SEO - a question on fees for those in that business
SEO - a question on fees for those in that business
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Monday 6th April 2020
quotequote all
Would a good seo person / firm take on a contract where a big chunk of the remuneration was based on a specific measure of performance: the increase in the percentage of total site traffic that comes from organic search?

In initial conversations, I have only encountered the 'rent seeking' fee model (i.e. you pay us £x per month for us to do some stuff that may or may not deliver any specific results). The reticence to link reward to results is marked and offputting.

If a PHer that works in this field wants more specific details of a project, please DM me, but I am interested in hearing views on the general concept of linking pay to results in the SEO field.

Canute

566 posts

98 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
Speaking as an SEO, I think there are too many outside factors to any SEO campaign that make it hard to base fees on performance (certainly not a high percentage). Anyone offering promises of specific ranking positions should be avoided. It's really complex, I'm several groups with other agency owners and we all have differing models and terms. So it's really important to shop around a bit.

I've worked on SEO campaigns for leading recruitment sites and got loads of success, for Google to wade into that market with Google Jobs, the same has happened with hotels, flights and more, so I'd personally be wary of offering something that, ultimately I could not have some influence over. There are too many changes happening inside SEO and today, I think most businesses need to think of it as a continual investment rather than a one of cost to get ranked.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
Thanks

DSLiverpool

16,526 posts

232 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
Jon I’ve emailed you with some examples, we have 20% of our team doing SEO and it’s by far our most successful marketing channel. Any help, advice, questions you have I can set up a call with Paul. Let me know.

jonamv8

3,288 posts

196 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
JPJPJP said:
Would a good seo person / firm take on a contract where a big chunk of the remuneration was based on a specific measure of performance: the increase in the percentage of total site traffic that comes from organic search?

In initial conversations, I have only encountered the 'rent seeking' fee model (i.e. you pay us £x per month for us to do some stuff that may or may not deliver any specific results). The reticence to link reward to results is marked and offputting.

If a PHer that works in this field wants more specific details of a project, please DM me, but I am interested in hearing views on the general concept of linking pay to results in the SEO field.
No I don’t think they/we would!! Far too many factors outside your control that can happen causing a negative affect on SERPS and therefore traffic

johnbear

1,568 posts

265 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
As previously said there are too many factors to be able to offer a performance based offer, but equally I see it from your side.

To achieve success in any competitive seo market is a difficult task. It requires resolving technical issues with your site, a creating customer / solution matrix for the basis of your content plan, creating and publishing content including ebook books to achieve sign ups and auto email res-ponders etc. Each stage has its own issues, for example great content can take 2 weeks to research, create and publish. If you didn't assist in a timely manner you would be damaging the SEO company's ability to hit revenue targets - are you then responsible for their missed fees.Often SEO companies do need client support with content.

It's not so much that SEO is an unknown, but rather it take a huge effort and therefore cost. Most companies like the idea of seo, but not the cost, so they comprise and select a lower cost provider, who really knows for the low cost fee they cannot achieve results. The secondary issue is the time span required to achieve results, it takes a while.

Often companies give up on SEO, again too many SEO's cannot achieve results, Client opt to go for Pay Per Click with Google Ads and an agency such as mine, but in truth most companies do need an SEO, ideally it should generate around 30% of revenue - its just takes a long time, often years to achieve.

In the current climate, you might be able to pause SEO activities and focus on pay per click with more instant results in hours or days.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Tuesday 7th April 2020
quotequote all
Good points, thanks all

Surely though SEO people, like others, would like the opportunity to earn more by delivering results rather than saying this months work for that client is only worth £2k, no matter what benefit the client gets from it

I pay sales people commission, I pay marketing people decent bonus on category growth / profit, I pay procurement on gross margin, but SEO Flat rate £/hr. it seems wrong to me

Otherwise the link between £/hr is never broken and scaling up stays hard

Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 7th April 21:42

Frimley111R

19,293 posts

264 months

Wednesday 8th April 2020
quotequote all
JPJPJP said:
Surely though SEO people, like others, would like the opportunity to earn more by delivering results rather than saying this months work for that client is only worth £2k, no matter what benefit the client gets from it

Edited by JPJPJP on Tuesday 7th April 21:42
I used to pay our SEO guy a flat rate and then a bonus for X leads generated over a certain point. He preferred that and actually suggested it. Of course, if your site is poorly SEO'd you can end up paying them quite a bit though, so it does need thinking about and working out properly

tescorank

2,386 posts

261 months

Wednesday 8th April 2020
quotequote all
I managed to get someone who designed the site and seo on a £1 per unit sold, we are both happy, so it’s out there.

nite_narc

121 posts

216 months

Thursday 9th April 2020
quotequote all
SEO and conversions are two separate elements and often fall under two different disciplines, with the latter sometimes coming under UX and the former also including search engine marketing (SEM).

SEO fees range from a grand or so for a one-off audit with recommendations for improvement to similar again for implementation (if they can access relevant parts of your website). Many will be on a retainer to continue to make SEO updates and optimise over time. As SEO isn't a switch but a battle for dominance it's an activity to revisit frequently.

Things you want to consider are:

Will the SEO specialist focus on best practise and simple upgrades of your website to achieve a baseline SEO performance? Activities like basic keyword research on things like Google Trends and changing image alt text to focus on them would be at this stage.

Might they do more advanced SERP or ranking checks to see how you compare to competitors? Might they write blogs and website copy to help you rank for high-traffic and relevant keywords?

Will they be able to make significant changes to your website to increase conversions? Are you simply driving people to a form on your website who are ready to buy or are you looking for softer leads that you might be able to reach out to?

Why are you only looking at SEO? Why not increase social media, email marketing and wider SEM on Google Ads to increase traffic and leads too?

You could spend anything from a hundred quid a month to hundreds of thousands a month on SEO. The answer lies in your end goal and the investment you'd need to make to achieve that.

AlienLifeForm

467 posts

101 months

Thursday 9th April 2020
quotequote all
If you are serious about your business and it having any kind of longevity, SEO should be the last thing on your marketing checklist. Relying on a sizeable chunk of your revenue coming from the SERPS is a recipe for disaster. As much as some of these so called SEO marketeers talk it up, you are at the mercy of something they can’t control, Google. You can spend a fortune on SEO, have it deliver results in the short term, then have all that traffic disappear almost overnight when Google tweaks their algorithms.

SEO is for the birds and a nice earner for agencies. If you want to attract organic traffic, just create great content that has real value, and Google will recognise that. And your rankings will improve naturally as a result. You don’t need an agency for that, it should be something you are doing to attract customers anyway.

Don’t believe the hype from the agencies, it’s easy money for them and always comes with the caveat that they can’t control Google. So, even if it works for a while, which it often doesn’t, but when it inevitably fails the agency will tell you two things. Number one, it’s down to Google and it wasn’t their fault, and two, to double down on SEO to get back to where you were.

Put whatever budget you have in mind for SEO into something that works, and is a reliable source of quality traffic. Whether that’s employing a copywriter and improving your content, paid search, paid social or affiliates.

Si1295

398 posts

171 months

Thursday 9th April 2020
quotequote all
It can be a dangerous game having SEO done on results as “some” companies will spike your rankings using black hat methods which will work until Google hit you with a stick

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 9th April 2020
quotequote all
good range of views here so far, thanks to all for taking the time to contribute