First time Jag owner
First time Jag owner
Author
Discussion

sultanbrown

Original Poster:

5,740 posts

253 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
Just picked up a 3.0 V6 S type, T reg with 93k on the clock and FSH (mostly Jag) for £1600.
Always had a soft spot for Jags, but never saw myself owning one, not in the next 20 years anyway.wink
Really enjoying it. Friends and family can't believe how much car I've got for the money.

cloud9

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

232 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
£1600?....blimey.

Perhaps there's an upside to the current cost of petrol and threats of retrogressive increases in road tax, the ongoing road pricing debate, congestion charges based on engine size and the rantings of car-hating politicians and ecomentalists after all..

getmecoat

Enjoy.

vladman

250 posts

227 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
What a price! As Jag Steve said, that more than offsets the ridiculous price of petrol these days! Enjoy it, hope it serves you well! thumbup

mondayo

1,834 posts

285 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
The original shape S types are very cheap now. My Dad's mate has just traded in his old W reg 3 litre with 50,000 miles and full Jag service history for just 3 grand...and that was at jag to buy the new XF. And he'd never had any real problems with it!

sultanbrown

Original Poster:

5,740 posts

253 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
It was bought from my friend's brother in law who had already received his new car and just wanted to get rid, hence why it was so cheap.
Only bought it because it was cheap, but it's growing on me very quickly.
About the only downside to it is the fairly small boot, but then at least the seats fold.
Seems like the local ladies are quite impressed by it as well.party

ianwayne

7,641 posts

290 months

Sunday 25th May 2008
quotequote all
There's a lot of ignorance out there regarding VED (car tax) rates. If its registered before March 2001 (i.e. up to X reg), the max rate is £185 but going up to £200 in 2009. Only from Y reg on is it rated on emissions.

ianwayne

7,641 posts

290 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
Sorry, forgot to add, that sounds like an excellent buy. Enjoy!

sultanbrown

Original Poster:

5,740 posts

253 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
ianwayne said:
There's a lot of ignorance out there regarding VED (car tax) rates. If its registered before March 2001 (i.e. up to X reg), the max rate is £185 but going up to £200 in 2009. Only from Y reg on is it rated on emissions.
Yes, that's why I park my (2000 plate) M5 next to my MD's Civic Type R. hehe

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

232 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
ianwayne said:
There's a lot of ignorance out there regarding VED (car tax) rates. If its registered before March 2001 (i.e. up to X reg), the max rate is £185 but going up to £200 in 2009. Only from Y reg on is it rated on emissions.
At the moment that's correct... would you trust the government not to change the rules again 'tho?

Pasco

6,652 posts

250 months

Monday 26th May 2008
quotequote all
So what can i expect to pay, road tax wise, for my 53 plate S type 3.0 SE then ?

First time Jag owner also smile

vladman

250 posts

227 months

Tuesday 27th May 2008
quotequote all
sorry to possibly derail this topic, but i remain confused about all these new bands and tax too.

what should i be paying in 2009 and 2010 for my S-type R (1st registered in sept 2002)? according to some sites, i should start paying 400 and something pounds from next year, but according to others, it sounds like i wont get affected by that until 2010, because of some clause about cars registered before march 2006?

totally confused. ???

a8hex

5,832 posts

245 months

Tuesday 27th May 2008
quotequote all
vladman said:
sorry to possibly derail this topic, but i remain confused about all these new bands and tax too.

what should i be paying in 2009 and 2010 for my S-type R (1st registered in sept 2002)? according to some sites, i should start paying 400 and something pounds from next year, but according to others, it sounds like i wont get affected by that until 2010, because of some clause about cars registered before march 2006?

totally confused. ???
Sounds like Gordon and his mates are also confused. I'm not sure they written the law yet but the plan was to start fleecing people ASAP, but a number of MPs are not happy, they got a little bit scared they'll be out on their arses soon and are starting to have second thoughts about mugging second hand car drivers. According to the news even some environmentalist aren't too happy with the proposal.

Pasco

6,652 posts

250 months

Tuesday 27th May 2008
quotequote all
vladman said:
sorry to possibly derail this topic, but i remain confused about all these new bands and tax too.

what should i be paying in 2009 and 2010 for my S-type R (1st registered in sept 2002)? according to some sites, i should start paying 400 and something pounds from next year, but according to others, it sounds like i wont get affected by that until 2010, because of some clause about cars registered before march 2006?

totally confused. ???
+1

rolleyes This so called government deserve the land slide defeat they are heading towards the wrs !!

Edited by Pasco on Tuesday 27th May 20:40

The Leaper

5,463 posts

228 months

Tuesday 27th May 2008
quotequote all
V,

According to Parker's, you and I (me for my 4.2 V8 SE) and others will be paying the following

From April 2008 £210
2009 £300
2010 £455

and from then on, whatever the government skins us for.

Another case of retrospective legislation. This govenment has over spent, over taxed, over indulged. I think it's on the way out. No wonder, as per the BBC today, a good number of Labour MPs are seriously worried.

Tax the motorist on environmental grounds is OK; spend the revenue raised where though?

Sorry, a grumpy old.....

R.

vladman

250 posts

227 months

Wednesday 28th May 2008
quotequote all
Leaper, thanks.

My tax disc expires end of September. So are you saying I'll still pay "only" £210, until end of September 2009? And then £300? If that's correct, and they don't change anything yet again (for better or worse) than that's better than what I've been thinking...

The Leaper

5,463 posts

228 months

Wednesday 28th May 2008
quotequote all
V,

I do not know the answer, sorry. I hope that if you renew from 10/08 as in your case then you pay the annual rate at that time, but I can see you being charged proportionately from 10/08 to 03/09 and then 04/09 to 09/09. My tax renews at the end of 06/08 so I'll renew on an annual basis and see what happens. I'll let you know unless another PHer comes on here with the answer to your question.

R.

diesel piston

287 posts

236 months