just a thought
Author
Discussion

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
anyone know if a RR sport chassis is the same as a discovery one?

GetCarter

30,873 posts

303 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
hehe

Siscar

6,315 posts

153 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
It was but not on the new model

GetCarter

30,873 posts

303 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
Siscar said:
It was but not on the new model
I assumed the OP was joking... nobody informed bought the old Sport without knowing it was a disco underneath!?

ETA... gladly, as mentioned, the new one isn't.

Edited by GetCarter on Tuesday 20th August 19:18

Siscar

6,315 posts

153 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
Love the use of the word informed!

GetCarter

30,873 posts

303 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
Siscar said:
Love the use of the word informed!
I just assume that if one is spending that sort of proper money, one knows what they are doing!

Okay, I know it ain't the case much of the time!

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Tuesday 20th August 2013
quotequote all
Thanks guys its back to the drawing board I guess


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es4m9601Daw

camel_landy

5,418 posts

207 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
anyone know if a RR sport chassis is the same as a discovery one?
Mostly...

It is the same but the RRS is 6" shorter & a different suspension config (depending on model).

M


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
anyone know if a RR sport chassis is the same as a discovery one?
Yes if you are an idiot. No if you're not.

Digga

46,744 posts

307 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
anyone know if a RR sport chassis is the same as a discovery one?
They both eat suspension components at a similar rate. HTH.

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Yes if you are an idiot. No if you're not.
and what is meant to mean?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
and what is meant to mean?
Meaning if you/anyone wants to believe it's a Disco chassis, then yes ok it is.

However it isn't as the RRS is a different wheelbase and it is also an integrated bodyframe, semi-monocoque design. Meaning the body is also part of the structural chassis. And it's plane to see by the different shape and appearance that it isn't simply a rebadged Disco wink

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Meaning if you/anyone wants to believe it's a Disco chassis, then yes ok it is.

However it isn't as the RRS is a different wheelbase and it is also an integrated bodyframe, semi-monocoque design. Meaning the body is also part of the structural chassis. And it's plane to see by the different shape and appearance that it isn't simply a rebadged Disco wink
that was what I was trying to determine, many thanks

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
that was what I was trying to determine, many thanks
ok. Hope I wasn't offensive earlier, just thinking back to the idiot comments Top Gear make.

Either way Disco or RRS they are awesome vehicles rarely matched by other mass production vehicles.

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
ok. Hope I wasn't offensive earlier, just thinking back to the idiot comments Top Gear make.

Either way Disco or RRS they are awesome vehicles rarely matched by other mass production vehicles.
No not at all, I am looking at full restoration of my RR classic, was wondering if it was even slightly a starter as I know where there is rolled supercharged RR sport, could I use my classic body on RR sport running gear,was a dumb idea probably

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
Markh said:
No not at all, I am looking at full restoration of my RR classic, was wondering if it was even slightly a starter as I know where there is rolled supercharged RR sport, could I use my classic body on RR sport running gear,was a dumb idea probably
ok, that's a slightly different question.

A classic RR uses it's own chassis, although this in itself is of similar basic architecture as the Series Land Rovers. The Discovery 1 uses an almost identical chassis and fixing points to most classic RR's. Indeed even the windscreen and door frames are the same.

This basic design evolved for the D2 and p38a. Again these are very very similar, but with more differences.

A Defender too uses basically the same sort of chassis and fixing points as a RRC or D1 too.


The D3 and RRS sadly are a completely new generation of vehicle with a completely different design and construction ethos. However that doesn't mean with sufficient work that you couldn't make the base platform and drivetrain work with a classic body shell, but you are entering the realm of quite a custom build, likely with many bespoke parts.

Markh

Original Poster:

2,781 posts

299 months

Wednesday 21st August 2013
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
ok, that's a slightly different question.

A classic RR uses it's own chassis, although this in itself is of similar basic architecture as the Series Land Rovers. The Discovery 1 uses an almost identical chassis and fixing points to most classic RR's. Indeed even the windscreen and door frames are the same.

This basic design evolved for the D2 and p38a. Again these are very very similar, but with more differences.

A Defender too uses basically the same sort of chassis and fixing points as a RRC or D1 too.


The D3 and RRS sadly are a completely new generation of vehicle with a completely different design and construction ethos. However that doesn't mean with sufficient work that you couldn't make the base platform and drivetrain work with a classic body shell, but you are entering the realm of quite a custom build, likely with many bespoke parts.
That is really clear, many thanks for the info, just liked the idea of the classic shape with modern underpinnings, I had a felling that my idea would be flawed, Guess could do an engine transmission swap along with ecu and all the other bit. Thanks again