speedo question
speedo question
Author
Discussion

TJC46

Original Poster:

2,198 posts

232 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
Hi guys last year when doing my bodylift i managed to ever so slightly damage part of the electric cable on my speedo transducer. I thought i had managed to repair it. but my speedo does not work. Before i spend to buy a new one can someone tell me how close to the toothed wheel on the diff does the transducer have to be, Also i painted the diff and the toothed wheels would the paint affect it in anyway? Just want to be sure before splashing the cash, have you seen the censored price of one of these.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

265 months

Tuesday 9th March 2010
quotequote all
About thirty thou IIRC. The Steve Heath one will work with a greater clearance. It's easy enough to adjust the tangs of the rotor if you've bent them, don't ask how I know smash

shpub

8,507 posts

298 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
It's about 10 thou or even less. Depending on what paint you used, the coating thickness may be greater than that and the sensor won't work. My intelligent speed sensor will work with a gap of over 1mm and doesn't care about paint.


spend

12,581 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
Maybe Robs is on the nose of the diff (tang?) and those big teeth seem to be happy with a much greater clearance than the ABS sensors type on most of the cars.

Mines the original (hungarian IIRC) sensor Steve, and its fine at @3mm, hardly surprising the teeth+separation must be 10x as big as the abs wheel type. It's so good I have to switch it off occasionally to keep it calibrated to TVR mileage hehe

Simon Says

19,390 posts

247 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
spend said:
Maybe Robs is on the nose of the diff (tang?) and those big teeth seem to be happy with a much greater clearance than the ABS sensors type on most of the cars.

Mines the original (hungarian IIRC) sensor Steve, and its fine at @3mm, hardly surprising the teeth+separation must be 10x as big as the abs wheel type. It's so good I have to switch it off occasionally to keep it calibrated to TVR mileage hehe
Thats a heads up thought both types running clearance was vital wink was rqather hoping a quick adjust would fix mine(sometimes intermittent op)i have put up with it for over 2 years though laugh

spend

12,581 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
The heads up on those types is make sure the wiring is OK (and if the OP has one - that he corrected them the right way around) wink

BliarOut

72,863 posts

265 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
spend said:
Maybe Robs is on the nose of the diff (tang?) and those big teeth seem to be happy with a much greater clearance than the ABS sensors type on most of the cars.

Mines the original (hungarian IIRC) sensor Steve, and its fine at @3mm, hardly surprising the teeth+separation must be 10x as big as the abs wheel type. It's so good I have to switch it off occasionally to keep it calibrated to TVR mileage hehe
Got it in one biggrin

TVR Beaver

2,874 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
Isn't there an input into the ECU from this thing?.. If it's not working (for what ever reason) dosen't it impact on the ECU and what it thinks the car is doing?.. rolleyes

spend

12,581 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
TVR Beaver said:
Isn't there an input into the ECU from this thing?.. If it's not working (for what ever reason) dosen't it impact on the ECU and what it thinks the car is doing?.. rolleyes
You mean the extra complexity required because the T5 box has no speed sensor hehe Rarely mentioned when folks bleet on about T5's being better - just another tricky thing to go wrong really wink

TBH we can talk round all these differences til the cows come home, that's why its quite important that if posters want relevant responses they should actually put some details of their car on their profile!

shpub

8,507 posts

298 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
spend said:
Maybe Robs is on the nose of the diff (tang?) and those big teeth seem to be happy with a much greater clearance than the ABS sensors type on most of the cars.

Mines the original (hungarian IIRC) sensor Steve, and its fine at @3mm, hardly surprising the teeth+separation must be 10x as big as the abs wheel type. It's so good I have to switch it off occasionally to keep it calibrated to TVR mileage hehe
The original sensor is analogue and the output voltage is dependent on several factors such how much metal is being moved by the sensor, its speed and the gap between metal and sensor. One other factor is the mark space ratio. If this is too short... the sensor won't register it. For the diff drive shaft trigger wheels, the gap has to be around the 10 thou otherwise the sensor cannot differentiate the gaps etc. I can believe that with the bigger propshaft system, the gap can be more but 3mm is really pushing it for a small high frequency sensor which is what you need for the ABS wheel types. I suspect that it is a big diameter sensor such as a M16 or M18 type.

