How many?
Author
Discussion

LordGrover

Original Poster:

34,162 posts

241 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
I don't frequent here as much as I did so apologies if this is a repost.

Interesting site lists how many Griffs (and any other cars) are on the road: click.


I see there was one first time, new registration last year...

davep

1,157 posts

313 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
Wow! Only half-a-dozen J reg pre-cats left, in the UK anyway. Mine was first registered June '92.

When are you coming back to the mad-house LG?


LordGrover

Original Poster:

34,162 posts

241 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
TBH I'm not sure of the validity of it, only 6 1992 Griffs taxed or SORNed in 2010? I know every one of those personally if that's right. hehe


gizzer

671 posts

235 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
TBH I'm not sure of the validity of it, only 6 1992 Griffs taxed or SORNed in 2010? I know every one of those personally if that's right. hehe
Hi my 4.3 reg sept 1992 and taxed hehe

C15

350 posts

272 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
A new reg in 2010??

Ant.

5,254 posts

310 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
The numbers for '92 cars seem low, look around at tje growl there are loads of j plates.....

davep

1,157 posts

313 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
TBH I'm not sure of the validity of it, only 6 1992 Griffs taxed or SORNed in 2010? I know every one of those personally if that's right. hehe
I think so too, since there are 11 '92 registered pre-cats in the PH Classifieds alone.

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
I've had quite a look at these figures and the numbers of licenced and SORN vehicles do seem to be roughly proportionally constant. There will be quite a few cars of all types missing due to V5 having a blank in the 'model name' field so that will account for quite a few.

If we look at numbers of new registrations from 2001 in the same data we can see that they don't correspond with 'official figures' quoted in books & from 'official TVR sources'

For example some figures I have for 2001/2002 production of Griffs from a TVR source claims 146 built, whereas the new registrations for the same period and after only total 94 (including the late comers) even if we're very generous and say that one quarter of the ones listed as 'missing' i.e. no name in the model field on the V5(which total 82) say 20 are Griffs that still falls short of the claimed production numbers by 32!!

So I think the biggest thing we can draw from this is that TVR never told the real truth about how many cars they built and indeed they actually produced less than they claimed.

LordGrover

Original Poster:

34,162 posts

241 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
... or DVLA are as useless as we all thought they were. hehe

Mr MoJo

4,698 posts

245 months

Monday 20th June 2011
quotequote all
Probably spot on there LG hehe

The number of cars listed as being reg'd in the last 7 years is confusing too. The last of the SE cars, afaik, were registered in 2003.

gizzer

671 posts

235 months

Tuesday 21st June 2011
quotequote all
So I think the biggest thing we can draw from this is that TVR never told the real truth about how many cars they built and indeed they actually produced less than they claimed.



I,m sure you are dead right, more cars so called built means more money from the stocking plan finance agreement when the finance people came to check, the so called extra cars!!!!
were all on road test !!!!!

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st June 2011
quotequote all
gizzer said:
V8 GRF said:
So I think the biggest thing we can draw from this is that TVR never told the real truth about how many cars they built and indeed they actually produced less than they claimed.
I,m sure you are dead right, more cars so called built means more money from the stocking plan finance agreement when the finance people came to check, the so called extra cars!!!!
were all on road test !!!!!
yes for example I have stories on good authority that cars where moved round from the front to the rear of the production area during inspections as one trick. That's also why there is so much confusion over cars like the T440/Typhon and SP12 Cerbs as the same cars were regularily resprayed and re-registered and then they 'forgot' wink to record the change.

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Tuesday 21st June 2011
quotequote all
Mr MoJo said:
Probably spot on there LG hehe

The number of cars listed as being reg'd in the last 7 years is confusing too. The last of the SE cars, afaik, were registered in 2003.
I'd trust DVLA figures rather than TVR ones, that said where do the DVLA get their new registration numbers from? The manufacturer.......?

2003 is probably correct for a dealer registered/sold car but either last year or the year before Paul Calland and I were told by a lady at teh NEC Classic show that they had a Griffith in a barn at home that was brand new and unregistered!!! She was somewhat surprised that we were horrified rather than impressed, so it is possible that people have cars squirreled away that are still unknown.