Mk1 TT - 1.8T or 3.2?
Author
Discussion

DaveyBoyWonder

Original Poster:

3,933 posts

204 months

Tuesday 28th April 2020
quotequote all
Hi all.
After lockdown is over, depending on my work situation I hopefully won't be going back to commuting via train 5 days a week and instead be doing 2 maybe 3 days max and definitely won't be subjecting myself to the trains again so will need a cheapish commuter. The more I look at mk1 TTs the more I want one and with what seems like a reasonably sensible budget of £3k, there are loads.

I'm not overly fussed between manual and DSG, neither the 1.8T 225 or 3.2. I think in an ideal world I'd get a 3.2 DSG coupe of which there are a few around for sub £3k but am I opening myself up for a world of potential bork with a DSG TT for under £3k? In my head a 1.8T manual would be a load cheaper and easier to fix if it needed anything major like gearbox work?

Whats the consensus??

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,033 posts

265 months

Tuesday 28th April 2020
quotequote all
I suppose for a car of that age it will all be down to the particular car? Presume though the DSG has more potential to be troublesome.

At that budget will they be 15-20 years old?

martin mrt

3,883 posts

231 months

Tuesday 28th April 2020
quotequote all
Mrs MRT owned a 3.2 TT some years ago, DSG and she loved it. The DSG played up and was sold as it was, after leaving her in the middle of a DC whilst crossing it with no drive. Never drove it again and won’t have anything DSG.

I had a 225 1.8t roadster, last year that I bought for peanuts. It was woeful, the drivetrain was fine but everything else around it was borked

A 3.2 or 225 1.8t coupe with a manual box, that would be great

citizen smith

815 posts

211 months

Tuesday 28th April 2020
quotequote all
I've had both in manual formats. So, the 1.8 225 is cheaper to run (mpg) and the repairs will cost a lot less. Timing chain replacements are a major cost - £500 ish for the 1.8 and £1k ish for the 3.2.

The 3.2 looks better with different aero package and it feels more relaxed when motoring. For commuter driving the DSG is better, but that's it.

For a £3k budget, you would be better off searching for a well maintained 1.8 225. The insurance might also be cheaper for the 1.8.

The choice is yours, but buy carefully and you can save a lot of money long term.

DaveyBoyWonder

Original Poster:

3,933 posts

204 months

Wednesday 29th April 2020
quotequote all
Cheers all.

Sounds like what my head was saying is the right option then, trying to find a well looked after 1.8T 225. Wonder if I can find a nogaro blue one now smile

Cupra Black

3,088 posts

248 months

Wednesday 29th April 2020
quotequote all
Never driven a TT but I do have an R32 with the same engine.

Its a great engine, probably more relaxed and sounds awesome but its slow. I guess the TT will be a little lighter and I suppose it depends on what you are looking for. MPG in the R32 is crap and expect 20-25mpg.

Probably best to drive both. Personally I would get a 225 and modify it.

irocfan

48,995 posts

220 months

Wednesday 29th April 2020
quotequote all
I used to have a 225 with a 'worx' exhaust and (allegedly) remapped, both by previous owner. TBH it was ok but really didn't feel fast and the interior, whilst nice, felt like a dungeon. I honestly preferred my Crossfire (dons flame suit)

stevemcs

10,340 posts

123 months

Wednesday 29th April 2020
quotequote all
We had a Mk1 TT Roadster for 9 years, personally i would go with the 1.8, yes the 3.2 sounds nicer but the 1.8 will be cheaper to run and can be made to go faster for less. However i would pick a Z4 over a TT anyday.