As for the callibration aspect, I am working on a calibration unit that allows you to recallibrate the speedo at any time without having to send it away. So if the speedo is out or you want to run different tyre/wheel combinations, the speedo can be corrected at the press of a button (or several presses in some cases).

spend

12,581 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
2 completely different designs really Steve (you used to have a 4.3 once upon a time didn't you - or was it pre-cat?).

The way the 'tangs' / 'teeth' are bent over on the 'crowned' wheel would make it very difficult to have the tolerances that you could get simply turning down an ABS toothed wheel. So I would guess they are designed to have a relatively large clearance, and yes from what I remember the sensor is quite large - none of those pin sized inductive ends IYSWIM. From experience I did close the gap when I rebuilt that area, and the speedo worked but was very jerky & seemed to 'ponder' at certain times, opening the gap back up made everything hunky dory again. (I only tried opening the gap - because like a numpty I rewired the sensor the wrong way round and got nothing! hehe - so I was trying anything..) All the time I spent trying to make sure all the teeth were 'set' perfectly was just character building wink

I have no doubt that the clearances / muck / alignment of the ABS type arrangements is much more critical (but in its favour it is a lot easier to access).

shpub

8,507 posts

298 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
Actually it's the same design but different implementations.

I spent a lot of time playing round with different sensors for the speedo unit and traction control and the sensor design is one big compromise. Big sensors support big sense gaps at the expence of resolution and switching frequency. Small sensors trade sense gap for resolution and switching speed. And then there are additional restrictions depending on the switching speed which is probably why moving the sensor out helped give a better resolution of the mark space ratio. If you look in detail at some of the sensor specs there are so pretty mind numbing factors to be taken into account.

PS never had a precat... went to a couple of 500s



Edited by shpub on Wednesday 10th March 13:44

spend

12,581 posts

277 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
shpub said:
Actually it's the same design but different implementations.

I spent a lot of time playing round with different sensors for the speedo unit and traction control and the sensor design is one big compromise. Big sensors support big sense gaps at the expense of resolution and switching frequency. Small sensors trade sense gap for resolution and switching speed.

PS never had a precat... went to a couple of 500s

I've always assumed that the speedos electrics were customized to see a particular waveform ie early ETB a nice wavy line & later CAI a choppy square form. That's what I was referring to 'by design' - from the gauge providers, who will have tested paired triggers+sensors, with just TVR implementing them to the providers specs?

The ABS sensor scenario has always made me curious - it seems the need the best granularity as the wheel approaches locking - ie calibrated to most sensitive as the signal tends to 0!

Sorry I had it in my mind you had had a 4.3 - but senility is approaching fast hehe

TVR Beaver

2,874 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
spend said:
TVR Beaver said:
Isn't there an input into the ECU from this thing?.. If it's not working (for what ever reason) dosen't it impact on the ECU and what it thinks the car is doing?.. rolleyes
You mean the extra complexity required because the T5 box has no speed sensor hehe Rarely mentioned when folks bleet on about T5's being better - just another tricky thing to go wrong really wink

TBH we can talk round all these differences til the cows come home, that's why its quite important that if posters want relevant responses they should actually put some details of their car on their profile!
So if you have the T5.. what happens to the ECU and it's performance if the sensor fails or may be a wire is broken?... Anyone know the end result?.. under / over fueling may be??

TJC46

Original Poster:

2,198 posts

232 months

Wednesday 10th March 2010
quotequote all
Managed to get the car up on the axle stands tonight, and although i have not measured the gap exactly, it looks to be about 2 to 3 mm. Will set it correctly this weekend and see if that sorts it. Thanks for the replies. Managed to reset the gap friday afternoon to slightly less than 10 thou, speedo now working perfectly. woohoo

Edited by TJC46 on Friday 12th March 18:04