Weight saving dash
Weight saving dash
Author
Discussion

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Thursday 16th January 2014
quotequote all
A photo of my new lightweight dash. The carbon approach was going to be very costly just to be pretty so I just used 2 layers of Matt strand fibreglass to see how light I could get it. The finish has Matt strand exposed rather than smooth so this should avoid reflections on the screen. The original dash was 5.3kg. The new one is 1.2kg. Almost 80% lighter! I have even swapped the steel fixing bolts for alloy as they also weigh 60% less. It's not going to win concourse prizes though.

macdeb

8,752 posts

283 months

Thursday 16th January 2014
quotequote all
scratchchin Really?

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Thursday 16th January 2014
quotequote all
Good point well made. I did toy with spray filler and sanding to make it smooth but that would add another kilo which defeats the object

ChilliWhizz

12,365 posts

189 months

Friday 17th January 2014
quotequote all
Is this part of a car-wide weight reduction campaign or just a lightweight dash fetish? wink

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Friday 17th January 2014
quotequote all
obviously i have a fetish - who doesn't! but for the car its overall weight reduction. I am targetting 950kg dry but not sure it is achievable. the trouble was that the full roll cage added alot of weight. The next on the list is the boot. It already has a lightweight vented bonnet, no interior trim, lightened roof, plastic side windows etc etc. a couple of photos below


Edited by jesfirth on Friday 17th January 18:12


Edited by jesfirth on Friday 17th January 18:14

Bluebottle

3,498 posts

268 months

Friday 17th January 2014
quotequote all
that diffuser and rear wing look like they extend beyond the plan silhouette of the car, do you not have that restriction in sprint/hill climb then?

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Friday 17th January 2014
quotequote all
In the TVR speed champ and the CMSC we can do anything we want within reason. A full on rear wing is not allowed though. We are handicapped on power to weight ratio. Just looked at your profile I love your car, fancy a swap ?

Edited by jesfirth on Friday 17th January 21:05

panic

817 posts

311 months

Tuesday 21st January 2014
quotequote all
jesfirth said:
obviously i have a fetish - who doesn't! but for the car its overall weight reduction. I am targetting 950kg dry but not sure it is achievable.
It is.

Click on pic to watch...




V8 GRF

7,299 posts

238 months

Tuesday 21st January 2014
quotequote all
Do you have to run with the roof on?

If not why not get one of Steve Edwards' hard rear roof sections to replace the collapsible hoop and hood and then remove that when running, that should lose a fair bit of weight. It will fit the Griffith but the rear section won't go in the boot.

Steve's website is HERE

K4TRV

1,819 posts

280 months

Tuesday 21st January 2014
quotequote all
V8 GRF said:
Do you have to run with the roof on?

If not why not get one of Steve Edwards' hard rear roof sections to replace the collapsible hoop and hood and then remove that when running, that should lose a fair bit of weight. It will fit the Griffith but the rear section won't go in the boot.

Steve's website is HERE
^^ +1 ^^ If you are really serious in looking to reduce your weight (the car, silly!!), then the roof and more importantely the front end serves little in rigidity, but is seriously heavy?

See here: http://www.neilgarner-motorsport.com/Cars/TVR-Chim...

Neil has carved the front end off and replaced with a one-piece fibre jobby - I "think" he is sub - 900 kgs??? Have a chat, I would recommend?

Start saving Jez whistle

Trev

FlipFlopGriff

7,144 posts

275 months

Tuesday 21st January 2014
quotequote all
How much does all the gubbins (frame, motor etc) in the doors weigh and the glass? Maybe a fixed polycarbonate section if its allowable?
The surrey roof weighs about 10kg less than the standard panel if you need to keep the roof section but it ain't cheap - Roger has some prototypes he may do you a deal on if aesthetics aren't an issue.
FFG

DarkMatter

1,503 posts

259 months

Tuesday 21st January 2014
quotequote all
V8 GRF said:
Do you have to run with the roof on?

If not why not get one of Steve Edwards' hard rear roof sections to replace the collapsible hoop and hood and then remove that when running, that should lose a fair bit of weight. It will fit the Griffith but the rear section won't go in the boot.

Steve's website is HERE
You don't have to run with the roof on, but I think that it is more aerodynamically efficient. I spoke to Steve Edwards a couple of years ago and he said he would be prepared to make a lightweight (i.e. thin) one piece hard top to fit a Griff - I reckon that would save a few kgs.

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
DarkMatter said:
You don't have to run with the roof on, but I think that it is more aerodynamically efficient. I spoke to Steve Edwards a couple of years ago and he said he would be prepared to make a lightweight (i.e. thin) one piece hard top to fit a Griff - I reckon that would save a few kgs.
I reckon that there is little or no aero difference up to about 70mph. Above that it makes a big difference. Matt in his LS griff was at good wood and "lost" his roof one a run and then had to drive al fresco on the runs after that. I recall that it took about 4 mph off his 150mph top speed,

My roof is split into 2 for ease of use but already has the inner panels removed so it only weighs 7kg. You could probably get a carbon one down to about 3 or 4 kg though.

jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Wednesday 22nd January 2014
quotequote all
panic said:
It is.

Click on pic to watch...

Trev. Love it especially the screen. Might be a bit damp and chilly on the M25 heading for North Weald though. (-:

leerdam23

606 posts

289 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
jesfirth said:
DarkMatter said:
You don't have to run with the roof on, but I think that it is more aerodynamically efficient. I spoke to Steve Edwards a couple of years ago and he said he would be prepared to make a lightweight (i.e. thin) one piece hard top to fit a Griff - I reckon that would save a few kgs.
I reckon that there is little or no aero difference up to about 70mph. Above that it makes a big difference. Matt in his LS griff was at good wood and "lost" his roof one a run and then had to drive al fresco on the runs after that. I recall that it took about 4 mph off his 150mph top speed,

My roof is split into 2 for ease of use but already has the inner panels removed so it only weighs 7kg. You could probably get a carbon one down to about 3 or 4 kg though.
Yep, Drag racing the Griff, I was consistently quicker with the roof on.

wadsapple

3,346 posts

215 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
jesfirth said:
A photo of my new lightweight dash. The carbon approach was going to be very costly just to be pretty so I just used 2 layers of Matt strand fibreglass to see how light I could get it. The finish has Matt strand exposed rather than smooth so this should avoid reflections on the screen. The original dash was 5.3kg. The new one is 1.2kg. Almost 80% lighter! I have even swapped the steel fixing bolts for alloy as they also weigh 60% less. It's not going to win concourse prizes though.
Hi Jes

Not wishing to teach a grand mother about eggs so to speak. When I'm doing stuff in fibre glass and don't want a shiny smooth finish but want it smoother than chopped strand I use fibre glass surface tissue sheet to finish off. It just lays over the last layer and smooth's the surface out considerably See here....

http://www.cfsnet.co.uk/acatalog/CFS_Catalogue__Su...




jesfirth

Original Poster:

1,743 posts

270 months

Thursday 23rd January 2014
quotequote all
Perry thanks. I will use that on the next non shiny part I make