Which are the best Rover V8 Cylinder Heads for a 5.0ltr?
Which are the best Rover V8 Cylinder Heads for a 5.0ltr?
Author
Discussion

MPoxon

Original Poster:

5,329 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Morning gents,

I am considering a top end engine refresh later on this year which will consist of big valve cylinder heads, a new cam and a RR mapping session. I know of the Wildcat and Merlin heads which get great write-ups but as I understand it these will not accept standard Rover rocker covers and standard exhaust manifolds, I therefore which to stick with the original Rover castings.

I know the likes of JE, V8D, RPI etc offer various different specifications of cylinder heads. What peoples opinions of which heads are best for an N/A 5.0ltr engine?

Matthew

hiltonig

3,153 posts

232 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
I would just go v8 dev heads, I looked at wildcat but manifolds won't fit , and they flow so much they r more suited for a track car. Never seen any results for the real steel heads yet ?

V8 GRF

7,298 posts

234 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
No one in the TVR world (as far as I know) has used these but they look like a good option.

An Australian tuning company has used them to good effect on their engines I believe.


carsy

3,019 posts

189 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Is there any gain to be had over the TVR 500 Heads ?

hiltonig

3,153 posts

232 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Not when you see the price of the above heads biggrin

V8 GRF

7,298 posts

234 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
carsy said:
Is there any gain to be had over the TVR 500 Heads ?
I think the flow rates are significantly higher

carsy

3,019 posts

189 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
I was thinking more in comparison to V8D or JE heads.

MPoxon

Original Poster:

5,329 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
carsy said:
I was thinking more in comparison to V8D or JE heads.
According to a few people in the trade I have spoken to about this the very early 5.0 cars had the same Big Valve heads as were fitted to the very rare and desirable 4.3BV and 4.5BV precat Griffs. Apparently most of the 500s however to not have TVR Big Valve heads they have a less free flowing version known as TVR500 heads.

I do not know how the TVR factory Big Valve and 500 heads compare to the current offerings from V8D, JE & RPI. I am hoping to be enlightened.



spend

12,581 posts

275 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
MPoxon said:
According to a few people in the trade I have spoken to about this the very early 5.0 cars had the same Big Valve heads as were fitted to the very rare and desirable 4.3BV and 4.5BV precat Griffs. Apparently most of the 500s however to not have TVR Big Valve heads they have a less free flowing version known as TVR500 heads.

I do not know how the TVR factory Big Valve and 500 heads compare to the current offerings from V8D, JE & RPI. I am hoping to be enlightened.
They all use the same valves (at least TVR BV/500 ones anyway), just the guides & porting differ in subtle areas (apart from the obvious rings in the eraly heads).

Does it really matter, the combination of how / when your piston shifts air + cam + valves + induction + exhaust + porting is the combination that matters most. Thats where chatting with someone like Rob to get a 'recipe' is the best option IMHO. Too many times the 'menus' offered are restrictive or may be suitable for cars with different capacaties, suited to what the seller has already.... It's not like you can assemble an eclectic collection of parts and they will all work together perfectly IYSWIM.

cavebloke

650 posts

251 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Does anyone make direct copies of the original TVR BV heads then? I have wondered about upgrading my 4.3 to BV spec but I thought you could do this by using the heads off any 500.

MPoxon

Original Poster:

5,329 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
spend said:
They all use the same valves (at least TVR BV/500 ones anyway), just the guides & porting differ in subtle areas (apart from the obvious rings in the eraly heads).

Does it really matter, the combination of how / when your piston shifts air + cam + valves + induction + exhaust + porting is the combination that matters most. Thats where chatting with someone like Rob to get a 'recipe' is the best option IMHO. Too many times the 'menus' offered are restrictive or may be suitable for cars with different capacaties, suited to what the seller has already.... It's not like you can assemble an eclectic collection of parts and they will all work together perfectly IYSWIM.
Very sound advice sir. I will engage with the various suppliers and see what they recommend as a cam, heads & ECU package.

MPoxon

Original Poster:

5,329 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
cavebloke said:
Does anyone make direct copies of the original TVR BV heads then? I have wondered about upgrading my 4.3 to BV spec but I thought you could do this by using the heads off any 500.
Did the 4.3BV not also have a wilder cam as well as improved heads?

Chilliman

12,306 posts

185 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
spend said:
MPoxon said:
According to a few people in the trade I have spoken to about this the very early 5.0 cars had the same Big Valve heads as were fitted to the very rare and desirable 4.3BV and 4.5BV precat Griffs. Apparently most of the 500s however to not have TVR Big Valve heads they have a less free flowing version known as TVR500 heads.

I do not know how the TVR factory Big Valve and 500 heads compare to the current offerings from V8D, JE & RPI. I am hoping to be enlightened.
They all use the same valves (at least TVR BV/500 ones anyway), just the guides & porting differ in subtle areas (apart from the obvious rings in the eraly heads).

Does it really matter, the combination of how / when your piston shifts air + cam + valves + induction + exhaust + porting is the combination that matters most. Thats where chatting with someone like Rob to get a 'recipe' is the best option IMHO.

Too many times the 'menus' offered are restrictive or may be suitable for cars with different capacaties, suited to what the
seller has already.... It's not like you can assemble an eclectic collection of parts and they will all work together perfectly
IYSWIM.
Totally agree. I believe in the case of my engine that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts because each added or modified component is their because it works so well with all the other parts, which is to say it was well thought out. The
bottom end is very strong and the addition of forged pistons allowed a higher than standard compression ratio, which, I imagine went into the consideration for the cam profile, along with the high flow injectors and the head modifications which included bulleted guides and reshaping of the ports along with matching these with the inlet manifold etc. Basically the engine was built to a target and not to a budget, which, although an expensive exercise is IMHO probably cheaper in the long run than 'bolting' on goodies which ultimately may never quite be right for each other.

Phew

cavebloke

650 posts

251 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
MPoxon said:
Did the 4.3BV not also have a wilder cam as well as improved heads?
Not sure but my car needs the cam doing really so I'd be keen to see the spec of that too if they exist anywhere. The "Bible" is quite vague in that area.

carsy

3,019 posts

189 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Pretty sure the 4.3BV had a Kent 234.

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

203 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
carsy said:
Pretty sure the 4.3BV had a Kent 234.
I doubt that, that's a race cam

Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

203 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Simon says said:
ince when Alex? the 234's powerband is far to soft to be Race territory confused Everyday is a school day as they say Spend,interesting stuff about the 4.3BV heads Vs 500 comparison scratchchin Alex,how you getting on with that Yankee bent 8?
The yank V8 is going to get done slowly, I wont lie! est drop in date - Christmas

Are we talking about the same cam?

http://www.kentcams.com/product-details/211/Camsha...


Alexdaredevilz

5,697 posts

203 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Mines a 300 duration cam and very close to the 404

FlipFlopGriff

7,144 posts

271 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
carsy said:
Pretty sure the 4.3BV had a Kent 234.
435 cam according to Dom at the last rebuild of the BV.
FFG

SILICONEKID340HP

14,997 posts

255 months

Tuesday 6th March 2012
quotequote all
Is my stealth cam a bit tame ? scratchchin