Carbon Fibre Plenums..... worth the money?
Discussion
Afternoon,
I have been looking at potential upgrades for my Griff and have made the decision to simply improve on what I have without modifying the engine for the time being.
The obvious start for this is 72" Plenum, CF trumpets, heat insulator & ACT smooth bore hoses.
I have seen a number of cars with Carbon Fibre Plenums recently. Purely from an aesthetical point of view I think they look absolutely fantastic. Does anyone have any experience with these and what benefits do you get over the standard 72" & CF trumpet modification?
V8D Single Throttle Plenum

ACT Twin Throttle Plenum

ACT Tripple Throttle Plenum

Matthew
I have been looking at potential upgrades for my Griff and have made the decision to simply improve on what I have without modifying the engine for the time being.
The obvious start for this is 72" Plenum, CF trumpets, heat insulator & ACT smooth bore hoses.
I have seen a number of cars with Carbon Fibre Plenums recently. Purely from an aesthetical point of view I think they look absolutely fantastic. Does anyone have any experience with these and what benefits do you get over the standard 72" & CF trumpet modification?
V8D Single Throttle Plenum

ACT Twin Throttle Plenum
ACT Tripple Throttle Plenum
Matthew
MPoxon said:
Does anyone have any experience with these and what benefits do you get over the standard 72" & CF trumpet modification?
From memory for a standard engine you'd hardly see any benefit, ie too small a difference to measure and even for a tuned engine it would have to be very highly tuned for the triple plenum to be of a benefit. Spend seems to recall a little differently though. Maybe the designs have been revised. If I were you I'd have a chat to Tim directly.Mine has the triple, although a previous version looking at the current one as mine isn't quite as blingy 
I can't give you a before and after comparison sadly but I can say that the throttle response is hilariously good. This may be partly a pre-cat party trick compared to my 500 in fairness.
Hmm, not sure that helps really

I can't give you a before and after comparison sadly but I can say that the throttle response is hilariously good. This may be partly a pre-cat party trick compared to my 500 in fairness.
Hmm, not sure that helps really

900T-R said:
Same here with the twin - great throttle response making a sensibly specced/built 4.x litre engine feel more like an AJP/S6 but with the right sort of noise and low down urge. The carbon fibre shaves a kg or two from the top of the engine assembly too which can't be bad... 
That is good to know - thanks. I do not really rate the throttle response on mine, I find the pick up very sluggish unless in the correct gear. It may be worth the investment on the grounds of throttle response in that case.
JamesK said:
Mine has the triple, although a previous version looking at the current one as mine isn't quite as blingy 
I can't give you a before and after comparison sadly but I can say that the throttle response is hilariously good. This may be partly a pre-cat party trick compared to my 500 in fairness.
Hmm, not sure that helps really
That must be the Holly Grail of throttle response 4.5BV + triple plenum!
I can't give you a before and after comparison sadly but I can say that the throttle response is hilariously good. This may be partly a pre-cat party trick compared to my 500 in fairness.
Hmm, not sure that helps really

SILICONE KID said:
You can get a 72mm plenum,45mm trumpet base with short flared aluminuim trumpets and a port matched inet manifold for £450. plus a insultor gasket for £17.50.would that improve a 4l and 4.5.
I did look at the option of replacing the inlet manifold and trumpet base for port matched versions however I understand that to remove and replace the inlet manifold is quite a big job as which will disturb oil and fuel waterways and could even take a TVR specialist up to 5 hours labour. For this reason I was potentially looking at a multi-throttle carbon plenum to maximize the potential of the existing inlet manifold. You mention that your suggestion would improve a 4l and 4.5l, what would you recommend for a 5l?
MPoxon said:
I did look at the option of replacing the inlet manifold and trumpet base for port matched versions however I understand that to remove and replace the inlet manifold is quite a big job as which will disturb oil and fuel waterways and could even take a TVR specialist up to 5 hours labour. For this reason I was potentially looking at a multi-throttle carbon plenum to maximize the potential of the existing inlet manifold.
You mention that your suggestion would improve a 4l and 4.5l, what would you recommend for a 5l?
Off you go then Daz ! Megasquirt ? You mention that your suggestion would improve a 4l and 4.5l, what would you recommend for a 5l?

I have the above on my 5l .V8D supplied and fitted it when they built the engine back up.I can`t help saying it but its making 339bhp can i say it again 339bhp 
I can`t see it being that much of a job, just remember to stock up on the Silicone
I thought the 5l came with this setup as standard !

I can`t see it being that much of a job, just remember to stock up on the Silicone

I thought the 5l came with this setup as standard !
Edited by SILICONE KID on Wednesday 2nd February 20:49
Gassing Station | Griffith | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





