Making the move from perm to contractor
Making the move from perm to contractor
Author
Discussion

Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Been offered a role as a contractor that seems great on paper. I've never done contracting before - but this is a role I know inside out and the day rate is pretty good, plus it's a 9 month contract with the option of going perm at the end of it.

I've been looking at the legal and financial side of being a contractor and a couple of specialist accounts have given me illustrations that say I could be taking around 80% of my pay home. This has been reached by taking minimal salary, spending a couple of £k on expenses a month and getting VAT registered. I'd also be outside of IR35.

Is this really possible?

I know many of the "specialist" accountants on the net are dodgy and not necessary fully legal. I'd rather err on the side of caution.

M

bigunit00

890 posts

178 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
sounds about right....anywhere from 75 to 80% retention is fairly normal. Sounds like a typical ltd company set up. Avoid places saying you can retain 85% plus as these are the dodgy schemes where they pay you in "loans" with a view that it doesn't need to be declared as taxable income. HMRC is cracking down on this big time at the moment. The relative increase in return relative to a more vanilla ltd company set up isn't worth the risk.

Napper

120 posts

243 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Go for it...... But be warned, you may never want to go back to a permanent job again smile

Topper_Harley

147 posts

137 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Amen to that. Couldn't imagine doing this job as a permie

Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Cheers chaps.


bigandclever

14,413 posts

269 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Stupeo said:
I've been looking at the legal and financial side of being a contractor and a couple of specialist accounts have given me illustrations that say I could be taking around 80% of my pay home. This has been reached by taking minimal salary, spending a couple of £k on expenses a month and getting VAT registered. I'd also be outside of IR35. .. I'd rather err on the side of caution.

M
If you're erring on the side of caution then you won't be taking home 80% wink

IR35 is a state of mind, but working practices also trump what the contract says, so considering you haven't started yet how are you so sure you're not IR35 caught?

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
re of the new dividend rules which, on the whole, make dividends less attractive compared to the old rules.

How many customers do you intend to have?

Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
I have been thorough with my research. I'm not an expert mind.

I will be working on a single project with fixed responsibilities using my own equipment etc.


Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
re of the new dividend rules which, on the whole, make dividends less attractive compared to the old rules.

How many customers do you intend to have?
Just the one?

Bikerjon

2,211 posts

192 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Stupeo said:
it's a 9 month contract with the option of going perm at the end of it.
Be a little bit wary of this. If they have already identified that there is a need for a perm then who's to say they won't try to "encourage" you to do this after just 3 months. You have to read between the lines with contracting. The fact that they need someone perm could also suggest that this is a "bum on seat" role rather than consultancy or a project - which will usually have implications for IR35.

Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Bikerjon]tupeo]it's a 9 month contract with the option of going perm at the end of it./quote said:
Be a little bit wary of this. If they have already identified that there is a need for a perm then who's to say they won't try to "encourage" you to do this after just 3 months. You have to read between the lines with contracting. The fact that they need someone perm could also suggest that this is a "bum on seat" role rather than consultancy or a project - which will usually have implications for IR35.
Sorry, should've said - the perm role they've offered is not the same role that I will be contracting for, but i appreciate the comments.

I applied for the permanent role, but during the recruitment process they asked would I consider taking a contractor role for 9 months first as I have the skills to help them out. It's actually a different part of the organisation.


Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Stupeo said:
Eric Mc said:
re of the new dividend rules which, on the whole, make dividends less attractive compared to the old rules.

How many customers do you intend to have?
Just the one?
Based on this, and the fact that this one customer is dangling the prospect of employment as an attraction , you are VERY exposed to IR35. I would seriously advise getting professional advice before you proceed any further with this - or at least you need to be 100% aware of what IR35 is about and what it means to your circumstances.

Stupeo

Original Poster:

1,343 posts

224 months

Friday 14th August 2015
quotequote all
Thanks Eric, I appreciate your advice. I'll get some proper advice before I sign on the dotted line.

BarryGibb

350 posts

178 months

Saturday 15th August 2015
quotequote all
Napper said:
Go for it...... But be warned, you may never want to go back to a permanent job again smile
Surely it depends on the sector. For example, in banking, rates have been flat for the last decade, so as a person's career progresses it can be more lucrative to go down perm route.

bigunit00

890 posts

178 months

Saturday 15th August 2015
quotequote all
BarryGibb said:
Surely it depends on the sector. For example, in banking, rates have been flat for the last decade, so as a person's career progresses it can be more lucrative to go down perm route.
Good pt and reason I just went perm after around 8 yrs contracting.

Olivera

8,828 posts

270 months

Saturday 15th August 2015
quotequote all
Stupeo said:
I applied for the permanent role, but during the recruitment process they asked would I consider taking a contractor role for 9 months first as I have the skills to help them out. It's actually a different part of the organisation.
Applying for a permanent role and only considering contracting when prompted by the client sounds horrible from an IR35 point of view. Get some IR35 advice.

sideways sid

1,467 posts

246 months

Monday 17th August 2015
quotequote all
OP, having now had the benefit of reading your responses to other's posts, it might be better for you / create fewer headaches to see if you can take the contract role on a straightforward fixed term contract of employment.

You're currently employed, and apparently aspire to be employed on a perm basis in future, considering forming a LtdCo for one project, which may be only 3 months duration.

If you want to form and run a business and enjoy the (recently-reduced) tax efficiency of incorporation, in return for the risks involved with running a business, do so. You sound like you do not, and will struggle to justify doing so if HMRC ever ask.

Eric Mc

125,855 posts

296 months

Monday 17th August 2015
quotequote all
Wise words.

JonRB

80,126 posts

303 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
sideways sid said:
OP, having now had the benefit of reading your responses to other's posts, it might be better for you / create fewer headaches to see if you can take the contract role on a straightforward fixed term contract of employment.

You're currently employed, and apparently aspire to be employed on a perm basis in future, considering forming a LtdCo for one project, which may be only 3 months duration.

If you want to form and run a business and enjoy the (recently-reduced) tax efficiency of incorporation, in return for the risks involved with running a business, do so. You sound like you do not, and will struggle to justify doing so if HMRC ever ask.
A very fair point.

Sounds like the OP would be better off using an Umbrella Company if the intention is only to temporarily dip their toe in the water of Contracting.

Also, as others have said, being outside of IR35 is a state of mind and an ongoing undertaking.