Tame technician help!
Author
Discussion

Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
I'm looking at buying an A4 avant 2002-2005 vintage.

Ideally the 1.9TDI 130.

Saying that the 2.0FSI's and 1.8T are miles cheaper.

Are the petrols reliable?

Many many thanks!

Dr G

16,005 posts

273 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
1.9 TDI 130 good.

Often run by cheapskates as they've a reputation for being cheap to run.

2.0 FSI bad.

No power, no economy, no point.

1.8T good.

Older engine but well proven and usually only prone to relatively minor electrical issues. Regular oil changes crucial.

Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
Dr G said:
1.9 TDI 130 good.

Often run by cheapskates as they've a reputation for being cheap to run.

2.0 FSI bad.

No power, no economy, no point.

1.8T good.

Older engine but well proven and usually only prone to relatively minor electrical issues. Regular oil changes crucial.
Thanks for this. What is crucial for me is reliability which is why the PD130 is of interest however most are priced around the £3k mark. I've seen a good 1.8T advertise for £1,600 with FASH and belt change. Economy is dire though!

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
As Dr G really

2.0fsi crap

1.8T is ok, if I was going to run one, i would remove the sump and replace / remove the oil pump pick up strainer, these can get blocked and starve the engine of oil. Regular oil changes reduce the risk of this, but faulty PVC valves can bring it on even on well cared for cars.

1.9 is the pick of the bunch, but as with all car of the modern era, you do have variable vain turbos that can carbon up and stick, same can be said for EGR valves. A good thrash once fully up to temp once a week should keep this from happening.


Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
Tame Technician said:
As Dr G really

2.0fsi crap
Do you mean crap as in unreliable or just generally crap for the performance/running costs?

The Mpg looks ok and they're dirt cheap. The 1.9TDI is definitely what I'd go for but they are expensive for age/miles. 1.9TDI quattro is what I really fancy but they can easily fetch £4,000!

Danger

91 posts

271 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
Does the 2.0TFSI being crap include the new S3?

SmithyAG

300 posts

159 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
Nope. They mean the 2.0FSI - I.e non turbo.

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd September 2014
quotequote all
2.0 F S I (normally aspirated)

Performance crap

ecconomy crap.
ETA
"unless you are on a run, constant at very light engine load (probbably 55mph) then it good, but in any other driving senario you wont get near the quoted figured"

The way the engine works and runs crap, (feels and sounds rough, bad throttle mapping, engine stutters as it changes modes)

Reliability crap

Early ones tended to melt the valves in the head, would now effectivly right off the car.

They all leak oil.

Lots of sensor issues that will put the engine light on.

Seariously one of my colleuges runs one (53 plate A3), because it cost less than £500 through the trade. So Yes they are cheap, and yes he's has not had a problem in a few months.

SO as I always say if you want one, dont beleive what you read on the internet, get one. Just go in eyes wide open. Get the newest lowest milage one you can afford, if you can find one with one elderly owner, detailed service history and its had a cylinder head, an NOx sensor, egr valve, cambelt and the coil recall recently, thats the one you want.




Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Thursday 4th September 2014
quotequote all
1.9 TDi it is then!

Does a 200,000 miles '03 Avant with FSH for £1k sound a remotely good idea?

shtu

4,606 posts

177 months

Thursday 4th September 2014
quotequote all
Leicesterdave said:
Economy is dire though!
Sit down, and work out properly how many more miles you will have to travel to cover the extra £££ cost of buying a diesel car over a petrol one. You WILL be surprised.

Don't obsess about "mpg=running cost", it's nowhere as near clear-cut as it was a decade ago, when diesel was - gasp - miles cheaper than petrol.

Dr G

16,005 posts

273 months

Thursday 4th September 2014
quotequote all
Leicesterdave said:
1.9 TDi it is then!

Does a 200,000 miles '03 Avant with FSH for £1k sound a remotely good idea?
Buy the best you can afford.

At 200,000 miles it might be cheap because it's at the end of its useful life. Has the most recent owner run it into the ground and sold it because there's 5 minutes left on the MOT?

Could be great and well maintained but you'd need to see it and look very carefully.

Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Thursday 4th September 2014
quotequote all
Dr G said:
Buy the best you can afford.

At 200,000 miles it might be cheap because it's at the end of its useful life. Has the most recent owner run it into the ground and sold it because there's 5 minutes left on the MOT?

Could be great and well maintained but you'd need to see it and look very carefully.
I hear you but most have done about 150,000 miles!

Dr G

16,005 posts

273 months

Thursday 4th September 2014
quotequote all
So hard to comment on a 10 year old car without seeing it in the metal and driving it.

If the 200k car has been cherished, properly maintained and driven with mechanical sympathy it will be a million times nicer than one with half the mileage run on a shoestring.

Encantada

4,379 posts

284 months

Friday 5th September 2014
quotequote all
My old B4 80TDI had 255k on the clock when I sold it, the guy who bought it, the towed a caravan around Spain for another 4000 miles, sent back lots of pics, said how happy he was with the car.
So, moral is, mileage not necessarily important, condition and servicing absolutely.

Kevin.

oldaudi

1,652 posts

189 months

Friday 5th September 2014
quotequote all
Ive got the 2.0 FSI Non Turbo. Performance is poor, economy isnt that bad but then I sit doing 60 on the motorway. You have to work it hard to get any type of performance from it and then that ruins the economy by half. Its out of breath really quickly and needed a 6th gear in my view. I can do 400 miles from £50, which is exactly my weeks worth of miles

Id look at a different engine. Ive got one cause it was cheap, suits me for my trip to work and I knew the previous owner well.

160K miles, a few bulbs and usual service stuff every 10K miles is all its asked for apart from:

New Fuel Pump
Frozen brake caliper
Leaky rocker cover gasket
Coolant leak
Engine Light comes on (until I clear it every 60 miles) reporting faulty sensors regarding Coolant Temp Sensor at Radiator Outlet or something. Annoying

But then its 13 years old


Edited by oldaudi on Friday 5th September 14:29


Edited by oldaudi on Friday 5th September 14:32


Edited by oldaudi on Friday 5th September 14:34

Leicesterdave

Original Poster:

2,288 posts

211 months

Saturday 6th September 2014
quotequote all
Are any of the A3 8P's any good?

what the 2.0 TDI like? Is the 1.9 Still a PD in the early 8P's?