather limited part of the rev range - past 5K rpm it's all over and done with.

That, and while I happily admit the Griff is a gorgeous and unprecedented (for TVR) design, for me the Chimaera and Cerbera moved the game on from that - the curves are just that bit more evocative and the rear end looks far better integrated, less sorry boxedin kit car-ish.

Don1

16,856 posts

239 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
Zippee said:
I do wish now I'd bought a 450 or 500 as you do get used to a 400s power pretty quickly.
Couldn't agree more (looks at piggy bank for the supercharger)

cloggy

4,959 posts

240 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
L33 said:
For me, I actually prefer the shape of the Grief
Grief :snigger:

5yearstobuyatvr

788 posts

250 months

Tuesday 19th February 2008
quotequote all
Seriously if youre after a chimp, try whipsnade zoo!