Discussion
V8 conversions are pretty popular with the series Land Rover. Wikipedia suggests that the series 3 was available new with a 3.5v8, is that right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Rover_Series
Did it use the part-time box and standard series axles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Rover_Series
Did it use the part-time box and standard series axles?
BLUETHUNDER said:
C Lee Farquar said:
I'm sure you know the error a Land Rover pedant would point out in that statement 
Which is?
Lefty said:
V8 conversions are pretty popular with the series Land Rover. Wikipedia suggests that the series 3 was available new with a 3.5v8, is that right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Rover_Series
Did it use the part-time box and standard series axles?
I think its just the way its written.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Rover_Series
Did it use the part-time box and standard series axles?
LR new the axles and gearbox weren't up to more power, hence the AWD system from the RR was needed. So I doubt very much that they would have made a V8 Series production model.
Also the Stage 1 was really a S3 in many ways.
The Australian market also might have some bearing on this too, as they've often done things a bit differently over there, as have other export markets.
topsparks said:
Range Rover engine and box,3.5:1 leaf sprung axles,rear salisbury,front rover (with C.V. joints in),drum brakes all round with servo.
I have a Holtspur sandringham 6x6 Stage1,which is currently under restoration.
Also had the LT95 transmission (primary and transfer gearbox in one casting) giving permanent 4x4 as per 101" and Range Rover...hence the need for CV joints in the front axle.I have a Holtspur sandringham 6x6 Stage1,which is currently under restoration.
Gassing Station | Land Rover | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




yep, but I think there were very few though.