Range Rover Sport Buying Guide
Range Rover Sport Buying Guide
Author
Discussion

aph202

Original Poster:

81 posts

238 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Hi all,

I've had a brief search and haven't come up trumps; I'm looking for a good RRS buying guide, does anyone know of where this might already have been covered?

I'm most keen to know about servicing costs, general reliability and what I can expect to go wrong/should look out for.

I've heard some horror stories about the main Range Rover and also about the Disco 3, but little good or bad about the Sport.

Thanks all!
Adrian.

Triple7

4,015 posts

259 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Ignore the horror stories and buy with care. The RRS is a Disco anyway!

Go see www.RRSport.co.uk

G

Edited by Triple7 on Tuesday 10th February 14:21

HowMuchLonger

3,023 posts

215 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
RRS uses the Disco ladder chassis and running gear. Older D3's did have issues (05) but the new ones seem to have been sorted.

I still don't understand the RRS. It is no more "S" than a RR, and has a disco level of interior, without the space of either the full fat or the disco.

Meeja

8,290 posts

270 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
http://www.rangerovers.net/rrsportremedies.html

The faithful old Rangie site again.....

Ed

691 posts

297 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
HowMuchLonger said:
RRS uses the Disco ladder chassis and running gear. Older D3's did have issues (05) but the new ones seem to have been sorted.

I still don't understand the RRS. It is no more "S" than a RR, and has a disco level of interior, without the space of either the full fat or the disco.
They both come off the same platform (T5 Integrated Body Frame) but the ladder chassis went out with Series 2 discovery

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

282 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Ed said:
HowMuchLonger said:
RRS uses the Disco ladder chassis and running gear. Older D3's did have issues (05) but the new ones seem to have been sorted.

I still don't understand the RRS. It is no more "S" than a RR, and has a disco level of interior, without the space of either the full fat or the disco.
They both come off the same platform (T5 Integrated Body Frame) but the ladder chassis went out with Series 2 discovery
Seconded.all current range with the exception of the Defender,are of monocoque construction.

HowMuchLonger

3,023 posts

215 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
BLUETHUNDER said:
Ed said:
HowMuchLonger said:
RRS uses the Disco ladder chassis and running gear. Older D3's did have issues (05) but the new ones seem to have been sorted.

I still don't understand the RRS. It is no more "S" than a RR, and has a disco level of interior, without the space of either the full fat or the disco.
They both come off the same platform (T5 Integrated Body Frame) but the ladder chassis went out with Series 2 discovery
Seconded.all current range with the exception of the Defender,are of monocoque construction.
Does not look like a monocoque to me?


As I said monocoque body-ladder chassis

Edited by HowMuchLonger on Thursday 19th February 20:04

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

282 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
HowMuchLonger said:
BLUETHUNDER said:
Ed said:
HowMuchLonger said:
RRS uses the Disco ladder chassis and running gear. Older D3's did have issues (05) but the new ones seem to have been sorted.

I still don't understand the RRS. It is no more "S" than a RR, and has a disco level of interior, without the space of either the full fat or the disco.
They both come off the same platform (T5 Integrated Body Frame) but the ladder chassis went out with Series 2 discovery
Seconded.all current range with the exception of the Defender,are of monocoque construction.
Does not look like a monocoque to me?


As I said monocoque body-ladder chassis

Edited by HowMuchLonger on Thursday 19th February 20:04
Sorry.I misread part of the thread.Its IBF with monocoque body construction,as you have already mentioned.

DBSV8

5,958 posts

260 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Triple7 said:
Ignore the horror stories and buy with care. The RRS is a Disco anyway!

Go see www.RRSport.co.uk

G

Edited by Triple7 on Tuesday 10th February 14:21
thanks thats a good site

SFTR

4 posts

203 months

Tuesday 31st March 2009
quotequote all
HI guys,

I’m only getting in to Range rovers and there is some conflicting information out there.

