Series 3 vs Range Classic
Series 3 vs Range Classic
Author
Discussion

Arthur Daley

Original Poster:

269 posts

182 months

Friday 21st October 2011
quotequote all
I ve currently got an old series 3 88 1982, its a reliable old thing which I bought ready for the winter as a toy a month or so ago, its not especially desirable being such a late one but it was fully rebuilt on a galvanised chassis last year so thats its selling point.
The only issue is it desperately needs painting its a horrible non standard colour and looks terrible. Its not worth getting resprayed professionally and I work 6 days per week and don't have a workshop or the time to do it.. A coat of paint and some tinkering and it would be a great package but I can't see me finding time to do it.

Now I could just use it as it is although its bugging me abit however a mate (with more time) has offered to swap it for his Range Classic, its a 3.9 Auto, rust free and very tidy, its just before the soft dash, now the best bit is its Beluga Black with grey leather and it has a rare factory handling pack. Now I imagine they are worth similar money... what would you do..

West4x4

672 posts

196 months

Friday 21st October 2011
quotequote all
just get a cheap paint job done to it and keep it!

shunter V8

788 posts

189 months

Saturday 22nd October 2011
quotequote all
I have to agree DON'T swap it,i have had experience of both vehicles,why don't you get it coach painted i got mine done for a couple of hundred,it was a good job for the money.

ClaphamGT3

12,073 posts

267 months

Saturday 22nd October 2011
quotequote all
They really aren't comparible cars; one is a hugely competent but very crude all-out 4x4, the other is a surprisingly sophisticated and complex luxury car that happens to be very good as a 4x4. I'd look at what you are going to use the car for and make your choice on that basis

DKL

4,885 posts

246 months

Saturday 22nd October 2011
quotequote all
What mrgt3 said.
If you're doing any distance get the rangie, they're lovely (although I might be biased).
If not and its just knock around locally and a few trips to the tip then maybe the LR might be better.
I'd still have the classic in a heartbeat though.

shunter V8

788 posts

189 months

Saturday 22nd October 2011
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
They really aren't comparible cars; one is a hugely competent but very crude all-out 4x4, the other is a surprisingly sophisticated and complex luxury car that happens to be very good as a 4x4. I'd look at what you are going to use the car for and make your choice on that basis
This is very true, maybe i was unlucky but my experience with the Range Rover was very expensive,things just kept going wrong and the bills were getting bigger,i am back to a 90 now.

C Lee Farquar

4,198 posts

240 months

Saturday 22nd October 2011
quotequote all
Arthur Daley said:
Range Classic, its a 3.9 Auto, rust free and very tidy
Trust me, if it's rust free you're not looking hard enough.

Both nice cars, and as you say of similar value. Down to your preference.