From this post I’m gathering that the new range rover is a monocoque body bolted on to a traditional ladder chassis.

What I would like to do then is purchase a new 2003 – 2004 sport / vogue cheaply and bolt it on to a < 1979 chassis so as to avail of classic tax and classic insurance.

I’m a little at a loss for information as to the types of chassis that are available if this were to work. I.e. 2 door 4 door etc.

Any info or criticism would be much appreciated

ABT
Brian



HowMuchLonger

3,023 posts

215 months

Tuesday 31st March 2009
quotequote all
SFTR said:
HI guys,

I’m only getting in to Range rovers and there is some conflicting information out there.

From this post I’m gathering that the new range rover is a monocoque body bolted on to a traditional ladder chassis.

What I would like to do then is purchase a new 2003 – 2004 sport / vogue cheaply and bolt it on to a < 1979 chassis so as to avail of classic tax and classic insurance.

I’m a little at a loss for information as to the types of chassis that are available if this were to work. I.e. 2 door 4 door etc.

Any info or criticism would be much appreciated

ABT
Brian

Mad!

DBSV8

5,958 posts

260 months

Wednesday 1st April 2009
quotequote all
HowMuchLonger said:
SFTR said:
HI guys,

I’m only getting in to Range rovers and there is some conflicting information out there.

From this post I’m gathering that the new range rover is a monocoque body bolted on to a traditional ladder chassis.

What I would like to do then is purchase a new 2003 – 2004 sport / vogue cheaply and bolt it on to a < 1979 chassis so as to avail of classic tax and classic insurance.

I’m a little at a loss for information as to the types of chassis that are available if this were to work. I.e. 2 door 4 door etc.

Any info or criticism would be much appreciated

ABT
Brian

Mad!
You mean before circa 1st Jan 1973 chassis then !!!..........you will be lucky to find one thats in good nick
http://www.aronline.co.uk/index.htm?rroverf.htm


Edited by DBSV8 on Wednesday 1st April 06:41

aph202

Original Poster:

81 posts

238 months

Monday 18th May 2009
quotequote all
Well having looked into some of the links recommended above and reading a few more owners' experiences on other websites, I cannot now see myself buying an RRS.

I've been hugely impressed when I've driven them and have even done an off roading course with Land Rover in a TDV8, again very impressive given the emphasis on road dynamics on the Sport. I also think they look cracking and the driver's seat is a fantastic place to be. I'd love one. But it appears owners' experiences with faults, with parking brakes and air suspension in particular, are so common place (and expensive once out of warranty) that I cannot justify setting myself up for that level of hassle.

It's such a shame, I know it has it's critics, but I think it's a cracking car (as is the Disco 3 and true Range Rover), but why have Land Rover not spent a couple of £100 more on building each car to make them truly reliable? Given the warranty claim savings they'd make I think it's ludicrous they haven't done this.

Adrian.

G Man

4,053 posts

282 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
aph202 said:
Well having looked into some of the links recommended above and reading a few more owners' experiences on other websites, I cannot now see myself buying an RRS.

I've been hugely impressed when I've driven them and have even done an off roading course with Land Rover in a TDV8, again very impressive given the emphasis on road dynamics on the Sport. I also think they look cracking and the driver's seat is a fantastic place to be. I'd love one. But it appears owners' experiences with faults, with parking brakes and air suspension in particular, are so common place (and expensive once out of warranty) that I cannot justify setting myself up for that level of hassle.

It's such a shame, I know it has it's critics, but I think it's a cracking car (as is the Disco 3 and true Range Rover), but why have Land Rover not spent a couple of £100 more on building each car to make them truly reliable? Given the warranty claim savings they'd make I think it's ludicrous they haven't done this.

Adrian.
Well there are 2 at the BCA auction at Brighouse, 57 plates so with warrenty , just allocate £500 for a warrenty direct policy after the manufacture one runs out